The Grooming Epidemic is Spreading

[The Nehor]

Okay, maybe it is just an unfortunate choice of words and….

Oh dear………wait, this is satire right? *checks* Nope, not satire.

Oh, some kinkiness, this I can get behind and…..

……never mind. Abusive relationship just waiting to happen.

Good to know the LGBT community does not have a monopoly on “grooming” people.

Looks like the pedophiles (actual groomers), Christians (weird abusive version of grooming), and LGBT community (made up grooming) can all unite in their love of grooming without any of the definitions meaning the same thing.

UNITY!!!!!! KUMBAYA!!!!

[jkwilliams]

That’s some seriously creepy stuff. 

[Kenngo1969]

I don't want to discount the views of anyone who thinks that the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints has a problem with patriarchy, but ... the Church ain't got nothin' on this guy!   

[bluebell]

Despicable. 

[The Nehor]

38 minutes ago, Kenngo1969 said:

I don't want to discount the views of anyone who thinks that the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints has a problem with patriarchy, but ... the Church ain't got nothin' on this guy!   

The beginning of a deep rabbit hole.

He is okay with premarital sex as long as you have committed to each other because marriage licenses aren’t in the Bible (I am sure there is a story there).

He has a lot of articles about sex. Short version: Women were created for men so pretty much anything goes and women are there to make men happy. He justifies rampant lust and pornography. He goes through a lot of questionable scripture to share his basis for what is allowed.

He argues that divorce is okay because God metaphorically divorced Israel which is dubious since she is supposed to be reunited with him. Funny, he got a divorce. Importantly women cannot initiate a divorce because they are the husband’s property. That is not me satirizing with hyperbole either. He thinks feminism went too far in the mid-1800s.

Pro-ethnostate, no surprise there. White Christian Nationalist also gets a big checkmark.

He is pro-polygyny, even if it breaks the law. I flirted with and played in polyamory in my sinful days but this guy’s justification for having multiple wives is mostly about how the man gets more sex, gets an heir, and can even supplement income if some of his wives work part-time. What a deal!

Edited yesterday at 12:34 AM by The Nehor

[Bernard Gui]

1 hour ago, The Nehor said:

The beginning of a deep rabbit hole.

He is okay with premarital sex as long as you have committed to each other because marriage licenses aren’t in the Bible (I am sure there is a story there).

He has a lot of articles about sex. Short version: Women were created for men so pretty much anything goes and women are there to make men happy. He justifies rampant lust and pornography. He goes through a lot of questionable scripture to share his basis for what is allowed.

He argues that divorce is okay because God metaphorically divorced Israel which is dubious since she is supposed to be reunited with him. Funny, he got a divorce. Importantly women cannot initiate a divorce because they are the husband’s property. That is not me satirizing with hyperbole either. He thinks feminism went too far in the mid-1800s.

Pro-ethnostate, no surprise there. White Christian Nationalist also gets a big checkmark.

He is pro-polygyny, even if it breaks the law. I flirted with and played in polyamory in my sinful days but this guy’s justification for having multiple wives is mostly about how the man gets more sex, gets an heir, and can even supplement income if some of his wives work part-time. What a deal!

Nope. 

[Nofear]

deleted... wrong thread

Edited yesterday at 02:05 AM by Nofear

[The Nehor]

I love this guy. If there is a chauvinist reason to want to break the commandments he will. Speaking of divorce he makes it clear that in the Bible divorcing women got nothing so that is the way it should be today and that leads into:

“It is for these reasons that I absolutely encourage Christian men going through divorce to practice deception when it comes to their assets and income wherever they can while they are in this spiritual and legal war otherwise known as divorce.“

Absolute garbage person. Family Court Judges usually eat these clowns alive. It is so cute how they think they invented a neat trick that divorce judges don’t see from every halfwit that shows up.

Edited yesterday at 07:13 PM by The Nehor

[bluebell]

5 minutes ago, The Nehor said:

I love this guy. If there is a chauvinist reason to want to break the commandments he will. Speaking of divorce he makes it clear that in the Bible divorcing women got nothing so that is the way it should be today and that leads into:

“It is for these reasons that I absolutely encourage Christian men going through divorce to practice deception when it comes to their assets and income wherever they can while they are in this spiritual and legal war otherwise known as divorce.“

Absolute garbage person. Family Court Judges usually eat these clowns alive. It is so cute how they think they invented a neat trick that divorce judges don’t see from every halfwit that shows up.

He is the WORST.

[CV75]

On 8/5/2022 at 7:17 PM, The Nehor said:

Okay, maybe it is just an unfortunate choice of words and….

Oh dear………wait, this is satire right? *checks* Nope, not satire.

Oh, some kinkiness, this I can get behind and…..

……never mind. Abusive relationship just waiting to happen.

Good to know the LGBT community does not have a monopoly on “grooming” people.

Looks like the pedophiles (actual groomers), Christians (weird abusive version of grooming), and LGBT community (made up grooming) can all unite in their love of grooming without any of the definitions meaning the same thing.

UNITY!!!!!! KUMBAYA!!!!

Inmate grooming can be a wholesome part of every marriage as well as part of good hygiene.

I provide a tasteful, cash-under-the-table or barter-exchange service for the latter.

[Calm]

“Inmate grooming”….kind of an appropriate typo considering the linked website, imo. (Intimate grooming?)

Edited 23 hours ago by Calm

[CV75]

1 hour ago, Calm said:

“Inmate grooming”….kind of an appropriate typo considering the linked website, imo. (Intimate grooming?)

Ha-ha! either way! Inmates have feelings, too!

[Orthodox Christian]

On 8/6/2022 at 12:17 AM, The Nehor said:

Okay, maybe it is just an unfortunate choice of words and….

Oh dear………wait, this is satire right? *checks* Nope, not satire.

Oh, some kinkiness, this I can get behind and…..

……never mind. Abusive relationship just waiting to happen.

Good to know the LGBT community does not have a monopoly on “grooming” people.

Looks like the pedophiles (actual groomers), Christians (weird abusive version of grooming), and LGBT community (made up grooming) can all unite in their love of grooming without any of the definitions meaning the same thing.

UNITY!!!!!! KUMBAYA!!!!

Where was the first quite from? I knew some Christians years ago who took the Bible's advice on marriage to the extreme. Very similar views on wifely subjection. The young man's response though is worrying to say the least, to think that he believes that he can legitimately beat his wife into submission is a far cry from any proper view of marriage Christian or not.

[Stargazer]

10 hours ago, Calm said:

“Inmate grooming”….kind of an appropriate typo considering the linked website, imo. (Intimate grooming?)

I have the feeling that autocorrect is a factor here. I think it was supposed to be "primate grooming", given the nature of the video.

Maybe.

[The Nehor]

2 hours ago, Orthodox Christian said:

Where was the first quite from? I knew some Christians years ago who took the Bible's advice on marriage to the extreme. Very similar views on wifely subjection. The young man's response though is worrying to say the least, to think that he believes that he can legitimately beat his wife into submission is a far cry from any proper view of marriage Christian or not.

https://biblicalgenderroles.com/2020/07/16/7-steps-to-grooming-your-christian-wife/