-
Content Count
25,281 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Community Reputation
28,723 ExcellentAbout bluebell
- Currently Viewing Topic: Church discipline proceedings on a member who no longer lives in the stake boundaries?
-
Rank
Rules Universe
- Birthday 10/26/1976
Profile Information
-
Gender
Female
-
Location
wyoming
Recent Profile Visitors
9,314 profile views
-
Someone going through trauma publicly is never a great time to try to judge how trustworthy or rational they are. I'll give Helfer a pass on that and don't think it means her life is a trainwreck. But I do think that it was wise she shut down her professional facebook page (at least for a time). She was spiraling on it and needed to take a break.
-
When asked what church you belong to, how do you respond?
bluebell replied to Fair Dinkum's topic in General Discussions
I don't know if I've been asked that question within the last 20 years. If I was, I would answer with the first option. -
I get that and I agree. What I meant was that in regards to Natasha Helfer, I don't think the issues of the name and her membership council are separate. The name of the organization, coupled with her teachings on church doctrine within that organization, could be one of the reasons they felt they needed to call a membership council.
-
Someone who's not a member of the church who is using the word "mormon" is less likely to be considered to be representing the church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, than someone who is a member of the church using that term. And I don't think that Calm was speaking about her not following church policy. It's her not following church doctrine that would be the issue.
-
It seems like she only has contempt for church leaders, including apostles and prophets, and does not believe they hold any authority. She also seems to disagree with many church doctrines, from sexual stuff to lgtbq stuff, to the sealing of families stuff. I really don't understand why she wants to stay.