Cool journey HP. Mine is similar.
I was newly converted in the late '90's, and would frequent BBS's, usenet groups, discussion forums, etc. I was quiet for years, just watching the debate go by. Early on, it seemed to me, we were losing the debate from just sheer numbers of critics, with nobody knowing what to say to them.
I'm not a scholar, I'm not particularly bright, have no particular rhetorical gifts, and I'm a slow thinker. Watching faithful and critic interact online, and reading FARMS articles, was about my speed through the '90's and the decade that followed. Eventually I began participating, whenever I'd see a criticism that had been answered since the 1840's appear again, I'd produce the answer I had encountered that made sense to me. (If nothing else, we eventually won the "Nephite coinage" battle. It's been years since I heard "The BoM couldn't have been translated, because it has the word 'adieu' in it, and that's not English!"). My usernames evolved along with my familiarity with the material into the proud battlin' apologetic warrior you see before you today. I entered semi-retirement after having achieved two of what I consider the greatest accolades an average IQ armchair apologist like me could achieve:
1- One of the prolific posters on the UK-based Reachout Trust Counter-cult forums 'non-Christian religions' board, admitted to me, after years of arguing, the possibility that I may indeed be a saved Christian.
2- Dr. Peterson called one of my points "salient", in the forum that eventually became mormondialogue.org.
I'd cut/paste stuff into my Word doc, my apologetic database currently stands at 212 pages. I still refer to it on occasion, because it has such gems. Like this one, which at 17+ yrs old seems to have aged remarkably well: