longview

Your perspective is fragmentary and inconsistent. When the Fall occurred, not only did Adam and Eve become mortal but the entire planet became corrupt and violent and chaotic. You are skirting around the fact that "The Gods" cannot organize a debased and carnal telestial world. They had to begin with an entire paradisiacal planet devoid of chaos and death. With the Garden of Eden "set up" to offer Adam and Eve a mutually exclusive choice for maintaining the utopian paradisiacal state forever XOR initiating the Fall.

What does this viewpoint mean to you and how do you deal with death before Adam and Eve? To say that there were hominids that lived and died PRIOR to the establishment of the "Garden of Eden" is to imply that the world began as a telestial world. Which is a contradiction for the following reasons: it would be illogical for "The Gods" to first create a telestial world then change it into a terrestrial world in which there were immortal creatures living in Paradise having no corruption and chaos "The Gods" first determined to start a Plan of Happiness by going "down" to where there was "matter unorganized" to make "it into a world like unto the worlds that we have heretofore formed." it is very possible that "matter unorganized" may have included fragments of dead planets that contained geological layers imbedded with hominids and various other lifeforms another perspective is that dating methods may be way off the mark (refer to Stephen Myers for his powerful overview of scientific arguments - https://stephencmeyer.org/)

Scales of darkness has fallen off our eyes.

Amazing case of sanctioned abuse of parents in the state of Oregon: --report--

You are operating in accordance with Saul Alinsky's book: "Rules for Radicals".

I’ve long suspected that argument is a sport you enjoy. No. Because so many liberals and especially extreme radicals spout simple-minded knee-jerk one-line slogans, it actually would be beneficial for showing links that provide contrast and examine juxtapositions. Charlie Kirk was so wonderful in drawing out thoughtful debates. Because if we don't communicate, then there is a danger of increasing violence (as we are seeing among the doctrinaire communists).

Based on many decades of scripture study, I would say that 2Ne2:15 is chiastic. Meaning the bitter is related to the Forbidden Fruit and the sweet is related to the Tree of Life. Which makes logical sense based on the many scriptures that touch on the sweet and bitter.

Yes! So many of them. To wit: college campus thugs gang punching Riley after having "conveniently" labelled her as phobic and fascistic so-called "peaceful rioters" burning down democrat-domiciled cities and robbing middle class small business owners Kyle Rittenhouse being targeted by antifa insurrectionists for wanting to help defend small businesses the Clintons and many others engaging in the "politics of personal destruction" for over quarter of a century pallets of bricks being "pre-staged" around various locations of targeted cities prior to actual rioting (premeditated) SPLC (Southern Poverty Law Center) false agitation and deliberate character assassination of conservative leaders and organizations falsely recruiting and paying large sums to ragtag members of insignificant right-wing groups for staging an "event" like at Charlottesville and on and on and on They are NOT marginalized, just simply pitied. We are to be greatly concerned for those that are "stampeded" into "causes" foisted by "social contagion". I will recopy my response to Calm here: The radical social engineers absolutely do NOT care. They love putting on a propaganda show. AND IF people do object, they relish the opportunity to slam them for being "intolerant bigots" or transphobic. Those trannies? They exult in being vanguards of the "REVOLUTION" and love to flaunt their radicalism and "daring". All mostly social contagion. The left's tactic of deviding people into "victim classes" does nothing but exacerbate the polarization of society. NEEDLESSLY! They will even rank those "victim classes" in accordance of radical chic scores (which does vary from moment to moment. Such as George Soros? So many of those billionaires.

How to determine whether psychologist and/or psychiatrist are qualified to counsel or analyze "properly" cases of "gender dysphoria" ? Were they utilized sufficiently for helping children requesting affirmative care? Or did they reflexively pass them on to medical alterations? How to tell if they are too badly warped by wokist tendencies? What if they are prejudiced against christianity?

But that procedure was sloppy. Shouldn't the SP finance clerk handle the paperwork from start to finish? That way, the bishop will not drift into impropriety?

I'm getting the feeling that the Stake President should have been paying closer attention to the situation and being more proactive in "shepherding" and ministering for the bishop. The SP probably was being sloppy and the bishop should have been wiser about getting entangled.

Agree. My thoughts are that "AT POINT ZERO" before God sets out to start a new generation of the Plan of Happiness, He approaches the "Council of the Gods" to be given leave to recruit that vast cohort of intelligences. In order to begin the implementation of the Plan, They must verify ("looking into the future") that a "Lamb of God" is provided as a sacrifice to make everything possible. Including all the contentions in the pre-existence, acquisition of matter "unorganized", setting up a "Garden of Eden" primed for the Fall, all the natural disasters and grief, and the deliberate rebellions and perversions and agonies. The Resurrection is the gift made possible by the Atonement. This is the "price" the Father and His Lamb of God were willing to pay (IN FULL) to make ALL the experiences possible. So even if reprobates don't appreciate that price, it was necessary to bring about the next Eternal Round.

How to explain the Starlink phenomena? Hundreds of those satellites swarming in space? How many GPS satellites are there?

You are probably right on the permanence of this judgment. But my point still holds. Jesus did suffer completely for that reprobate. Including Lucifer and his angles.

You targeted Riley by insinuating falsely that she is behaving as a "bigot" and for wanting to harm trans in any way. Not the case al all. In your three links that you posted, Riley did NOT post any pictures herself. In Media Matters, she was being interviewed and had no control over what pictures were being shown. It was the interviewer's and her staff that compiled and produce the show. As point in fact, she used the picture released by the second runner up's parents who put obscuring circles on all the heads of participants EXCEPT second runner up (their daughter). If any of them were going to be targeted, it would be the second runner up! Her parents understood that BUT the 3 of them were willing to stand for protecting female athletes and making it fair. That is definitely NOT the concern or intention of Riley. Her focus is to put pressure on administrators for their gross unfairness in forcing females to put up with the insanity of tran thugs being allowed to smash women/girls records. And even dangerously harming actual females. The radical social engineers absolutely do NOT care. They love putting on a propaganda show. AND IF people do object, they relish the opportunity to slam them for being "intolerant bigots" or transphobic. Those trannies? They exult in being vanguards of the "REVOLUTION" and love to flaunt their radicalism and "daring". All mostly social contagion.