Jump to content
Seriously No Politics ×

Should there be a new calling to focus on the "Poor and Needy"?


Recommended Posts

Posted

It is part and parcel of discipleship.   It is supposed to be what HT/VTing are about, and compassionate service (though not just financially needy), even institute and other educational pursuits (did you know that RS has a reading curriculia available to teach those who cannot read, using the bible, for instance, and all the provident living that helps people climb so they are able to reach a hand down for those behind them on the ladder.

It is wholly about changed hearts.   Any ward mission or provident living leader will tell you that having someone named in charge doesn't do anything to change hearts.

Posted
19 minutes ago, cinepro said:

I think the leaders could probably give counsel that is clear enough for the members to rationally follow without going overboard.  Like when President Hinckley told the young women that "One modest pair of earrings is sufficient" and no one went overboard.

Point taken.

Posted
26 minutes ago, cinepro said:

Like I said, if you're in the camp of "the Church is doing enough", that's fine.  I'm open to that idea as well.

I'm just posting from my own experience.  Maybe my ward is the exception, but I get invited to volunteer at the soup kitchen once a year around Christmas.  I get asked to come help at "Mormon Helping Hands" once in the spring (and that's usually not anything to do with the "poor and needy"). 

But I get invited all the time to go to the Temple, do family history work, do my home teaching and clean the Church building.  No one has to google about whether or not LDS believe in Home/ Visiting Teaching because we have people whose callings it is to do nothing but track whether or not people are doing their visits and we hear about it every week in Church.

To put it another way, if the Church decided that "Caring for the Poor and Needy" was going to get just as much time, effort and money at the local level as "Redeem the Dead" and "Proclaim the Gospel", would they need to change anything, and if so, how would they do it?

I am not in the camp of the Church is doing enough.  I am in the camp of show some recognition of what the Church is actually doing before complaining it isn't doing much of anything.

If you have to wait around to get invited to help the poor and needy, maybe you should be looking elsewhere for the problem.

Posted

So, I don't want to add to the Mormon leaks situation but the Church is kind of moving into this area already. I don't know about the US but this program has been rolled out in several Canadian Stakes and apparently developing countries. From what I heard this grew out of the PEF but people needed more than education. It isn't just a "poor and needy" but it's under the umbrella of Self Reliance. There are 4 areas that are going to be focused on, Education, Finances and I forget the other two. But a Couple will oversee this and it'll be run like  ARP (addictions recovery program) where you attend an area like education and they are meetings with discussion leaders and you can rotate through the different areas. Who goes to these I have no idea or how all that is determined. I saw the manual but apparently it's more 3rd world country examples and situations so i've heard they are updating it to a North American model. The manual is in my posession but I can't get to it as I am dying so if I make until tomorrow I can share more from the bookB:)

Posted

Anything we can think of to try to help the poor and needy is something we can do and there is no need to wait for a calling to do it. 

And now that is all I have to say about that.

Posted
2 hours ago, Calm said:

Not really.  If someone is actually interested in serving, why wouldn't they go looking on LDS.org or ask someone in their ward who would be able to direct them to the right place about it and keep asking till they find that person.

Would you sit around and wait for someone from the American Cancer Society to come knocking at your door to invite you to volunteer or go look them up to see what was needed?

Why expect the Church to do things differently?  They publish articles, put out press releases from time to time and make whole websites to make it easier for people to serve and still we get people complaining they weren't told.

The drive to help must not be too strong if they won't even take the first step on their own and instead just fantasize about it.

And you do this over and over, applaud the ignorant complaints, even after being told where the information is..  I don't know what would satisfy you at this point.

Obviously this is a sore point for me, but I am so tired of people not being willing to do the effort to learn, but so willing to complain about their ignorance and blame it on others.  Grow up and be responsible for yourself.

I may be guilty of some of your comments about me, but not all of it. I do try, I've looked on LDS.org for service ideas and I love the JustServe website. I guess the idea that I'll never do what I use to think I would, like serving a mission with my husband, just brings it to the surface. We don't hold current recommends so we won't get this opportunity. But I know there are other ways out there. 

 

Posted
5 hours ago, cinepro said:

........................................................................

What do you think?  What could the Church (and Church members) do to systematically make big improvements in "caring for the poor and needy"?

In parts of Utah, where the Mormon population is nearly everyone, the Church could transform itself into the sort of "machine" which you envision -- for systematic care for the poor and needy, including full application of education and training under the new Pathway program, in which non-members would be fully included (under current geographical ward boundaries).  "Teach a man to fish," and all that.

Elsewhere, the overarching problem is that secular and partisan political notions and structures interfere with effective implementation of such care.  Our current efforts as a puny church simply cannot make a big enough dent in the overall problem.  Our Pathway program is shifting into high gear worldwide, is very successful, and will prove to be a big leg up for members.  Our service missionaries attack the problems of poverty and drought in a variety of ways worldwide, and we cooperate with many other NGOs in doing so, but bad weather, war, and displacement of refugees dwarfs all of those efforts.  In order to get beyond those Sisyphean efforts, we need to look at socio-political transformation here at home, in the USA.

We could, for example, make Utah a shining example for the rest of America.  Perhaps we could begin by jettisoning partisan politics and our failed free-market capitalism in favor of the law of consecration.  But would that even be possible?  Perhaps with Mitt Romney at the helm in such an effort (as he did with the Utah Olympics), such reorganization would be possible.  Maybe . . .  and I don't even like Romney.

In any case, such socio-political transformation first calls for personal transformation in each of us.  The late Max Skousen attacked the problem in Los Angeles by having a bunch of stake presidents gather with him at a thrift store to purchase clothes that would make them all look somewhat homeless or down-and-out.  None of them had shaved that week.  Then they went out into poor neighborhoods and mingled with the street-people, ate at soup kitchens, stayed the night at the Union Rescue Mission, etc. (I'm trying to recall what they did now, and am having difficulty remembering; perhaps someone has a copy of the article describing it all, possibly in Dialogue).

Anything done would have to have the full blessing of the Brethren.

Posted
2 hours ago, Duncan said:

So, I don't want to add to the Mormon leaks situation but the Church is kind of moving into this area already. I don't know about the US but this program has been rolled out in several Canadian Stakes and apparently developing countries. From what I heard this grew out of the PEF but people needed more than education. It isn't just a "poor and needy" but it's under the umbrella of Self Reliance. There are 4 areas that are going to be focused on, Education, Finances and I forget the other two. But a Couple will oversee this and it'll be run like  ARP (addictions recovery program) where you attend an area like education and they are meetings with discussion leaders and you can rotate through the different areas. Who goes to these I have no idea or how all that is determined. I saw the manual but apparently it's more 3rd world country examples and situations so i've heard they are updating it to a North American model. The manual is in my posession but I can't get to it as I am dying so if I make until tomorrow I can share more from the bookB:)

I think you are referring to this.  It's a series of 12 week training courses led by "facilitators" called from the wards.  The four courses I've seen are:

Personal finance
Starting and Growing My Business
Education for Better Work
Find a Better Job

Good luck not dying.  That would stink.

Posted (edited)
57 minutes ago, Robert F. Smith said:

In parts of Utah, where the Mormon population is nearly everyone, the Church could transform itself into the sort of "machine" which you envision -- for systematic care for the poor and needy, including full application of education and training under the new Pathway program, in which non-members would be fully included (under current geographical ward boundaries).  "Teach a man to fish," and all that.

Elsewhere, the overarching problem is that secular and partisan political notions and structures interfere with effective implementation of such care.  Our current efforts as a puny church simply cannot make a big enough dent in the overall problem.  Our Pathway program is shifting into high gear worldwide, is very successful, and will prove to be a big leg up for members.  Our service missionaries attack the problems of poverty and drought in a variety of ways worldwide, and we cooperate with many other NGOs in doing so, but bad weather, war, and displacement of refugees dwarfs all of those efforts.  In order to get beyond those Sisyphean efforts, we need to look at socio-political transformation here at home, in the USA.

We could, for example, make Utah a shining example for the rest of America.  Perhaps we could begin by jettisoning partisan politics and our failed free-market capitalism in favor of the law of consecration.  But would that even be possible?  Perhaps with Mitt Romney at the helm in such an effort (as he did with the Utah Olympics), such reorganization would be possible.  Maybe . . .  and I don't even like Romney.

In any case, such socio-political transformation first calls for personal transformation in each of us.  The late Max Skousen attacked the problem in Los Angeles by having a bunch of stake presidents gather with him at a thrift store to purchase clothes that would make them all look somewhat homeless or down-and-out.  None of them had shaved that week.  Then they went out into poor neighborhoods and mingled with the street-people, ate at soup kitchens, stayed the night at the Union Rescue Mission, etc. (I'm trying to recall what they did now, and am having difficulty remembering; perhaps someone has a copy of the article describing it all, possibly in Dialogue).

Anything done would have to have the full blessing of the Brethren.

Sorry, couldn't get the link to work, but there's an article on Bloomberg.com entitled "How Utah Keeps the American Dream Alive".

The gist is, Utah is already a "shining example for the rest of America".  It has the highest upward mobility in the country, and the LDS church is a big part of the reason why.

 

Edited by Traela
Posted
Just now, gopher said:

I think you are referring to this.  It's a series of 12 week training courses led by "facilitators" called from the wards.  The four courses I've seen are:

Personal finance
Starting and Growing My Business
Education for Better Work
Find a Better Job

Good luck not dying.  That would stink.

that' is it!!! thanks man!!!!

Posted
1 hour ago, Traela said:

Sorry, couldn't get the link to work, but there's an article on Bloomberg.com entitled "How Utah Keeps the American Dream Alive".

The gist is, Utah is already a "shining example for the rest of America".  It has the highest upward mobility in the country, and the LDS church is a big part of the reason why.

 

Interesting.

Have a look at the Prosperity Gospel thread for examples of how this is a bad thing.  According to some people, anyway.

Posted
1 hour ago, Traela said:

Sorry, couldn't get the link to work, but there's an article on Bloomberg.com entitled "How Utah Keeps the American Dream Alive".

The gist is, Utah is already a "shining example for the rest of America".  It has the highest upward mobility in the country, and the LDS church is a big part of the reason why.

Yes, thanks for reminding us.  That the author is an outsider is evident from her use of the term "Utahans."

Posted
3 hours ago, PeterPear said:

Steadying the Ark.

good luck

How about D&C 58:26 For behold, it is not meet that I should command in all things; for he that is compelled in all things, the same is a slothful and not a wise servant; wherefore he receiveth no reward.
27 Verily I say, men should be anxiously engaged in a good cause, and do many things of their own free will, and bring to pass much righteousness;
28 For the power is in them, wherein they are agents unto themselves. And inasmuch as men do good they shall in nowise lose their reward.
29 But he that doeth not anything until he is commanded, and receiveth a commandment with doubtful heart, and keepeth it with slothfulness, the same is damned.

Posted

I think more could definitely be done. This is something that is starting to be more on the church's radar, but it still seems like it's on the back burner compared to work for the dead or reactivation. But, life in the church is already pretty programmed (or can be if you let it), and there are a lot of things taking up members' time and money as it is. I think to give equal time to philanthropy, we'd need to scale back on something we're already doing. Members do not have infinite reserves of time and money. 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, CV75 said:

The Church piloted a self-reliance initiative outside the USA and is currently rolling it out in the USA. https://www.ldsphilanthropies.org/perpetual-education-fund/news-features/New-Self-Reliance-Services-Initiative-Ignites-Hope.html

It basically combines welfare and employment services into one "Self-Reliance" program: https://www.lds.org/topics/pef-self-reliance/manuals-and-videos/na?lang=eng&old=true

They are currently doing this in our stake.

Posted

The church has some really good service programs and officially the Bishop has the specific calling to care for the poor and needy at the ward level and chairs the ward welfare committee (actually not sure if that's still an official thing). However, bishops are overwhelmed with responsibilities and can hardly be expected to spearhead service opportunities in the ward. So he hopefully delicates service needs and caring for the poor and needy to the Relief Society and Priesthood quorums. But they are also really busy so it's hard to step outside of the day-to-day requirements of the callings and get more involved in communities. So they likely need to delegate a little more. I would see nothing wrong with having a member or two from the RS and PH quorums assigned to identify and develop community service opportunities. There are some good service projects that go on in wards and stakes around the world but maybe not as many as could be done, simply because every active person in the church is super busy with other church, family, and personal responsibilities. Still, it could be more of a focus.

If that doesn't work, they could always cancel church on the 3rd Sundays and call it Service Sunday where everyone is encouraged to serve others outside of the immediate church community. But somehow I don't see that happening. :) 

Posted
1 minute ago, HappyJackWagon said:

The church has some really good service programs and officially the Bishop has the specific calling to care for the poor and needy at the ward level and chairs the ward welfare committee (actually not sure if that's still an official thing). However, bishops are overwhelmed with responsibilities and can hardly be expected to spearhead service opportunities in the ward. So he hopefully delicates service needs and caring for the poor and needy to the Relief Society and Priesthood quorums. But they are also really busy so it's hard to step outside of the day-to-day requirements of the callings and get more involved in communities. So they likely need to delegate a little more. I would see nothing wrong with having a member or two from the RS and PH quorums assigned to identify and develop community service opportunities. There are some good service projects that go on in wards and stakes around the world but maybe not as many as could be done, simply because every active person in the church is super busy with other church, family, and personal responsibilities. Still, it could be more of a focus.

If that doesn't work, they could always cancel church on the 3rd Sundays and call it Service Sunday where everyone is encouraged to serve others outside of the immediate church community. But somehow I don't see that happening. :) 

Cancelling Church one Sunday a month is an awesome idea.  We could use that day, organize a great service in the community project each month and do it as a ward.  I realize most would be opposed to that but if it came from the top, it could work.  I think most would find that that Sunday would produce more spiritual experiences than Church ever does. 

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...