your two statements don't make any sense
"only" Joseph F. Smith claimed to have seen Jesus, but how can you say that when you also said that you want me to find these other people's statements, as if you know what they are in order to make your first statement that "only" Joseph F. Smith said he saw Christ-which is in Section 138 by the way. Just because someone lied once doesn't mean we throw absolutely everything they ever said out, that is so balck and white thinking. I'll give you one, from Pres. Kimball. This is from the Grandson of a lady who heard served a mission in 1947 when he related the following
“She told me that because of the caliber of missionaries he was addressing, Elder Kimball felt at liberty to speak more freely than the Brethren generally do about the sacred and solemn interviews involved in calling an apostle and qualifying him to stand as a special witness of the Lord Jesus Christ in all the earth. He told them a story familiar to many of us—of the anxiety and the inadequacy he felt; of the nagging doubt that he had been called, not by revelation, but because he was the grandson of President Heber C. Kimball; and of his flight to the mountains, amid fasting and prayer, to seek a witness from the Lord that the call had come from Him and not from man….: “This [apostle] revealed an additional and dramatic detail about how that witness came. President Kimball . . . saw the Lord Jesus and heard from the mouth of the Savior Himself the soul-cheering affirmation, ‘I have called you to be my witness to the world. Doubt not, but be of good cheer.’”
Sister Evelyn Larsen, Central States Mission, June 1947"
If you refuse to believe anyone's personal witness then why don't you get your own vision of Christ?