Jump to content

Utah Jazz Player Jeremy Evans Draws The Slc Temple


BCSpace

Recommended Posts

As a personal effort the picture is just fine and commendable, BUT the second link that BC provided seems to indicate that the piece is now for sale. If true, then it is now eligible for critique. It is similar to when my daughter plays the piano for us at a family get-together. There should be no complaints and abundant praise for her efforts. However, if she plays for a concert or accompanies a singer and gets paid for it,then she opens herself to criticism and should expect it.

Link to comment

As a personal effort the picture is just fine and commendable, BUT the second link that BC provided seems to indicate that the piece is now for sale. If true, then it is now eligible for critique. It is similar to when my daughter plays the piano for us at a family get-together. There should be no complaints and abundant praise for her efforts. However, if she plays for a concert or accompanies a singer and gets paid for it,then she opens herself to criticism and should expect it.

Should we remove all Temple art from Deseret Book? ;)

Link to comment

From my personal perspective,there is a lot of ' stuff ' for sale at Deseret Book and other LDS bookstores that is in bad taste or at least leave a bad taste in my mouth from pre-emptive stiffling of upchucking. ( I exaggerate hyperbolically but I have a hard time with the commercialization of the sacred . ) Do we really need more gospel trinkets?

( rant off )

Link to comment
Quite correct. I stand convicted of leading this thread in a direction not intended by BC. Apologies all around.

No problem. Take it wherever you like. If someone doesn't like it, they can ignore it. I believe in free uncensored discussion, even in smaller topics like this one. Truth rises to the top much quicker that way. My threads are not so sacrosanct that I can't welcome all opinions or intense debate or criticism. I learn or derive enjoyment from all comments.

The only time I've ever asked for someone else to be censored is when I felt I was being censored in favor of that person.

:)

Link to comment

Very interesting work. I can't draw a straight line with a ruler, but the artist here could use a couple of lessons in perspective. :nea:

I noticed a few things... but as someone who has some difficulty with perspective when I draw, I noticed instead the level of detail and overall skill of his rendering and found much to admire... it's a lovely drawing. Majestic...

GG

Link to comment

Coming from an NBA player, it's a virtual Mona Lisa.

:pirate:

But seriously, I think it's great that he's got a hobby (everyone should have one) and I wonder what inspired him to do the temple instead of say, a view of the mountains or other cityscape?

It's a good picture and has a nice atmosphere to it. Seems respectfully done.

My concern is that on the instagram one I couldn't understand half the comments.

That's dope

Does that mean he liked it or didn't like it... oh dear, I'm now getting old. And a photo is both 'sick' and 'good' :nea:

Link to comment

As a personal effort the picture is just fine and commendable, BUT the second link that BC provided seems to indicate that the piece is now for sale. If true, then it is now eligible for critique. It is similar to when my daughter plays the piano for us at a family get-together. There should be no complaints and abundant praise for her efforts. However, if she plays for a concert or accompanies a singer and gets paid for it,then she opens herself to criticism and should expect it.

If you don't like it don't buy it. If you do buy it. To me it is that simple. There is no need to find fault except as an excuse not to buy. My grand children do art in school and I don't feel the need to critique it. I just enjoy their offerings. Would I spend large sums for it? No but some of it does hang on my refrigerator.

Link to comment

From my personal perspective,there is a lot of ' stuff ' for sale at Deseret Book and other LDS bookstores that is in bad taste or at least leave a bad taste in my mouth from pre-emptive stiffling of upchucking. ( I exaggerate hyperbolically but I have a hard time with the commercialization of the sacred . ) Do we really need more gospel trinkets?

( rant off )

Perhaps not, but my point is that it's no worse for Mr. Evans to profit off of his work (sacredness of the subject notwithstanding) than it is for anyone else (the vast majority of whom are Church members) to do so. :)

Link to comment

I noticed a few things... but as someone who has some difficulty with perspective when I draw, I noticed instead the level of detail and overall skill of his rendering and found much to admire... it's a lovely drawing. Majestic...

GG

Ditto, that! ;):)

Link to comment
"He's an amazing artist," Jazz guard Earl Watson said. "I think that a lot of people don't realize how great he really is, how talented he is off the court as well."

Thanks to Evans' teammate and friend, more people are aware of that now.

Earlier this week, Watson posted a picture of a detailed ink drawing of the Salt Lake Temple that Evans created last summer.

The impressive art — currently showing on Twitter (@Earl_Watson) and Instagram (therealwyco) — was an Internet hit in the Jazz community.

"Before that, nobody knew about it," Evans admitted.

The artistic Evans said it was interesting and tough to draw the 119-year-old edifice of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, with all of its arched windows and familiar spires.

"I didn't want to mess up. It's their temple," said Evans, who's drawn the Utah landmark multiple times. "I had fun doing it. After I got done, I was proud of it."

Now, to answer two questions the artistic athlete knows you might have after he drew a world-renowned building that's awed onlookers since its 40-year-long construction concluded in 1893.

"A lot of people ask me if I'm LDS," he said, without being asked about his religious beliefs. "But I'm not."

So what inspired him to draw it?

"I just figured when people want something that's what you do," Evans said. "I figure there's a lot of LDS in Salt Lake, so why not draw the temple to, I guess, draw their attention, show what they want?"

Evans, whose non-hoops hobbies also include playing the guitar and carving, plans on drawing more LDS temples. As it is, his art collection includes a cherished painting of a lion, an airbrushed Tupac piece and a pastel of Michael Jordan — not to overlook a Jerry Sloan portrait he gave the retired coach.

"I have a good variety," he said. "It's hard to part with sometimes."

Evans has considered making prints of his LDS temples to sell. He intends to branch out with his art to include T-shirts, shoes and hats as his canvas. He even picked up a hat on this trip that he plans on drawing on. He also likes drawing landscapes and his home. The Western Kentucky product said he takes anywhere between about an hour (like for this temple piece) and two days to work on his art.

Most bizarre thing he's drawn?

"I stay away from the weird stuff," he said.

Watson has been thoroughly impressed with Evans' non-weird stuff.

"I think that's a great picture. It's rare for an NBA player to be able to have that ability," Watson said. "I think it's something that he should seriously start doing more in his off time, and just grow as an individual on and off the court."

Watson joked that he posted Evans' drawing because, well, people wouldn't want to see his attempts at art.

"I try to draw something, too, but mine tend to look the same as my 3-year-old daughter's," Watson said. "Hers is a little bit better, so I decided to not tweet (mine) out. I'm not as good as Jeremy. I am his art agent."

Evans has been on the receiving end of multiple eye-popping alley-oop passes from Watson over the years, and he's happy to get this kind of assist.

"Maybe I'll let Earl tweet out the rest of them," he said, smiling. "I've got some pretty good ones."

That goes for his dunks and drawings.

http://www.deseretnews.com/article/865567722/Utah-Jazz-Dunk-champ-or-drawing-champ-Salt-Lake-Temple-gets-Jeremy-Evans-treatment.html

Link to comment

Not A-leted, not B-leted, not C-leted, but DE-LETETED! ;)

Link to comment

No we should remove all bad art. So 90-95% of it for an off the cuff conservative estimate?

Only if *I* get to be the one that decides what is 'bad art' and what is not.

And of course, this wouldn't be a case of "Those who can, do, those who can't critique those who do," would it? ;)

(It's amazing how vastly the art critics outnumber the artists in the world! ;)

)

Link to comment

I looked at it and enjoyed a work well done instead of trying to find fault with it.

Agreed...people are too quick to point out flaws. I think the point of the thread is the player was inspired by the beauty of the building. I come from a big city...from pictures I used to think the Temple was much larger than it appear when I saw it the first time. But I love that place, especially after seeing "Mountain of the Lord", which I think is the best movie the Church ever produced. Also it is a building that inspires some to greater faith and others to hate us...

Link to comment

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Similar Content

    • By Maestrophil
      So I have shared before that of all my 6 kids, we have 4 that want nothing to do with the church, one that has been sealed in the temple, but seem to struggle with activity, WOW, garments, etc. and one couple that talks as if they have a testimony, but have never chosen to attend the temple, or church since being married.  
      This weekend, I had the good fortune to spend time with all my kids and have some good conversations.  My DIL, who is the wife in the last couple I mentioned was talking about how she has a 'strong testimony the gospel is true' but doesn't like the 'culture'.  I mentioned we all struggle with various aspects of the culture, and then felt to ask her if they ever saw themselves choosing to be sealed int he temple.  She said she didn't think so - when I asked why, she said it was because she "doesn't feel bad about having chosen to live with André (my son) before they were married."  She said she feels that was the right choice for them, and that because of this, she doesn't think she would be able to get a recommend.  
      I know that they are faithful to each other, so chastity is not a current issue, but it got me to thinking - how would a bishop respond if such a young woman came in asking for a recommend, admitted that she lived with her husband before they married, but have now been married for a few years.  Would the issue of regret come up if she didn't bring it up?  What if it did and she said she didn't regret the choice?  I'm glad I am not a bishop. 😉  Of course, I know the mantle and the spirit are with bishops so they are fit for the task.
      So, is there any advice I could or should offer my son and DIL?  Should I not follow up on the conversation at all?  It's hard with adult kids to know where to draw the line between being a parent and giving them a wide enough birth to be free-agents and adults.  
       
       
    • By latterdaytemplar
      I was recently interviewed by Saints Unscripted to address doubts that some Latter-day Saints may have regarding Freemasonry and the influence that it has historically had on the Church, as well as a description of what Masonry is. I thought that I would share it here.
      Not in the Interview
      One reason for joining Freemasonry that was not mentioned in the interview is that I had heard rumors concerning Joseph Smith stealing Masonic ceremonies and passing them off as revelation; with doubts growing, I decided to become a Mason for myself to see if those rumors were true. My doubts on this matter were resolved and my faith strengthened due to the information presented in this interview. In essence, I have come to the conclusion that Joseph Smith adopted the Masonic teaching model (concepts of theatrical presentation, of physical gestures for tokens, of illustrative symbols, etc.) and adapted it to teach the Church's already-existing, unique doctrine and to make covenants with God.
       
       
    • By Maestrophil
      Hi all.
       
      My wife and I have been reading in Ezekiel and have come to the part about the temple that is to be build in Jerusalem at the second coming.  Ezekiel gives great detail about the dimensions and layout of the temple, which is very unlike what current temples are, and much like the temples of old.  He also describes what will be done in tis temple - and much of it is animal sacrifice and offerings etc.
      My question is - how does this square with the idea that the temple is to be built by Jews who have accepted Jesus (and presumably joined the church) at his second coming?  Why would animal sacrifice be practiced there at all?  I have looked a bit online, and can't seem to find anything talking about this. 
      Thanks!
      MP
       
    • By HappyJackWagon
      I've been hearing rumors since the last conference that there will be some significant changes to the ways we experience and worship in the temple. Most significantly I'm hearing that there is an effort afoot to shorten the endowment to help reduce the logjam of names. As we know, a person (or group) can go to the temple and be baptized for 150 people within the same time it takes a person to do 1 endowment. I've long wondered about this discrepancy and how it could easily cause an imbalance in temple work. I've seen temples limit the number of baptisms one person could do. For a while on youth trips each youth was limited to just 5 names even though we had time to do more. So it would make sense to me to somehow shorten the endowment. Changes have been made before so I don't see any reason why it couldn't be done.
      With that general background, I'm also hearing that Pres. Nelson wants temple worship to be his legacy. For that to be the case I would suspect some significant changes would be needed, else why would it be "his" legacy. He is definitely a mover and a shaker, making things happen quickly so I think it fits his personality to move with changes he may have been considering for many years. In general I enjoy his ambition and determination to make things happen.
      I'm also hearing about mandatory meetings in early January for all temple workers where supposedly they will be informed of these changes so they can be prepared. Perhaps January meetings for all temple workers is a totally normal thing (I don't know as I've only ever served as a veil worker).
      So, it makes sense to me that changes could come, as early as the next few weeks. So I've got a couple of questions.
      1- Would you welcome changes to the length of time it takes to perform temple ordinances? (I call these efficiency changes)
      2- Is the family history/temple approval system adequate for temple work to move forward in a faster way? IOW- will there be enough names (without duplication) to keep up a faster pace?
      3- Are there other changes (besides efficiency) that you might expect to see?
      *Please keep the discussion respectful, both to each other and also to the temple rituals. There are a couple of specific items/topics regarding temple worship that shouldn't be discussed.
    • By nuclearfuels
      With all the new Temples being announced and my excitement builds at attending the dedications of said Temples, can the experts on this forum and the Journal of Discourse experts comment as to a future Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints Temple on Mount Horeb (Moses and the Burning Bush site)? Perhaps during the Millennium?
×
×
  • Create New...