JustAnAustralian

And as predicted, they picked up on the changes: Filed 06/22/21 - Intervenors’ Reply Memorandum in Support of Motion to Intervene A few bits from just the introductory section

You could be part of James Huntsman's legal team with that line.

About $210million according to this article which includes a map https://www.nwpb.org/2021/06/18/major-swath-of-easterday-land-in-southeast-washington-goes-for-nearly-210-million-at-auction/

I don't see it as any different to Him comparing Joseph Smith to Job.

I've also read that females are more likely to be bisexual than males, but that was quite a while ago. Would be interesting to see if there is statistically significant sex difference for each category.

Dieter F Uchortdorf said that "after" shouldn't be read as "because of". https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/general-conference/2015/04/the-gift-of-grace?lang=eng

Would be interesting to see a longitudinal study of these GenZ respondents to see if there is any variation as they get older.

Well that's what we expect. But if person 2 sued him, I wonder how this judge would rule. The straight man isn't a member of a protected class, and yet he's asking for essentially the thing as person 4.

Given the stats on LGBT around 10% of the generic chocolate cakes he makes would be for LGBT people and have nothing to do with LGBT related functions, and he seems perfectly happy to do that. But consider 4 options 1) a straight man orders a blue/pink cake to celebrate his 4yo twin boy and girl's birthday 2) a straight man orders a blue/pink cake to celebrate his 20yo child's transition 3) a transperson orders a blue/pink cake to celebrate their 4yo twin boy and girl's birthday 4) a transperson orders a blue/pink cake to celebrate their transition 1 - every

While in a car with someone else to be a witness https://www.them.us/story/trans-woman-won-against-masterpiece-cakeshop-after-being-denied-service

That's one time we know of. It makes it pretty clear though that she wasn't just making criticism of policies.

Don't forget to make sure your bishoprics have watched the finances/sacred funds video together. One of the easiest things to get pinged on, yet pretty much the easiest thing to avoid getting pinged on.

Are you forgetting that she called them patriarchal pricks?

I'd be happy if threads just stayed on topic.

June 15: Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Amended Complaint Filed by Suzanne Goldberg, U.S. Department of Education. (Federighi, Carol) ORDER: Granting Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer . Answer is due by 7/9/2021. Ordered by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (ck)