Jump to content
Seriously No Politics ×

More Cultural and Moral Decay


Recommended Posts

Posted
10 minutes ago, ttribe said:

I did. It doesn't get any better as it continues.

If I were involved in Fair, I wouldn’t want to be associated with that. Fair is supposed to support the LDS church, not make church members look like cranks. I suspect this is going to backfire badly. 

Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, Durangout said:

I didn’t compare cross dressing to murder. I was making an analogy between a dragshow for kids ( the purpose of course is to groom children to accept and corrupt themselves w evil acts) but you knew that.  

can I assume that you approve of drag shows for adults and kids?  Do you approve of grooming kids to gay / transgender life styles?

 

The “purpose of course” is doing a LOT of heavy lifting in that statement.

It is amazing. Does no one realize that drag shows and even family-friendly drag shows have been around for a long time. Then suddenly some talking heads start opining, without evidence, that these constitute “grooming” (a neat rhetorical trick to imply child abuse and pedophilia without having to prove it) and suddenly they are the root of all evil. What changed? Just people being told who the enemy is? Were they the enemy the whole time or did they become the enemy when the propagandists decided they are now? DANCE PUPPETS! DANCE!

I wonder why they are so quick to scream pedophile when clergy child abuse scandals are so prevalent and a disproportionate number of people on the side making the accusations seem to have quite a problem with the whole child sex abuse thing. Projection? Attempting to set up a “both sides” thing? Or just hatred?

Edited by The Nehor
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, Durangout said:

the purpose of course is to groom children to accept and corrupt themselves w evil acts

Quote

Do you approve of grooming kids to gay / transgender life styles?

It's not grooming!! :beatdeadhorse:

Edited by MiserereNobis
Posted
7 minutes ago, MiserereNobis said:

It's not grooming!! :beatdeadhorse:

This. Actual legit pedophile predators are going to get a lot of cover in the coming years. They can groom their victims in the tried and true predatory abuse way but when you try to describe it they might get lumped in with ‘drag show performers and being at a gay pride parade with children around’ style of grooming.

I also wonder if this ability to be soft of sex predators isn’t part of the point: https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2022/04/from-hastert-to-gaetz-lets-talk-about-republicans-and-sex-crimes.html

Posted
34 minutes ago, The Nehor said:

Does no one realize that drag shows and even family-friendly drag shows have been around for a long time.

I’ve got a picture of my Grandpa circa 1950 dressed in drag at a show in Blackfoot Idaho. They are playing the long game for sure. 

Posted
1 hour ago, SeekingUnderstanding said:

This line was my favorite:

Because parents deserve to know what’s being pushed on their children by rogue activists at BYU, because it could profoundly harm their faith”

They aren’t kindergartners…

 

Parenting has gone off the deep end these last few years.

Posted
2 hours ago, The Nehor said:

Yeah. It is patronizing to college students. I am also not sure what “rogue” is meant to say beyond being inflammatory.

This. People at 18+ do not decide to be gay or lesbian or bi or transgendered. They have been dealing with it for a while now. No one picks up a flyer offering help in this area and gets sucked in even though they are confidently heterosexual.

It is also funny seeing in other places this being described as “grooming”. Now “grooming” applies to adults? That word can mean anything now.

I feel sorry for college students whose parents treat them like small children.

Posted
29 minutes ago, jkwilliams said:

Thank you for that. Imagine, these are real people with real feelings and experiences. Who knew?

No, I am sure that they are just incurably depraved instead.

Posted
2 hours ago, california boy said:

Several years ago, some friends of him encouraged him to try drag.  He really had no interest in dressing up as a woman, but he didn’t want to disappoint them.  By then, he had found a community that accepted him for what he was.  What he found is that he could create a stage persona that was everything he was not, confident, attention getting, beloved by an audience, while the whole time hiding behind the sequins and outlandish makeup.  It was not just a performance, but an empowerment that he had never felt in his entire life.  He felt like for the first time, he had control of his life, even if it was just during those performances.

Why the necessity of doing that as female.  Why can’t someone do an over the top character as male?

Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, Calm said:

Why the necessity of doing that as female.  Why can’t someone do an over the top character as male?

I'm just speculating, but I'm guessing it makes it a 100% departure from the person who has been hiding for it to be in drag.

Edited by ttribe
Posted (edited)
Quote

 

they wear their sequin dress and outlandish make up as their armor and war paint against their painful past.  Maybe the ones that choose the most provocative names are the ones that are lashing out against all those “christians” that instead of offering love and understanding, told them throughout their growing up years that they were broken.

Can you understand that some women feel men doing drag are appropriating what should belong to women rather than using what is their own to accomplish whatever needs to be accomplished and by doing so, the men are helping create a caricature of what womanhood is?

An analogy, one is uncomfortable living on a plot of land because it is filled with fire hazards.  Instead of working on their own land to be safe, they instead choose to move in on another’s plot of land that looks like just what they want and claim squatters’ rights.  And while there, they treat the land the same way and turn their neighbour’s field into a fire hazard or some other less than beautiful and useful state.

Added:  as CV points out, this parallels in some women’s views cultural appropriation and to do it as over the top entertainment, often with humor, it does seem strange that what would be viewed as inappropriate when it comes to race or ethnicity is somehow acceptable when it comes to sex.

Edited by Calm
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, Calm said:

Can you understand that some women feel men doing drag are appropriating what should belong to women rather than using what is their own to accomplish whatever needs to be accomplished and by doing so, the men are helping create a caricature of what womanhood is?

An analogy, one is uncomfortable living on a plot of land because it is filled with fire hazards.  Instead of working on their own land to be safe, they instead choose to move in on another’s plot of land that looks like just what they want and claim squatters’ rights.  And while there, they treat the land the same way and turn their neighbour’s field into a fire hazard or some other less than beautiful and useful state.

I’m wondering why, if the exaggerated race, addiction and other stereotypes of yesteryear are no longer funny, why are sexually exaggerated female characters played by men becoming so popular – what kind of entertainment void is being filled here? Seems like it will eventually be viewed as heartless, chauvinistic, ignorant, bigoted, cruel and behind the times as these other types are, which also undermined human empathy, respect, acceptance and diversity. Except perhaps in a fantastical, meta-humorous way, which is way over kids’ heads no matter how family-friendly it is supposed to be. What will replace it, and what identity-centric artistic outlet will those who find it therapeutic apply next?

Edited by CV75
Posted
50 minutes ago, CV75 said:

I’m wondering why, if the exaggerated race, addiction and other stereotypes of yesteryear are no longer funny, why are sexually exaggerated female characters played by men becoming so popular – what kind of entertainment void is being filled here? Seems like it will eventually be viewed as heartless, chauvinistic, ignorant, bigoted, cruel and behind the times as these other types are, which also undermined human empathy, respect, acceptance and diversity. Except perhaps in a fantastical, meta-humorous way, which is way over kids’ heads no matter how family-friendly it is supposed to be. What will replace it, and what identity-centric artistic outlet will those who find it therapeutic apply next?

They aren’t “becoming so popular”. They are experiencing a slight craze right now because they have become a target so the news is full of all the latest updates on their latest perversities.

Interesting we have gone from “groomers” to “groomers who are unfairly appropriating ‘female culture.’” Is there no depths to which these ungodly perverts will not sink? I mean, I went years without even noticing them and now they are the root of all evil.

Posted (edited)

Nehor, can you explain the difference than to me between men performing drag and whites performing war dances in full regalia for entertainment or for them to express their inner warrior?  (Not being sarcastic here)
 

I have never ever called drag performing grooming and I don’t see how it can be.

Plus I have never been comfortable with drag performances from my youth because to me it feeds female stereotyping.

Edited by Calm
Posted
1 hour ago, Calm said:

Why the necessity of doing that as female.  Why can’t someone do an over the top character as male?

I did the AIDS Lifecycle (bike) ride from San Francisco to Los Angeles for several years.  Their was this one drag queen that would dress up in a completely different outfit every day of the week long ride and stand at the top of the steepest hill of the day to encourage riders to make it up the hill.  Sometimes they would almost get to the top and she would run down and push their bikes up the last little bit, helping them reach their goal.  One day, I was having a meal and this man came and set next to me.  We started talking and it was only by him telling me that he was the drag queen that I had seen at the top of the hill did I recognize him.

I am guessing that dressing up as a woman gives the person complete freedom to become someone that they totally are not.  They can hide behind the outrageous make up, over the top wigs and flashy dresses.  You see them as someone completely different.  I think for many drag queens, they want to hide behind that second persona.  Like my friend that I met this week, it allowed him to shed completely this shy, very introverted self, to become something, even briefly, totally different that he couldn't be, for whatever reason, in real life.   

A man dressing as a man is just a change of clothing.  A man dressing as a woman, allows for a complete transformation.  Maybe rewatch Victor/Victoria or Some Like it Hot to give you a better idea of the difference.

Posted (edited)
45 minutes ago, The Nehor said:

They aren’t “becoming so popular”. They are experiencing a slight craze right now because they have become a target so the news is full of all the latest updates on their latest perversities.

Interesting we have gone from “groomers” to “groomers who are unfairly appropriating ‘female culture.’” Is there no depths to which these ungodly perverts will not sink? I mean, I went years without even noticing them and now they are the root of all evil.

In many mainstream circles it has been becoming a very popular means of introducing DEI, and getting backlash for it. Sure, the popularity and rejection are generated by awareness from the popular media and press, ads on streaming services, etc. but the topic is found on all kinds of news outlets both supportive of the causse and not for at least 5 years (per my google search). I’m not sure why some people were aware of that and others not.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2022/08/12/drag-mainstream-attacks-crossroads/

https://www.billboard.com/music/music-news/drag-in-pop-culture-2017-8062558/

Yes, of course the trend is short-lived; that was part of my point: these trends are shorter-liveder every year, to be replaced by something more exaggerated and identity-centric. Whether it’s a good trend or bad trend for DEI/society, that’s a bad lifespan and bad direction.

Not sure how my post generated a reaction about grooming.

Edited by CV75
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...