Jump to content
Seriously No Politics ×

If jospeh smith was here today


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Up front I just want to say, I have read every bit of anti literature and hate speech on Joseph Smith (and of the church for matter). That has been balanced by I what read and I have read as much as humanly possible of inspired church literature.  My feelings have never changed on Joseph.  As a young 18 yo I gained a pure testimony of him as I listened to the missionary teach my now wife, then my girlfriend the discussions.  During that experience in a way that I cannot articulate what power entered my heart about him being a prophet.  I served in a senior leadership role in the church and a thought that constantly entertained my mind was I wonder what Joseph would say if he was here now,  I wonder how he would fell about all the temples dedicated and be built.  I wonder how he would feel about his prophecies coming to pass about temples  covering  the earth.  He (Joseph) never built a chapel only temples. 

What do you think he might say if he had 15 mins at the next general conference.  I think he would weep, glory God and the son then tell us how much he loved us and to keep pressing forward.  I think he would as President Nelson would and leave a with his promised blessings.

Edited by pcarthew
Posted
1 hour ago, pcarthew said:

Up front I just want to say, I have read every bit of anti literature and hate speech on Joseph Smith (and of the church for matter).

Hyperbole?

Posted
1 hour ago, The Nehor said:

Hyperbole?

No not at all, I guess I am making the point that I am not interested in having a discussion about the virtues of Joseph smith, other that my position is that he is a prophet and in that frame, I wonder what he would think of the church today.

Posted

Interestingly, I was sitting in sacrament meeting this afternoon, and I could see the early apostles right at home in our meeting. I suspect the Prophet Joseph would feel the same way ... and rejoice over all those things you identified.

Posted
3 hours ago, pcarthew said:

No not at all, I guess I am making the point that I am not interested in having a discussion about the virtues of Joseph smith, other that my position is that he is a prophet and in that frame, I wonder what he would think of the church today.

It is not hyperbole you have read every thing anti ever written about Joseph Smith? Including mentions in obscure 19th century newspapers? Every tract ever printed? I am saying it is probably impossible. Most likely some of the “every” was lost to the ages.

Posted
1 hour ago, The Nehor said:

It is not hyperbole you have read every thing anti ever written about Joseph Smith? Including mentions in obscure 19th century newspapers? Every tract ever printed? I am saying it is probably impossible. Most likely some of the “every” was lost to the ages.

I should have said "available" to me? I profusely apologise to using words that would indicate anything other that the truth.

Posted
8 hours ago, pcarthew said:

Up front I just want to say, I have read every bit of anti literature and hate speech on Joseph Smith (and of the church for matter). That has been balanced by I what read and I have read as much as humanly possible of inspired church literature.  My feelings have never changed on Joseph.  As a young 18 yo I gained a pure testimony of him as I listened to the missionary teach my now wife, then my girlfriend the discussions.  During that experience in a way that I cannot articulate what power entered my heart about him being a prophet.  I served in a senior leadership role in the church and a thought that constantly entertained my mind was I wonder what Joseph would say if he was here now,  I wonder how he would fell about all the temples dedicated and be built.  I wonder how he would feel about his prophecies coming to pass about temples  covering  the earth.  He (Joseph) never built a chapel only temples. 

What do you think he might say if he had 15 mins at the next general conference.  I think he would weep, glory God and the son then tell us how much he loved us and to keep pressing forward.  I think he would as President Nelson would and leave a with his promised blessings.

He'd be excommunicated.  And he probably wouldn't care.

Posted
8 hours ago, pcarthew said:

  I wonder how he would fell about all the temples dedicated and be built.  I wonder how he would feel about his prophecies coming to pass about temples  covering  the earth.  He (Joseph) never built a chapel only temples.

Joseph understood the true purpose of the temple.  Every community he envisioned was based around it.

Posted
1 hour ago, pcarthew said:

I should have said "available" to me? I profusely apologise to using words that would indicate anything other that the truth.

Please don’t think I am offended. I was just being a pedantic jerk and having fun with it. It wasn’t a deceptive comment.

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, JLHPROF said:

He'd be excommunicated.  And he probably wouldn't care.

I never understood this sentiment. It seems extremely short sighted.

If JSjr was around today, he would be very comfortable, mostly because he has been seeing how everything has progressed and has seen, from the spirit world, how the gospel has continued to progress and how mistakes he and others who initiated the restoration were corrected in later dispensations.

Joseph Smith is physically dead, but he is still around witnessing the restoration of the gospel. 
 

Now, if the question was “what if we transported 1840 Joseph Smith to today, then maybe there would be a different answer.

If 1840 Joseph Smith came today and was upset with what he saw, it would not affect me, nor should it affect anyone. This is not the church of Joseph Smith. The goal of the church isn’t to align its teachings as closely as we can to the ideals of Joseph Smith. We are aligning with God and God did not reveal everything there is to reveal to Joseph Smith. Additionally, there are issues in our day that were not on Joseph’s mind in 1840.

You must have one of the flowing assumptions to believe there would be problems if Joseph showed up today:

- There is no spirit world and the POS is false as is all other teachings of the church. Therefore, The only Joseph to bring today would be the dead 1940 version. If Joseph Smith was in the spirit world, why would we not bring him to our imaginary scenario instead of the 1940 version?

- The Joseph version of the church is closest to the truth and ever since he died, God stopped talking to man and we have been trying to get closer to Joseph’s vision. 

- The church today is doing something you dont like so you believe there is some amount of apostasy happening and all the early Prophets would agree with you.

- Joseph would believe he would have more authority than the current prophet. This is simply not true. The modern day prophet is more important than dead prophets. Authority doesn’t get watered down with every new prophet.

Edited by Fether
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, JLHPROF said:

He'd be excommunicated.  And he probably wouldn't care.

To be fair they would have to educate him first. 
1. no beer drinking. Ever. It is now a commandment even though the wow as delivered to him personally doesn’t say that. Also no cigar and pipe smoking. Ever. If he does- no temple. 
2. no home teaching or ministering by yourself to talk fathers into handing over their teenage girls or even their wife for marriage in exchange for exaltation..also it is a crime to marry more than one woman so no more law breaking. It was against the law back then and it still is except we obey it nowadays. 
3. The church isn’t in charge of a theocracy anymore. We don’t make our own laws and burn down news businesses because they print embarrassing truths. The salt lake trib cannot just be torched one night by a deputized mob. 
4. council of fifty dead on arrival. He isn’t gonna be the king of the world and even in Utah no one is gonna put up with the church dictating every move both at church and in the community. 
 

anyway yea they would have to give him a chance to at least be educated can’t just go around excommunicating people. 

I think he would be disappointed at how weak our leadership is. Wearing masks and closing the chapels and temples? He would have had us stand up to the govt for sure. 

Edited by secondclasscitizen
Typo
Posted
56 minutes ago, The Nehor said:

I was just being a pedantic jerk

My mom would tell me to get my PJ on and I would and then she'd be mad at me. Childhood was confusing.

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Fether said:

I never understood this sentiment. It seems extremely short sighted.

If JSjr was around today, he would be very comfortable, mostly because he has been seeing how everything has progressed and has seen, from the spirit world, how the gospel has continued to progress and how mistakes he and others who initiated the restoration were corrected in later dispensations.

Joseph Smith is physically dead, but he is still around witnessing the restoration of the gospel. 
 

Now, if the question was “what if we transported 1840 Joseph Smith to today, then maybe there would be a different answer.

If 1840 Joseph Smith came today and was upset with what he saw, it would not affect me, nor should it affect anyone. This is not the church of Joseph Smith. The goal of the church isn’t to align its teachings as closely as we can to the ideals of Joseph Smith. We are aligning with God and God did not reveal everything there is to reveal to Joseph Smith. Additionally, there are issues in our day that were not on Joseph’s mind in 1840.

You must have one of the flowing assumptions to believe there would be problems if Joseph showed up today:

- There is no spirit world and the POS is false as is all other teachings of the church. Therefore, The only Joseph to bring today would be the dead 1940 version. If Joseph Smith was in the spirit world, why would we not bring him to our imaginary scenario instead of the 1940 version?

- The Joseph version of the church is closest to the truth and ever since he died, God stopped talking to man and we have been trying to get closer to Joseph’s vision. 

- The church today is doing something you dont like so you believe there is some amount of apostasy happening and all the early Prophets would agree with you.

- Joseph would believe he would have more authority than the current prophet. This is simply not true. The modern day prophet is more important than dead prophets. Authority doesn’t get watered down with every new prophet.

I agree wholeheartedly with this. Fanciful suppositions about Joseph not recognizing or approving of the Church today ignore the probability that he has carried forth an ongoing role in the Restoration and has been fully in touch with the progress and development of the Kingdom on both this and the other side of the veil. 

Edited by Scott Lloyd
Posted
1 hour ago, Scott Lloyd said:

I agree wholeheartedly with this. Fanciful suppositions about Joseph not recognizing it approving of the Church today ignore the probability that he has carried forth an ongoing role in the Restoration and has been fully in touch with the progress and development of the Kingdom on both this and the other side of the veil. 

If you mean he's watched the course of the Church since his martyrdom and had some influence on it I agree wholeheartedly.  And his part is not finished.

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Fether said:

Joseph would believe he would have more authority than the current prophet. This is simply not true. The modern day prophet is more important than dead prophets.

Oh I guarantee he has more authority than the current prophet.  More than any subsequent prophet.  Some of those prophets realized that.

Quote

how the gospel has continued to progress and how mistakes he and others who initiated the restoration were corrected in later dispensations.

:rofl: that's funny.

Except not really :sad:.  It's just sad that you believe that.

Edited by JLHPROF
Posted (edited)

I suppose it depends on which version of Joseph Smith you are hypothesizing is speaking at conference. One who has no memory of what has happened here on earth between now and his death or one who has seen the events of the last 170ish years? Maybe it is a version of Smith who learned after he died that Zoroastrianism is actually the one true religion? (For a great short story by the LDS author Steven Peck on just this topic, see A Short Stay in Hell )

I suspect if it were the version who had no knowledge of the past 170ish years, the first thing he might say at conference is: Wow! we are still here! Followed by, "My this is a great and spacious building." 😉

Edited by CA Steve
Posted
4 hours ago, JLHPROF said:

He'd be excommunicated.  And he probably wouldn't care.

There's a couple ways this statement can be taken and when I read it, I think you mean if Joseph was here today, he'd be kicken arse and taken names, he wouldn't care what anyone else thought of him. Or did I read what you meant totally wrong?

Posted
35 minutes ago, smac97 said:

Fifth: I really love the Church.  It's a wonderful organization.  Not perfect, but it's doing a lot of good.  And more than that, it is the repository of the priesthood and all those things that come with it (saving ordinances, revelation, offices, governance, etc.).

Rep point for the amount of work you put into that post.  I agree with this part.

And for the record I also really love the Church too having been born and raised here. I was showing my children my primary graduation certificate the other week and talking to them about my time in primary.

I could throw out a few quotes and scriptures of my own but it's not necessary.  It is far better in the Church than anywhere else.  God and his Son will right the many issues eventually.  And I'm positive Joseph will be very happy with the end result.

Posted
15 hours ago, pcarthew said:

...................... Joseph Smith............. I wonder how he would feel about his prophecies coming to pass about temples  covering  the earth.  He (Joseph) never built a chapel only temples. ........................

We already know how some non-LDS oberservers felt about him.  In 1844 Josiah Quincy visited with Joseph in Nauvoo.  Later he had this to say:

Quote

        It is by no means improbable that some future text-book, for the use of generations yet unborn, will contain a question something like this: What historical American of the nineteenth century has exerted the most powerful influence upon the destinies of his countrymen?  And it is by no means impossible that the answer to that interrogatory may be thus written: Joseph Smith, the Mormon prophet.  And the reply, absurd as it doubtless seems to most men now living, may be an obvious commonplace to their descendants.  History deals in surprises and paradoxes quite as startling as this.  The man who established a religion in this age of free debate, who was and is to day accepted by hundreds of thousands as a direct emissary from the Most High – such a rare human being is not to be disposed of by pelting his memory with unsavory epithets.  Fanatic, impostor, charlatan he may have been; but these hard names furnish no solution to the problem he presents to us.  Fanatics and impostors are living and dying every day, and their memory is buried with them; but the wonderful influence which this founder of a religion exerted and still exerts throws him into relief before us, not as a rogue to be criminated, but as a phenomenon to be explained.  Quincy, Figures of the Past (1882/1883/1926), 376; B. H. Roberts, A Comprehensive History of the Church, II:349-350.  Only forty-three days after Quincy’s May 1844 visit to Nauvoo, Joseph was dead.

Prof. Harold Bloom of Yale said of Joseph:

Quote

I myself can think of not another American, except for Emerson and Whitman, who so moves and alters my own imagination.  So self-educated was he that he transcends Emerson and Whitman in my imaginative response, and takes his place with the great figures of our fiction, since at moments he appears larger than life, in the mode of a Shakespearean character.  So rich and so varied a personality, so vital a spark of divinity, is almost beyond the limits of the human, as we normally construe those limits.  Bloom, American Religion (1992), 127.

As Joseph Smith himself said on May 12, 1844, specifically placing himself as a key element in fulfillment of Daniel 2:31-45:  

Quote

 I intend to lay a foundation that will revolutionize the whole world.

In the process of doing so, as Prof. Jan Shipps has noted, Joseph played many roles, particularly in renewal and replication of the biblical past: He was not only the modern translator, revelator, seer, and prophet, but he also took on the offices of Moses the deliverer, Joshua the commander, Solomon the king, Isaiah the prophet, Eli the high priest, Peter the church founder, and Paul the missionary to the Gentiles. Shipps, Mormonism: The Story of a New Religious Tradition (1985), 37-39.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...