Jump to content
Seriously No Politics ×

“Into the millennium” - Pres. Nelson


Recommended Posts

Posted

In his talk, he stated that the foundation being restored under the SLC temple will take “it into the millennium”.

Anyone know how long that new foundation is built to last?

Posted
12 minutes ago, strappinglad said:

1000 years ,hence a millennium. 😉

Well, a thousand years plus whatever it takes to get to that point.

I think I heard him suggest that more changes are to come on what happens in the temple.

Posted

Perhaps more changes will come in the form of a letter and he just wanted to set the stage as Bluebell said. After all, there is only so much that can be said about temple ordinances in conference. 

Posted

It did fell like he was leading up to something. Maybe more changes to temple work will be coming in the near future.

1 hour ago, Wilderland said:

It felt to me like his talk was building to some announcements, and then he backed off. 

 

Posted
18 minutes ago, Ragerunner said:

It did fell like he was leading up to something. Maybe more changes to temple work will be coming in the near future.

 

He in fact said there would be changes in the future, but I don’t think he said “near future.” I could be wrong. I’ll have to review it. 

Posted (edited)
18 hours ago, bluebell said:

He did seem to be setting the stage.   It could be though that, while he expects there to be changes in the future, he was mostly addressing the trouble some members have with the changes that have already happened.

That’s the gist I got from it. 
 

I think we should be wary of the tendency to see something apocalyptic in everything the prophet says. 

Edited by Scott Lloyd
Posted
5 hours ago, Ragerunner said:

It did fell like he was leading up to something. Maybe more changes to temple work will be coming in the near future.

 

He said

"Current adjustments in Temple procedures, and others that will follow, are continuing evidence that the Lord is actively directing His church"

Posted
9 minutes ago, JAHS said:

He said

"Current adjustments in Temple procedures, and others that will follow, are continuing evidence that the Lord is actively directing His church"

“Others that will follow” is open ended. He might have meant in the near future, but that’s not what he said. 

Posted

What were the problems with the existing foundation that required repairs/ beefing up ? I recall that the original foundation stones were sandstone and they were changed to granite . 

Posted
18 minutes ago, strappinglad said:

What were the problems with the existing foundation that required repairs/ beefing up ? I recall that the original foundation stones were sandstone and they were changed to granite . 

The very bottom of the foundation is still sandstone.  See pictures at https://www.deseret.com/2018/5/13/20644956/is-the-foundation-of-the-salt-lake-temple-composed-of-granite-or-sandstone.  That story also talks about the foundation and the history around it.

Photos of the foundation from the current renovation can be found at https://newsroom.churchofjesuschrist.org/article/temple-square-renovation-project-updates-august-and-september-2020

 

 

Posted
19 hours ago, Fether said:

In his talk, he stated that the foundation being restored under the SLC temple will take “it into the millennium”.

Anyone know how long that new foundation is built to last?

I don't know but I'm "into" the Millennium too :)

 

Posted
On 10/3/2021 at 1:47 PM, Wilderland said:

It felt to me like his talk was building to some announcements, and then he backed off. 

Me, too, but I'm sure it's our imagination. ;) 

There will be no announcement ... before its time.

Posted
On 10/3/2021 at 1:47 PM, bluebell said:

He did seem to be setting the stage.   It could be though that, while he expects there to be changes in the future, he was mostly addressing the trouble some members have with the changes that have already happened.

that's what I was thinking as well, he seemed to be quelling contrary commentary and maybe? opening it up for future change

Posted
On 10/3/2021 at 1:29 PM, Fether said:

In his talk, he stated that the foundation being restored under the SLC temple will take “it into the millennium”.

Anyone know how long that new foundation is built to last?

Not long enough.  The millennium is a fantasy. Has heen for 2000 years.

Posted (edited)
49 minutes ago, Teancum said:

Not long enough.  The millennium is a fantasy. Has heen for 2000 years.

Ipse dixit?  Mmmm-kay!  You heard it here first, Folks!  Teancum has spoken!  Shut 'er down, Clancy!  She's pumpin' mud!  Will the last person to leave the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints please turn out the lights? ;):D   Regardless if one thinks the Millennium is "a bunch of bunk" (my phrase, but, certainly, I think it captures the attitude of skeptics), and regardless if anyone is familiar enough with the construction and engineering techniques involved, the Salt Lake Temple renovation and preservation project is an awe-inspiring undertaking.

In any event, it's worth noting that members of the Church of Jesus Christ hardly are alone in their millennialist worldview.  Though, necessarily, given the belief of the Church of Jesus Christ in modern revelation and its companion belief in an open canon, Latter-day Saint millennialist beliefs differ, in certain details, from those of other Christians, if we're wrong, we're in good company.

Edited by Kenngo1969
Posted
16 minutes ago, Teancum said:

The millennium is a fantasy. Has heen for 2000 years.

The millennium is, or will be, a reality.  

Two expressions of faith.  One is hopeless, the other hopeful.  One is nihilistic, the other optimistic.

I'll take Pascal's Wager any day of the week.

Thanks,

-Smac

Posted
13 minutes ago, Kenngo1969 said:

Ipse dixit?  Mmmm-kay!  You heard it here first, Folks!  Teancum has spoken!  Shut 'er down, Clancy!  She's pumpin' mud!  Will the last person to leave the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints please turn out the lights? ;):D 

Typical vapid response.

Posted
12 minutes ago, smac97 said:

The millennium is, or will be, a reality.  

Two expressions of faith.  One is hopeless, the other hopeful.  One is nihilistic, the other optimistic.

I'll take Pascal's Wager any day of the week.

Thanks,

-Smac

Good for you. If you want to live your life based on a fantasy that is great.  And it is not nihilistic to think it is a fantasy.  And it is not optimistic to think it is not. The latter may be called delusional.  Living in reality is not hopeless.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...