Jump to content
Seriously No Politics ×

General Conference Predictions


Recommended Posts

Posted

Great news about the Victoria BC temple, the saints have a very long and costly trip to get to the temple in Langley. Of course, there are only two stakes on Vancouver Island so I imagine it would be rather small. .

 

I found it interesting that the conferences were conducted by members of the quorum of the 12, likely because the president and his #1 are unable due to age. 

Posted
1 hour ago, bluebell said:

I have a friend who goes there often and I always thought it looked really cool.  

I went to the dedication.  Nice people and a good celebration. 

Posted
10 hours ago, MustardSeed said:

Tacoma was announced some time ago but still a designated spot is TBD. 

2022 and still waiting?  Almost as bad as Russia, and it's 2018 announcement.

Posted

Sorry, not trying to be snarky or make any sort of point.  I've caught the Temple Announcements data analysis bug, and I've discovered a surprising amount of energy on the topic.  

Posted
8 hours ago, CV75 said:

I predict the next General Conference session will take place six months from now.

Unless there is another covid-style plandemic. :diablo:

Posted
On 4/7/2024 at 11:23 PM, OGHoosier said:

Scotland finally gets a temple! May the memes rest in peace.

We were in Edinburgh just last week. We hiked Arthur's Seat even, where Orson Pratt dedicated Scotland for the preaching of the Gospel. Between that and the Victoria, BC temple (I was born in the Okanagan) this was extra special.

Posted
14 hours ago, longview said:

Unless there is another covid-style plandemic. :diablo:

It didn't stop a conference from happening so why should it stop it in 6 months?

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Rain said:

It didn't stop a conference from happening so why should it stop it in 6 months?

But it did force EVERYBODY to wear masks. :sad: Thus preventing the hearing-impaired people from being able to lip-read. :help: Even with captioning turned on, it is still NOT quite a 100%. :clapping:

Edited by longview
Posted
8 minutes ago, longview said:

But it did force EVERYBODY to wear masks. :sad: Thus preventing the hearing-impaired people from being able to lip-read. :help: Even with captioning turned on, it is still NOT quite a 100%. :clapping:

They had closed captioning.

Posted
8 minutes ago, The Nehor said:

They had closed captioning.

Which I do rely on. Please read my third sentence. It can be very disconcerting when the captioning goes off pace or it has glitches or even stops working every so often.

Posted
1 hour ago, The Nehor said:

They had closed captioning.

And you can read it online or in print. 

Posted
1 hour ago, longview said:

Which I do rely on. Please read my third sentence. It can be very disconcerting when the captioning goes off pace or it has glitches or even stops working every so often.

Wait, people read past the first sentence of a post before responding?

Weird.

Posted
15 minutes ago, The Nehor said:

Wait, people read past the first sentence of a post before responding?

Weird.

It is apparent you had less than optimal reading comprehension of my original post. Maybe you need to slow down a bit. And ponderize (a nod to Elder Nielson).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...