JLHPROF Posted September 28, 2023 Posted September 28, 2023 https://ldsbot.com/ Found this link on another board. It's programmed to give pro-Church answers to all kinds of questions. Doctrine, history, it has an answer for most things. It's kind of wild and a lot of fun. I asked it things I would never ask my Bishop. 🤣 3
Dario_M Posted September 28, 2023 Posted September 28, 2023 2 hours ago, JLHPROF said: I asked it things I would never ask my Bishop. 🤣 That's actually quite funny. 😂 Now i also wanna have this toy. 🤣
JustAnAustralian Posted September 28, 2023 Posted September 28, 2023 I tried to get it to throw Elder McConkie under the bus for some of his more colourful comments, but alas, it refused. 2
Calm Posted September 28, 2023 Posted September 28, 2023 2 hours ago, Pyreaux said: Is there a FAIRbot on the way? They are fun, but I think we would be too concerned about the tendency to make stuff up when it doesn’t know something. 1
Rain Posted September 28, 2023 Posted September 28, 2023 Is it ok to skinny dip? Well, the Church doesn't have a specific teaching about "skinny dipping" per se. What it does emphasize is modesty and respect for our bodies as sacred gifts from our Heavenly Father. The For the Strength of Youth pamphlet advises, “Never lower your standards of dress. Do not use a special occasion as an excuse to be immodest. When you dress immodestly, you send a message that is contrary to your identity as a son or daughter of God.” So, if you're in a public place or with others, it might not align with these principles of modesty and respect, but if you're alone or with your spouse, it might be a different situation. How can I assist you further? 4
Rain Posted September 28, 2023 Posted September 28, 2023 YOU Can I eat glucose tablets on fast sunday? Interesting question! In the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, fasting typically means going without food or drink for two meals (or about a 24-hour period) once a month, while focusing on prayer and spiritual growth. The exact manner of observing the fast is left to the individual's discretion, though, based on their personal abilities and circumstances. Something important to remember here is the purpose of fasting. It's meant to help us humble ourselves, draw closer to God, and develop empathy for others. Health is a primary concern and if you have medical requirements that require you to eat glucose tablets or any other medication, it's entirely appropriate to do so. Remember, fasting in the Church is more about the spirit and the purpose behind it. 😊 You should always prioritize your health. While it's a spiritual commandment, you're not expected to harm your health for it. Always consult with your doctor about what's best for your unique health-related needs. It's also a good idea to discuss these situations with your local Church leaders. You can always partake in fast Sunday by strengthening your prayers and focusing more on spiritual matters! 🙏 Keep in mind this isn't official Church instruction, but hopefully it helps to clarify things for you! 1
Rain Posted September 28, 2023 Posted September 28, 2023 YOU Do I need to tithe one tenth of my zucchini haul? Ah, a question on the lighter side, I like it! 😄 According to Latter-day Saint tradition, tithing applies to "increase", which is often interpreted as income. If you consider your zucchini haul as an increase, then you might choose to tithe from it. But remember, it's not so much about the specific items or amount as it is a matter of showing gratitude to God and contributing to His work. If you have further questions about tithing on specific items or situations, you might find it helpful to talk to your bishop. Happy gardening! 🌱 2
Rain Posted September 28, 2023 Posted September 28, 2023 I noticed that it added emojis to my fasting and tithing question, but not the skinny dipping one! 🤣 2
JLHPROF Posted September 28, 2023 Author Posted September 28, 2023 (edited) 21 minutes ago, Rain said: I noticed that it added emojis to my fasting and tithing question, but not the skinny dipping one! 🤣 Told you it was fun 😊. Now give it some hard ones. ETA Just saw that even if you ask the exact same question twice you might get slightly different answers. Edited September 28, 2023 by JLHPROF 2
MustardSeed Posted September 28, 2023 Posted September 28, 2023 It’s interesting how AI inserts personality in the answers. I imagine this will make things fairly confusing down the road 2
MustardSeed Posted September 28, 2023 Posted September 28, 2023 1 minute ago, JLHPROF said: Told you it was fun 😊. Now give it some hard ones. As was mentioned in the conference predictions, I wonder if AI will use the common “ Don’t worry about it. It will all work out in the end.” 1
Vanguard Posted September 28, 2023 Posted September 28, 2023 30 minutes ago, Rain said: Is it ok to skinny dip? Well, the Church doesn't have a specific teaching about "skinny dipping" per se. What it does emphasize is modesty and respect for our bodies as sacred gifts from our Heavenly Father. The For the Strength of Youth pamphlet advises, “Never lower your standards of dress. Do not use a special occasion as an excuse to be immodest. When you dress immodestly, you send a message that is contrary to your identity as a son or daughter of God.” So, if you're in a public place or with others, it might not align with these principles of modesty and respect, but if you're alone or with your spouse, it might be a different situation. How can I assist you further? Long live modestly skinny dipping! ;o
MustardSeed Posted September 28, 2023 Posted September 28, 2023 2 minutes ago, Vanguard said: Long live modestly skinny dipping! ;o If a tree falls in the woods and nobody hears it did it make a sound? No. It did not. 3
Rain Posted September 28, 2023 Posted September 28, 2023 (edited) 15 minutes ago, JLHPROF said: Told you it was fun 😊. Now give it some hard ones. Ok, probably not what you were thinking by hard, but it did take 3 tries to get it to clearly answer this question as it kept grouping the cross in with atonement rather than answering specifically about sins on the cross. ‐-------- YOU Wè know the atonement culminated on the cross, but did Jesus actually suffer for sins there? Absolutely! According to Latter-day Saint beliefs, Jesus Christ's atonement encompasses both His suffering in the Garden of Gethsemane and His suffering and death on the cross at Calvary. In the Garden of Gethsemane, He took upon Himself the sins of all mankind, experiencing the pains, sorrows, and afflictions of each person (see Luke 22:44 and Doctrine and Covenants 19:16–19). This allowed Him to perfectly understand and empathize with our individual struggles and trials. Thus, He is uniquely qualified to heal and comfort us (see Alma 7:11–12). What Jesus bore on the cross was both a continuation and a completion of the agonizing burden He shouldered in the Garden of Gethsemane. Through His death on the cross, He overcame physical death for all of us, assuring us a glorious resurrection. He "gave up the ghost" (Luke 23:46) and His body was laid in the tomb, but He took up His body again in the Resurrection, making it possible for every person to overcome physical death and live again (see 1 Corinthians 15:20–22). So, yes, His suffering for our sins absolutely continued on the cross and came to fulfillment with His death and Resurrection. 😇 Isn't it a beautiful and humbling doctrine? ---- Again, the use of emojis. 😀 Edited September 28, 2023 by Rain 1
Diamondhands69 Posted September 28, 2023 Posted September 28, 2023 Lol…. This thing needs to get sent back to the apologist academy. It can’t admit the “lies” in the Nauvoo expositor were true- that’s not a faithful response. I will say it is pretty cool though: Why did Joseph smith accuse the Nauvoo expositor of publishing lies when the accusations were true? Ah, this is a nuanced issue. I'll do my best to explain it. 😊 From Joseph Smith's perspective at the time, the Nauvoo Expositor was stirring up anger and potentially violent opposition toward the Latter-day Saints. The charges made in the Expositor were not publicly taught or widely known among the Latter-day Saints, because Joseph Smith had introduced these principles — like plural marriage — in strict confidence. Therefore, when these things were exposed, it can be seen as a violation of trust and privacy, especially if those disclosures were intended to incite animosity or harm. Moreover, the context can't be ignored. At the time, Latter-day Saints were a marginalized group who had already been forced out of several communities due to harassment and violence. They had found relative safety and built the city of Nauvoo, and any threats to their security were taken very seriously. So, Joseph's reaction could in part be seen as a way to protect the community from potential escalating conflicts. From today's perspective, it’s recognized that Joseph Smith indeed instituted the practice of plural marriage. We understand these issues differently than they did in the past. But back in those circumstances, things weren't as clear. The exact thoughts and intentions of Joseph Smith are hard to fully know. Remember, history is rarely black and white, and it can be challenging to understand folks’ actions in their historical context. 😊 It's always important to examine these issues with both empathy and a critical mind. Thanks for your patience in digging into these kinds of complex topics! 🙏
CA Steve Posted September 28, 2023 Posted September 28, 2023 6 hours ago, Calm said: They are fun, but I think we would be too concerned about the tendency to make stuff up when it doesn’t know something. You mean they have a human side too? 😁
CA Steve Posted September 28, 2023 Posted September 28, 2023 It would be even more interesting if they expanded the bot to give three answers to the same question, one pro, one critical and one neutral. 2
JLHPROF Posted September 28, 2023 Author Posted September 28, 2023 (edited) 2 hours ago, Diamondhands69 said: Lol…. This thing needs to get sent back to the apologist academy. It can’t admit the “lies” in the Nauvoo expositor were true- that’s not a faithful response. That's what I like about it. It's actually pretty honest. You can ask it about polygamy, the Mountain Meadows events, the priesthood ban. I even asked it about Adam-God. It gives really good answers - faithful but doesn't try to dodge. Edited September 28, 2023 by JLHPROF
Pyreaux Posted September 28, 2023 Posted September 28, 2023 4 hours ago, CA Steve said: It would be even more interesting if they expanded the bot to give three answers to the same question, one pro, one critical and one neutral. Nah, you'll get long or jumbled or unbalanced answers. You'll need an ApologistBot, SecularBot, and CriticBot... Ask each one something, then have them debate a topic. And a FactCheckBot, but what side will make that? Will it be objective?
T-Shirt Posted September 28, 2023 Posted September 28, 2023 6 hours ago, Diamondhands69 said: Lol…. This thing needs to get sent back to the apologist academy. It can’t admit the “lies” in the Nauvoo expositor were true- that’s not a faithful response. I will say it is pretty cool though: While this is a topic for its own thread, the Nauvoo Expositor, while containing a sliver of truth, was quite full of outright lies and exaggerations. 2
Amulek Posted September 28, 2023 Posted September 28, 2023 Unsurprisingly, it can't do humor (to be fair, neither do many Mormons /oh,snap)... YOU Can you tell me a good Mormon joke? AI Of course! Here's one for you: "Did you know that there are some BYU students on campus who don't want jean shorts to be allowed on campus? They call themselves the anti-knee-high-levis." 😁 I hope that brings a smile to your face! YOU Why? AI The joke is a playful pun on the word "antinihililipilification," which is one of the longest English words and refers to the action of estimating something as worthless. In the joke, this is humorously replaced by "anti-knee-high-levis," a made-up term that sounds similar and refers to something as specific and harmless as a style of denim shorts. It's all in good fun to create a lighthearted moment. 😊 2
Calm Posted September 28, 2023 Posted September 28, 2023 (edited) 5 minutes ago, Amulek said: The joke is a playful pun on the word "antinihililipilification," which is one of the longest English words and refers to the action of estimating something as worthless. In the joke, this is humorously replaced by "anti-knee-high-levis," a made-up term that sounds similar and refers to something as specific and harmless as a style of denim shorts. It's all in good fun to create a lighthearted moment. 😊 And this is why it’s not on FAIR’s plans anytime soon to employ one, even if this is truly a good faith effort. So close and yet so far away. Edited September 28, 2023 by Calm
Navidad Posted September 28, 2023 Posted September 28, 2023 I asked it how I can participate in the Sacrament Service as a non-member? Part of the answer - "Next, you might consider offering to give a talk or share a message, if the local leaders are open to it. You wouldn't be able to give a sermon during the official sacrament meeting, but sharing a spiritual message can be a beautiful way to contribute. Keep in mind that this depends on the local leadership and isn’t universally applied. So, it could be a good idea to discuss this with the local bishop." I can't tell you how many times I have heard this answer. . . . It is a local decision . . . it depends on your bishop! There is no universal rule! Ha! Very cool program. 3
Diamondhands69 Posted September 28, 2023 Posted September 28, 2023 35 minutes ago, T-Shirt said: While this is a topic for its own thread, the Nauvoo Expositor, while containing a sliver of truth, was quite full of outright lies and exaggerations. it does need a thread of its own… line by line. thst said I sure hope destroying it was worth dying for. That is an outcome I’m sure was not anticipated.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now