Jump to content
Seriously No Politics ×

New Website: abuse.lds.org


Recommended Posts

Posted

Thank you!

Just texted this to my wife, whose friend's daughter is presently in hiding from her wifebeating husband. She, the friend, is beside herself, and my wife is ministering.

Posted

Nice, I did not see this. I really wish they could do push notifications on new documents in the communications section of LDS.org but my understanding is that only happens for stake presidents who have an official email address.

Still, I wish you could sign up with a personal email tied to your account and then permissions adjusted based on calling.

Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, The Nehor said:

Nice, I did not see this. I really wish they could do push notifications on new documents in the communications section of LDS.org but my understanding is that only happens for stake presidents who have an official email address.

 

The notifications seem inconsistent.  Sometimes the bishop will get an email, other times the entire bishopric.  No apparent reason why at times.

Edited by ksfisher
Posted
3 hours ago, The Nehor said:

Still, I wish you could sign up with a personal email tied to your account and then permissions adjusted based on calling.

That's how it's supposed to work now.

Posted

I received an email notifying me of the announcement letter in my "official communications".  I am currently serving as YM president so I assume this went to all ward council leaders at a minimum.

It does, however, seem like something that needs to be shared with all members.  Perhaps that will happen shortly but they wanted to get it into leaders hands first.

I briefly perused the site and it looks like a really great collections of resources.  Very happy to see this.

Posted (edited)

I got the email too. Here's the distribution list:

General Authorities, General Auxiliary Presidencies, and the following leaders in English-speaking units: Area Seventies; Stake, Mission, and District Presidents; Bishops and Branch Presidents; Stake and Ward Councils

It's also on the homepage of lds.org.

Edited by Hamba Tuhan
Posted
4 hours ago, The Nehor said:

Nice, I did not see this. I really wish they could do push notifications on new documents in the communications section of LDS.org but my understanding is that only happens for stake presidents who have an official email address.

Still, I wish you could sign up with a personal email tied to your account and then permissions adjusted based on calling.

As the YW president I get emails notifications when new documents show up in the communication section.

Posted

Because they have no central hierarchy, the Jewish community depends for abuse prevention and treatment upon Jewish Community Watch (JCW),   http://www.jewishcommunitywatch.org/ .  They do one very essential thing which the LDS Church is not doing:  Tracking the perpetrators of abuse, the sexual predators among us who repeat their crimes again and again.  We need to be protected from them.  Here is a JCW rogues gallery, http://www.jewishcommunitywatch.org/wall-of-shame/ .

Moreover, such crimes cannot be handled internally.  There must be public prosecutions.  As the JCW points out in their Sept newsletter, attempting to handle sexual abuse internally can be disastrous:  

Posted (edited)

I wonder if I just do not count then. I am an assistant ward clerk but due to circumstances I go to all Bishopric and Ward Council meetings and basically function as a co-Ward Clerk but I thought they still get the letter and it is in my Official Communication section on LDS.org. Not a big deal but a little annoying.

Edited by The Nehor
Posted
1 hour ago, Robert F. Smith said:

Because they have no central hierarchy, the Jewish community depends for abuse prevention and treatment upon Jewish Community Watch (JCW),   http://www.jewishcommunitywatch.org/ .  They do one very essential thing which the LDS Church is not doing:  Tracking the perpetrators of abuse, the sexual predators among us who repeat their crimes again and again.  We need to be protected from them.  Here is a JCW rogues gallery, http://www.jewishcommunitywatch.org/wall-of-shame/ .

Moreover, such crimes cannot be handled internally.  There must be public prosecutions.  As the JCW points out in their Sept newsletter, attempting to handle sexual abuse internally can be disastrous:  

That sounds like a good process. 

I think we do a great disservice to ourselves by not disclosing the data on abuse within our church.  

Posted
17 minutes ago, The Nehor said:

I wonder if I just do not count then. I am an assistant ward clerk but due to circumstances I go to all Bishopric and Ward Council meetings and basically function as a co-Ward Clerk but I thought they still get the letter and it is in my Official Communication section on LDS.org. Not a big deal but a little annoying.

Any chance you might have notifications turned off?  Or they have the wrong email address?

Posted
Just now, bluebell said:

Any chance you might have notifications turned off?  Or they have the wrong email address?

I just checked. Looks like everything is on and checked junk folder. Oh well, not a big deal.

Posted

I’m hopeful that this site will get publicized to general membership in a variety of ways:  FP email blast, time on the homepage of LDS.org, Ensign article, maybe even a gen con address, etc.  The site is clearly NOT just a leader resource. 

Posted

Looks like Sam Young's hard efforts are starting to pay off.  They should have a link for the abusers that takes them to a law enforcement webpage where they can confess.

Posted
3 minutes ago, 2BizE said:

They should have a link for the abusers that takes them to a law enforcement webpage where they can confess.

If you want to confess a crime to local law enforcement, and you are on the internet already, can't you just Google your local PD? 

 

Posted
51 minutes ago, Amulek said:

If you want to confess a crime to local law enforcement, and you are on the internet already, can't you just Google your local PD? 

😂

Posted
4 hours ago, 2BizE said:

Looks like Sam Young's hard efforts are starting to pay off.

Yep.  I believe it was his efforts that prompted both this website and the letter sent to bishops and stake presidents about interview procedures. 

Posted
2 hours ago, Calm said:

I would not be surprised if his efforts contributed, but there are massive movements (for example, MeToo, the news and commentary of the domestic abuse by Rob Porter) to address abuse in our culture and considering his emphasis (bishops' interviews) was a target not changed by this website, I think to hold up him as the prime mover of this website is overdoing it and neglecting to give the credit where it should really go, which is to the victims willing to speak up and let their loved ones and leaders know how pervasive abuse is in our greater society as well as our more intimate ones of church and family.

You said it much more diplomatically that I would have. Thank you.

Posted
3 hours ago, Calm said:

I would not be surprised if his efforts contributed, but there are massive movements (for example, MeToo, the news and commentary of the domestic abuse by Rob Porter) to address abuse in our culture and considering his emphasis (bishops' interviews) was a target not changed by this website, I think to hold up him as the prime mover of this website is overdoing it and neglecting to give the credit where it should really go, which is to the victims willing to speak up and let their loved ones and leaders know how pervasive abuse is in our greater society as well as our more intimate ones of church and family.

I agree... he was a mover, not the only mover.  Whether or not he was a prime mover -- I don't know.  I think McKenna Denson was also a mover of the Church on this.  And the ex-wives of Rob Porter coming forward with their stories.

And, as we talk of the victims willing to speak up, we should remember that among the things Sam Young did (both the good and the bad) was the book of stories of abuse.  Hundreds of victims who shared their stories at Sam Young's prompting.

 

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...