Jump to content

David Axelrod Tweets About Menstruating Mormons


CQUIRK

Recommended Posts

Obama strategist David Axelrod tweeted a not-quite-decipherable message Monday that included a link to a story about Mormon women being erroneously barred from some official ceremonies because they were menstruating. Then he deleted the tweet. What does it all mean?!

"Wring URS. This is the Medicare story," Axelrod tweeted at 2:36p.m. with a link to the Salt Lake Tribune story, "Menstruating Mormons barred from temple proxy baptisms?" In that story, Peggy Flecker Stacy, reports:

"Mormon feminists recently learned that some young women were wrongly blocked from doing LDS proxy baptisms – which include wearing all-white clothing and being fully immersed in water – because they were menstruating... Trouble is, such a ban is bogus."

Interesting story, but it's not clear why Axelrod would link to it.

Whole article can be read here.

Link to comment

Sounds like it was supposed to say "wrong URL". Could be he accidentally copied that link instead of another one.

Link to comment

Wow, things one can learn about the faith from a newspaper, lol. In my 50+ years I have never heard of this at all. Supposedly this has happened in about 10 temples in the US. I would have thought it was more widely discussed if so.

Link to comment

I had heard of it before that article but being male had never experienced it first hand. After a bit of research (and a quick chat with the temple president) it appears the first presidency has already addressed this and anyone who does this is ill informed and in a state of sin.

Link to comment

Well lets see... it seems to me that Jewish women were bared from participating in Society in general (Not just religious rituals) as "unclean" until they were cleansed and their cycle subsided.

Perhaps he realized that rather than being a plus for the Obama campaign it could be looked at as Anti-semetic? I also remember as a youth that a girl in our ward didn't participate in our ward youth summer water skiing trip because of this. She just sat on the beach the whole time and I only found out about it because I was trying to through her in the water and the Leaders intervened.

Link to comment

As far as the OP goes I've got four daughters and have led many youth temple trips. They were never told not to enter the baptismal font but they have been counseled to make sure their sanitary products are secure. We also ask them to put their hair up in a pony tail - that doesn't mean we kick them out fo the temple if they have long hair.

Idiots.

Link to comment

I like how "agent of truth" says that he is a religious studies PhD...

That says it all. I missed that. Likely a graduate of the illustrious Walter Martin graduate school of Mormon bashing.

Link to comment
  • 2 weeks later...

I've participated in temple baptism trips to the Oakland temple and the Boise temple. Oakland didn't have a policy against it that I remember but the Boise temple most certainly did in the 90's. I was a YW pres. and led quite a few temple trips and the counsel was always clear and repeated once we were inside. I'm not sure if they do now or not.

Link to comment
  • 3 weeks later...

I've participated in temple baptism trips to the Oakland temple and the Boise temple. Oakland didn't have a policy against it that I remember but the Boise temple most certainly did in the 90's. I was a YW pres. and led quite a few temple trips and the counsel was always clear and repeated once we were inside. I'm not sure if they do now or not.

I didn't read the articles linked... but my word... what nonsense to try and make something out of women/girls not participating in baptisms if mensturating. Not everyone wears tampons, and preventing the possibility of blood getting into the water is one of respect for the individual(s) and the ordinance.

As an ordinance worker for six years in the Portland temple, and assigned to the baptistry when youth groups were scheduled, we followed a guideline that if girls were mensturating they did only confirmations. I personally saw that as a positive guide rather than something to be clucked at by feminists... or male critics. The white jumpsuits worn in the baptistry were made of heavy cotton material, but when wet could be revealing. Therefore, someone would stand with towels to hand to individuals exiting the font, including males.

I can't believe the practice of mensturating women not getting into the warm waters of the font could bring criticism, and be construed as "denying" access to an ordinance. If young women are so bent on performing the baptismal ordinance, let them show some sensitivity and respect and come back the next week when they are finished mensturating.

GG

Link to comment

Then Mr. Axelrod should mind his own business... and shame on "Mormon feminists" if they try and make this into "denying" access to temple ordinances.

GG

Link to comment

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Similar Content

    • By Anijen
      In reading some of the posts involving crimes [sexual assault], allegations, [Kavanaugh, President Russel Topic], or even controversial subjects such as Climate Change, Book of Mormon Geography, etc.. I have thought to myself there are a lot of faith based concepts juxtaposed up to scientific method and actual evidence. I'd like to discuss both and how it might affect our concept of that topic and what we take away.
      Personal belief systems can take root at a very early age, sometimes as a part of our cultural or ethnic identity. As a result, they are almost impossible to remove without eroding the soil of substance that gives one both a sense of identity and purpose. However, also true, as a consequence, most will not surrender a deeply held personal belief for fear it could lead to their spiritual loss or death. There is nothing wrong with personal beliefs. I, for one, am deeply faithful and active in church. Each person finds meaning and purpose in their own way and that is how it should be. There is a difference between faith and scientific method and reason. Personal faith is not a problem unless it gets in the way of objective forensic investigation and examination.
      For example; using faith based reasoning (let's say using the Bible to prove a point), the premise of an argument and the conclusion are a matter of personal belief and subsequently often considered above criticism. Those who question the premises of such beliefs, religious and otherwise dogmatic, are labeled heretics or worse. I have been called an apostate for not subscribing to a heartland theory, a racist for objecting to a safe-place policy, a climate denier for even questioning global warming (which I know there is climate change, my interests is, is it really all just man made?), a racist and a bigot for disagreeing about kneeling as a protest, a chauvinist pig for thinking men and woman are different and we should use the appropriate public bathrooms.  
      In faith and personal belief, there is little room for critical thinking and no place for doubt. As a consequence, the nature of faith runs contrary to knowledge building. My faith tells me men and women are both children of God and are different from each other, science also tells me there is a biological difference too. We still have debates to how we should act and even appropriate ways to speak. For example is refusing to bake a cake with a message one does not believe in compelling speech?
      Questions, questions, questions... When is testify via faith and testify via science appropriate and acceptable and when is it not?
    • By bcuzbcuz
      This evening, the returns are in. The "Sweden Democrats", Sweden's neo-nazi party, have won 13% of the federal election vote. Roughly 85% of the population have voted. The nine major parties have collected only enough votes to, almost exactly down the middle, split power between the right coalition and the left coalition.. And guess who gets to sit in the middle of the balance, the neo-nazis.
      All of you who said that socialism would lead to ruin, were right.
      Both left and right coalitions have said they'll have nothing to do with the SD's but time will tell. Me, I'm a pessimist. It can only get worse. The end of times is upon us.
    • By volgadon
      http://mormonliberals.org/marriner-eccles/
      A very good friend of mine wrote a fascinating piece on Mariner Eccles, one of the more influential Mormons in the 20th century, and sadly much-neglected now.
      The bit about Mariner and Reed Smoot during the depression is particularly revealing of the political and economic dynamics at play in the church.
    • By CQUIRK
      Here.
      IMO, these people are no better then the Westboro Baptist Church; both are vile, slanderous, and will go to the extreme to "further" their agenda.
×
×
  • Create New...