Jump to content
Seriously No Politics ×

Last Movie You Watched


altersteve

Recommended Posts

Posted

Well, it's Tom Hanks!  How can it be less than a great flick?

 

I may get roasted for blasphemy here but I am not so enamored by Tom Hanks.

Posted

I may get roasted for blasphemy here but I am not so enamored by Tom Hanks.

Maybe it's his political views, or views on SSM that you don't like, or is it something else?  But if you look at the talent, to me it's undeniable.  I read the other day his son has addiction problems.  Poor guy.  I'm sure it's not easy living with such a famous father.  At least he's a good husband, not unfaithful like a lot of actors can be.  Of course I use to say that about Mel Gibson. 

 

I sure liked him in this latest movie though, I can't think of a movie except for a couple that I didn't love.  Turner and Hooch...I think that's the name, didn't care for and a few others.   

Posted

Isn't he the actor that hates Mormons?

 

I don't know about that but IMNSO his acting is mediocre.  Or maybe it is the roles he plays.

Posted

I may get roasted for blasphemy here but I am not so enamored by Tom Hanks.

Get out the charcoal!!!  :diablo: 

No, not everything he's done as an actor has been worthy.  But much has been.  As to his personal politics and causes, I'm not that enamored either.

Posted

Isn't he the actor that hates Mormons?

 

Never heard of that.  Where did you hear it?

Posted

I don't know about that but IMNSO his acting is mediocre.  Or maybe it is the roles he plays.

 

Hmmmm.   "Mediocre".  Interesting assessment.  I'm not sure I agree.  In fact I am sure that I don't.  I can't think of any role he's played that seemed less than very well done.  I think that the only movie he's been in that I haven't seen is "Philadelphia".  Why do you think he's mediocre?  Any standout examples that make you feel that way?  Or do you just find him unconvincing in general?

Posted

It's not a movie, but my wife and I have been enjoying the first season of Madam Secretary on Netflix. Great writing/acting.

Also, I recently watched Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves. It was fun to see it again.

Posted

Hmmmm.   "Mediocre".  Interesting assessment.  I'm not sure I agree.  In fact I am sure that I don't.  I can't think of any role he's played that seemed less than very well done.  I think that the only movie he's been in that I haven't seen is "Philadelphia".  Why do you think he's mediocre?  Any standout examples that make you feel that way?  Or do you just find him unconvincing in general?

 

I was thinking about ERayR's opinion about Hanks' acting being "mediocre" (and I don't agree either) and thought perhaps it was because he's played so many light/romantic comedy roles... but then you mentioned Philadelphia... what a performance... in fact I think he won the Oscar for his portrayal of a man dying of AIDS who had been fired by the law firm he worked for... and his subsequent lawsuit against them... Denzel Washington gave a very good performance as his attorney... and Antonio Bandares was his partner... Joanne Woodward was his mother.  It is an excellent film.

I loved "Sleepless in Seattle" and "You've Got Mail."  These are the types of romantic comedy films we see him in most often... but then comes along a film like Philadelphia and it is obvious his range as an actor is very, very good...

 

GG

Posted (edited)

I was thinking about ERayR's opinion about Hanks' acting being "mediocre" (and I don't agree either) and thought perhaps it was because he's played so many light/romantic comedy roles... but then you mentioned Philadelphia... what a performance... in fact I think he won the Oscar for his portrayal of a man dying of AIDS who had been fired by the law firm he worked for... and his subsequent lawsuit against them... Denzel Washington gave a very good performance as his attorney... and Antonio Bandares was his partner... Joanne Woodward was his mother. It is an excellent film.

I loved "Sleepless in Seattle" and "You've Got Mail." These are the types of romantic comedy films we see him in most often... but then comes along a film like Philadelphia and it is obvious his range as an actor is very, very good...

GG

Totally agree, "Philadelphia" was amazing. I also like "Catch Me if You Can" that's a true story also. And of course love his romantic films. Just love how he can play the different rolls much like Robin Willams did. Robin, as everyone must know started out in TV with The Mork and Mindy show, just as Tom did in Bosom Buddies.

http://articles.latimes.com/2010/apr/19/entertainment/la-et-0419-bosombuddies-20100419

ERayR, what actors in Tom's era do you like? If you don't mind me asking.

Edited by Tacenda
Posted

OK, I finally saw The Martian tonight, and as I expected it was excellent.  When it comes to a sci fi movie, I am always on the lookout for bad science and I found none.  I haven't read the novel, but if a screwup were going to come it would have come in the translation from book to movie.  But it appears that Hollyweird actually got something right for once.  I'm sure if I read the book I will find that they left out something important, but the movie seems to stand alone without any problem.

 

I like that.

Posted (edited)

Y'all should go see The Walk on a big screen while it's still in theaters (probably not for long). I am afraid of heights, so I knew going in that this would make me uncomfortable, but when it got to the point of the WTC walk, I had no fear and it was a beautifully transcendent spiritual moment, unlike anything I've experienced in a film. And the connections with pressing forward with faith, following the straight and narrow, enduring to the end, etc., are all there, but not overt or pedantic. I've heard some reviews praising the wire walk but saying the rest of the film is weak, but I disagree... It's all very well done and builds up nicely to that moment.

The Martian is also great, with a positive attitude of endurance and using our ingenuity to solve problems.

Edited by Grudunza
Posted (edited)

Y'all should go see The Walk on a big screen while it's still in theaters (probably not for long). I am afraid of heights, so I knew going in that this would make me uncomfortable, but when it got to the point of the WTC walk, I had no fear and it was a beautifully transcendent spiritual moment, unlike anything I've experienced in a film. And the connections with pressing forward with faith, following the straight and narrow, enduring to the end, etc., are all there, but not overt or pedantic. I've heard some reviews praising the wire walk but saying the rest of the film is weak, but I disagree... It's all very well done and builds up nicely to that moment.

The Martian is also great, with a positive attitude of endurance and using our ingenuity to solve problems.

Saw "The Walk" last week, surprised I didn't post it. Another great film to add to the list. The Oscars and Golden Globes have their work cut out for them. Nice that I didn't have to sit through gore or a bunch of F-bombs or sex scenes too. Yay Hollyweird, as Stargazer calls it. Edited by Tacenda
Posted (edited)

The Hundred-Foot Journey. 

A very pleasant film.

 

Steven Spielberg and Oprah Winfrey were producers, and Helen Mirren played one of the lead roles, if that gives any clue as to the caliber of the film.

Edited by hagoth7
Posted

Watching "Belief" on Oprah's OWN channel. It starts out with a girl that lost her faith since being raped.. she felt like she was a broken person. I wasn't raped but understand what she means when she said she felt broken and not loved since losing her faith.

Posted (edited)

Hmmmm.   "Mediocre".  Interesting assessment.  I'm not sure I agree.  In fact I am sure that I don't.  I can't think of any role he's played that seemed less than very well done.  I think that the only movie he's been in that I haven't seen is "Philadelphia".  Why do you think he's mediocre?  Any standout examples that make you feel that way?  Or do you just find him unconvincing in general?

 

I haven't seen too many because I just steer clear of them.  I thought "Big"  was terrible.  Despite all the raves I thought "Forrest Gump was so so. Some of the philosophical take away lines are pretty good.  I liked "The Green Mile".

 

It is as you said I just find him unconvincing in general. 

 

I think Val Kilmer is a much better actor and much more versatile.

Edited by ERayR
Posted

I haven't seen too many because I just steer clear of them.  I thought "Big"  was terrible.  Despite all the raves I thought "Forrest Gump was so so. Some of the philosophical take away lines are pretty good.  I liked "The Green Mile".

 

It is as you said I just find him unconvincing in general. 

 

I think Val Kilmer is a much better actor and much more versatile.

I like Val. He just isn't out there much is he? Never mind I saw that he's been in quite a few movies. I've seen a few of them. Really liked At First Sight.
Posted

I like Val. He just isn't out there much is he? Never mind I saw that he's been in quite a few movies. I've seen a few of them. Really liked At First Sight.

He is in a lot of movies and they are in a wide range of roles. 

Posted

The Hundred-Foot Journey. 

A very pleasant film.

 

Steven Spielberg and Oprah Winfrey were producers, and Helen Mirren played one of the lead roles, if that gives any clue as to the caliber of the film.

 

I liked that movie.

Posted

He is in a lot of movies and they are in a wide range of roles. 

 

The last role I saw Val Kilmer in was a film called "De je Vu" starring Denzel Washington.  Val played an FBI man, like DW, searching for an insane "bomber" ... one of the few movies involving "time" that I really liked.  It was actually pretty believable...

Val's role was rather minor, and it was obvious he was no longer the handsome fellow he used to be.

 

GG

Posted (edited)

The last role I saw Val Kilmer in was a film called "De je Vu" starring Denzel Washington.  Val played an FBI man, like DW, searching for an insane "bomber" ... one of the few movies involving "time" that I really liked.  It was actually pretty believable...

Val's role was rather minor, and it was obvious he was no longer the handsome fellow he used to be.

 

GG

 

I am not swayed by his "handsomeness".  What I like is that he makes his characters believable and his ability to do a wide range of roles.  Mad Mordigan in Willow to Doc Holliday in Tombstone to Simon Templar in The Saint and the role you mentioned above.

Edited by ERayR
Posted

The last role I saw Val Kilmer in was a film called "De je Vu" starring Denzel Washington.  Val played an FBI man, like DW, searching for an insane "bomber" ... one of the few movies involving "time" that I really liked.  It was actually pretty believable...

Val's role was rather minor, and it was obvious he was no longer the handsome fellow he used to be.

 

GG

 

I completely forgot he was in that movie.

Posted

I am not swayed by his "handsomeness".

Unfortunately others are so he is not getting the offers for good roles as much as he used to be.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...