Nofear Posted June 7, 2022 Posted June 7, 2022 I don't tiktok and wasn't aware of this group. But, it apparently had it's following. The group seems to have imploded as a consequence of "soft swinging". That such a group would apply Mormon to their label is somewhat ... disappointing. https://www.thecut.com/2022/06/mormon-momtok-swingers-drama-explained.html 2
bluebell Posted June 7, 2022 Posted June 7, 2022 2 hours ago, Nofear said: I don't tiktok and wasn't aware of this group. But, it apparently had it's following. The group seems to have imploded as a consequence of "soft swinging". That such a group would apply Mormon to their label is somewhat ... disappointing. https://www.thecut.com/2022/06/mormon-momtok-swingers-drama-explained.html Agreed. I'm not sure if they apply the label themselves or if others have labeled them as mormon, but either way, it's easy to see that these people are not mormon in beliefs or practices. Maybe they were baptized as kids or something, but the affiliation is in name only at this point. 2
Tacenda Posted June 7, 2022 Posted June 7, 2022 (edited) 10 minutes ago, bluebell said: Agreed. I'm not sure if they apply the label themselves or if others have labeled them as mormon, but either way, it's easy to see that these people are not mormon in beliefs or practices. Maybe they were baptized as kids or something, but the affiliation is in name only at this point. It's apparently a thing in Utah. https://kutv.com/news/local/dangerous-liaisons-the-popular-state-of-swinging-in-utah Edited June 7, 2022 by Tacenda
Chum Posted June 7, 2022 Posted June 7, 2022 (edited) 3 hours ago, Nofear said: I don't tiktok and wasn't aware of this group. But, it apparently had it's following. The group seems to have imploded as a consequence of "soft swinging". That such a group would apply Mormon to their label is somewhat ... disappointing. After reading the article, I don't see where the MomTok group had anything to do with swinging. They seemed to react strongly about one of their members being into it. Edited June 7, 2022 by Chum 1
Chum Posted June 7, 2022 Posted June 7, 2022 14 minutes ago, Tacenda said: It's apparently a thing in Utah. I think it's a thing all over. Compared to other areas, Utah would be a lightweight. 2
Tacenda Posted June 7, 2022 Posted June 7, 2022 18 minutes ago, Chum said: I think it's a thing all over. Compared to other areas, Utah would be a lightweight. Yes, you're right, but what makes it a bigger thing is that some are LDS and that just doesn't sit well. None of it sits well at all.
MorningStar Posted June 7, 2022 Posted June 7, 2022 *sets timer to see how long it takes before there's a flag for swingers* 1
Chum Posted June 7, 2022 Posted June 7, 2022 4 minutes ago, Bernard Gui said: Ain’t no such thing as “soft swinging.” The article throws that term out there as if it were established but not well known. In those cases, helpful reporting spells it out in the first paragraph. Instead, it was dangled all throughout without any explanation. At the end we get some inferences at what it could mean. 2
Calm Posted June 7, 2022 Posted June 7, 2022 (edited) 1 hour ago, Tacenda said: Yes, you're right, but what makes it a bigger thing is that some are LDS and that just doesn't sit well. None of it sits well at all. I am not sure why it makes it bigger than if they were Catholic or Baptist or any faith or group that teaches marital fidelity. Edited June 7, 2022 by Calm 3
Chum Posted June 7, 2022 Posted June 7, 2022 1 hour ago, Tacenda said: Yes, you're right, but what makes it a bigger thing is that some are LDS and that just doesn't sit well. None of it sits well at all. It's basically some members did things that (strongly) run counter to their faith. To me, that seems like every day in every ward. Bishops have to deal with gnarly stuff. If there's something novel here, I'm missing it. 1
Bernard Gui Posted June 7, 2022 Posted June 7, 2022 27 minutes ago, Chum said: The article throws that term out there as if it were established but not well known. In those cases, helpful reporting spells it out in the first paragraph. Instead, it was dangled all throughout without any explanation. At the end we get some inferences at what it could mean. Still, there ain’t no such thing. 1
Tacenda Posted June 7, 2022 Posted June 7, 2022 48 minutes ago, Chum said: It's basically some members did things that (strongly) run counter to their faith. To me, that seems like every day in every ward. Bishops have to deal with gnarly stuff. If there's something novel here, I'm missing it. Yep very true. Church is for the sinners.
Tacenda Posted June 7, 2022 Posted June 7, 2022 53 minutes ago, Calm said: I am not sure why it makes it bigger than if they were Catholic or Baptist or any faith or group that teaches marital fidelity. It's just a shock for me. It's because the articles I've read is that it's in my hometown and in my husband's hometown. But the TikTok is more blatantly out there where it was more underground.
bluebell Posted June 7, 2022 Posted June 7, 2022 3 hours ago, Tacenda said: It's apparently a thing in Utah. https://kutv.com/news/local/dangerous-liaisons-the-popular-state-of-swinging-in-utah People say it's a thing but I'm not sure how much of a thing it actually is among people who claim to be believing and active members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. The one article I read about read a lot like gossip and "I heard...." stuff. But I don't doubt that there are couples in Utah doing this stuff, and destroying their lives in the process. I just don't think that it's an epidemic among church members. 1
MustardSeed Posted June 12, 2022 Posted June 12, 2022 I’ve seen LDS swingers but not many in my therapy office. 2
Tacenda Posted June 13, 2022 Posted June 13, 2022 (edited) Mormon Land podcast has a podcast about it. Haven't listened yet though. https://www.sltrib.com/podcasts/mormonland/ Edited June 13, 2022 by Tacenda
Orthodox Christian Posted July 29, 2022 Posted July 29, 2022 On 6/7/2022 at 4:52 PM, bluebell said: Agreed. I'm not sure if they apply the label themselves or if others have labeled them as mormon, but either way, it's easy to see that these people are not mormon in beliefs or practices. Maybe they were baptized as kids or something, but the affiliation is in name only at this point. They probably applied the title to be deliberately scandalous and sensationalist. I would say that people who engage in this kind of stuff are areligious, or deeply hypocritical. 1
Recommended Posts