Jump to content
Seriously No Politics ×

LDS Church plans to decrease missions; utilize tech savviness to locate religious-minded people


Recommended Posts

Posted

Prospective missionaries will be asked 16 new questions before they are able to serve. http://www.sltrib.com/religion/local/2017/10/20/church-unveils-16-new-questions-for-prospective-mormon-missionaries-to-ensure-they-are-ready-worthy-and-able-to-serve/  https://www.lds.org/church/news/church-releases-standard-missionary-interview-questions?lang=eng&_r=1&cid=HP_FR_20-10-2017_dPFD_fCNWS_xLIDyL2_  http://www.mormonnewsroom.org/article/mormon-missionary-changes-2017  http://www.mormonnewsroom.org/multimedia/file/Standard-Interview-Questions-for-Prospective-Missionaries.pdf  

The Trib links to the actual questions. I was having trouble copying them into this so if anyone else wants to add them to the thread--I've got to run to a meeting.

"Gary Crittenden, managing director of the LDS missionary department, said the changes come after the church reviewed how to improve its missionary program.

“We really have been focused on looking at absolutely every element of missionary operations, starting from when a missionary is thinking about preparing, through the experience he has on his mission, and even after that,” he said. “And through that we’ve found opportunities where we think we can improve.”

 Topics merged.  OP that was posted first (by 2 minutes) remains.

Posted

Smac97:

My entire post is off-topic, so sue me! :o:blink:  (I will waive formal service and will accept service via a PDF copy of your complaint attached to an e-mail.  If you will not be representing yourself, tell your attorney that, since I'm poor ... notwithstanding the old adage that an attorney who represents himself has a fool for a client ... I will be representing myself, and s/he's free to contact me directly.  Now, with the legal niceties out of the way ... ;):D 

Mega--major-kudos to your son, Sir.  Notwithstanding some limitations, I served a "regular" proselyting mission.  See here (last accessed today):  https://www.lds.org/new-era/1993/02/we-did-it?lang=eng&_r=1.  I would not do so under today's "Raised Bar" standards.  I was, perhaps, a liability to several of my companions, in more ways than one.  In retrospect, I would have benefitted from the "outside-the-box" thinking which has occurred since my mission that has expanded the conception of what it means to be a(n effective) missionary.  On the one hand, there were (are) my limitations; on the other, I have some unique strengths, talents, and abilities which could have been employed to great(er) benefit on my mission, had that sort of "outside-the-box" thinking occurred then.

Please thank your son for his service, and remind him that, very possibly, he's reaching more people in more ways than you and I ever could have dreamed of doing as full-time missionaries, and that it's not where one serves, but how.  Whatever arrangements have been made to maximize his chances for success and to ensure that his unique challenges are met, his sacrifice is acceptable to the Lord, just as anyone else's sincere sacrifice of time, talents, and other resources is.  (In fact, given his challenges, it's very possible that the Lord has an even greater appreciation for those sacrifices than he does for the sacrifices of someone without such challenges.) :) 

Thanks,

-Ken

Posted (edited)

I wonder what the new missions are now! This mission is HUGE. There are 3 stakes and a district in it-geographically it would make sense to create a new mission here

Although it seems that this is raising the bar by actually raising the bar and not just saying it. My opinion is the last time in the early it was just a nice thing to say but nothing ever really changed.

Edited by Duncan
Posted
1 hour ago, Amulek said:

These all seem like the sort of things a bishop ought to know about a prospective missionary before recommending him/her for a mission. 

They are usually.  It is possible that a young man may move into a ward just prior to putting in his papers.  There is also value in asking the questions in an interview setting. 

Posted
Quote

We’ve leveled off to around 70,000 missionaries — still way up from the 58,000 we had,” Elder Nielson said. “In the orderly process of accommodating changes in our numbers, we’ll be slowly closing missions because we don’t need as many as we required for the great increase we experienced in 2012-13.”  

It's quite likely and possible, we'd have either rmore missionaries than we have now, without the age change, or about the same amount.  Consider:

Year             M Count            % Change from Prev

2010            52,225                 .95%

2011            55,410                6.1%

2012            58,990                 6.5%

2013           83,035                 40.8%

2014          85,147                  2.5%

2015          74,079                -13%

2016           70,946                -4.23

 

Estimation if no age change

2010            52,225                 .95%

2011            55,410                6.1%

2012            58,990                 6.5%

2013            60,769                3%

2014            63,278                4.1%

2015            66,396                4.9%

2016             69,472              4.2%

 

It could be that the count grew by 6 percent or more too.  Meaning in 2016 we could have ended with 75,000 missionaries.  Maybe the "revelation" of the age change produced an overall negative? 

Posted

The difference is in the explicitness about the various disabilities.   Lots of missionaries want to pretend they can read when they cannot, or can stay on task, when they struggle ---- sometimes even with medication.   Some of the accommodations should be considerably easier with everyone having a smartphone (ability to change the font or background of what you are reading, have the device change text to speech, which improves comprehension for lots of those with reading disabilities.   But if the kiddo is too out of shape to walk for long periods of time, or any other condition that may not surface unless directly asked (and for missionaries whose parents have largely advocated for them , may not even know the full nature of the diagnoses), explicit questions that their parents also know about will help avoid setting prospective missionaries up for failure, AND allow the church to send missionaries to where their services will be useful.

Posted

I think young men are struggling with this stuff.  The number of sisters, we are told, doubled.  Which also suggests there are less young men going then used to.  If the Church had revelation to change the age for women and left the men, it is also likely that the number of young men going would have continued to increase, and the number of young women would have increased very quickly, as it did.  We might have leveled off at a number, right now, that is over 80,000, if they did that.  I think part of the problem with the steep decrease was the unanticipated problems caused by the age change--younger fellows means many who went weren't ready (hopefully a trend that somehow stops or levels off). 

Posted

I'm glad to see the Church finally embracing smart phones. I have definitely noticed a societal shift to their use, and it is not a good business plan to fail to market to smart phone users - speaking from experience. Phone books are literally dinosaurs and to reach customers one literally must reach smart phones. With the advent of social media, this is definitely the wave of the future - at least in the United States. 

As for the interview questions, I'm wondering if it wouldn't be good to end with an additional question about aspirations or skills of the candidate. In other words maybe something like "Do you feel you have any skills you feel could be put to a particular use in a mission?" 

Rather than ending on questions about limits/limitations, this would end the interview on a note of hopes and aspirations of candidates, and may prove useful in steering particular candidates into areas where they would be most effective. If asked the right way it shouldn't make a candidate feel inadequate in any way, and could open new doors.

Posted
34 minutes ago, stemelbow said:

It's quite likely and possible, we'd have either rmore missionaries than we have now, without the age change, or about the same amount.  Consider:

Year             M Count            % Change from Prev

2010            52,225                 .95%

2011            55,410                6.1%

2012            58,990                 6.5%

2013           83,035                 40.8%

2014          85,147                  2.5%

2015          74,079                -13%

2016           70,946                -4.23

 

Estimation if no age change

2010            52,225                 .95%

2011            55,410                6.1%

2012            58,990                 6.5%

2013            60,769                3%

2014            63,278                4.1%

2015            66,396                4.9%

2016             69,472              4.2%

 

It could be that the count grew by 6 percent or more too.  Meaning in 2016 we could have ended with 75,000 missionaries.  Maybe the "revelation" of the age change produced an overall negative? 

Tough to say. I think the biggest effect of the age change is way more sisters serving.

Posted
22 minutes ago, Gray said:

Tough to say. I think the biggest effect of the age change is way more sisters serving.

I agree. The younger age may have resulted in more young men going than previously, but the significant change has been among young women, at least from what I have seen.

Posted

This will surely beat the 60's telephone book calls...my cousin did this in California..grab a phone book and make calls..it was disheartening.

Posted
1 minute ago, Jeanne said:

This will surely beat the 60's telephone book calls...my cousin did this in California..grab a phone book and make calls..it was disheartening.

I have a funny story about that but it's kinda inappropriate for here...........

Posted
10 minutes ago, jkwilliams said:

I agree. The younger age may have resulted in more young men going than previously, but the significant change has been among young women, at least from what I have seen.

Well the other byproduct is a significant change in young men going.  It's less than it used to be.  Also, as tough as it is, the conversion rate and the number of conversions has gone down too, since the age change (as has growth rate, overall, and the rate of children of record).

 

 

Posted
Just now, stemelbow said:

Well the other byproduct is a significant change in young men going.  It's less than it used to be.  Also, as tough as it is, the conversion rate and the number of conversions has gone down too, since the age change (as has growth rate, overall, and the rate of children of record).

I haven't seen any evidence that fewer young men are going, but then I haven't paid attention. I have heard more missionaries (men and women) are going home early.

Posted
13 minutes ago, jkwilliams said:

I haven't seen any evidence that fewer young men are going, but then I haven't paid attention. I have heard more missionaries (men and women) are going home early.

It doesn't look like I can use the search feature with my limited status, but some time ago there was a thread on this.  The analysis seemed pretty decent to me to indicate with the increase in sisters it is most likely the percent of young men serving is in decline.  

Posted
Just now, stemelbow said:

It doesn't look like I can use the search feature with my limited status, but some time ago there was a thread on this.  The analysis seemed pretty decent to me to indicate with the increase in sisters it is most likely the percent of young men serving is in decline.  

I have no reason to doubt you, but as I said, I haven't seen any evidence of this. Just was wondering if you had a citation.

Posted
7 minutes ago, jkwilliams said:

I have no reason to doubt you, but as I said, I haven't seen any evidence of this. Just was wondering if you had a citation.

Can't search, sorry. 

Posted
44 minutes ago, Duncan said:

I have a funny story about that but it's kinda inappropriate for here...........

Oh....go on...Duncan..tell us!!:)

Posted (edited)
41 minutes ago, Jeanne said:

Oh....go on...Duncan..tell us!!:)

I can't on here! hahahhaha! i'll get kicked out or something! I PM'd you!

Edited by Duncan
Posted
2 hours ago, ksfisher said:
3 hours ago, Amulek said:

These all seem like the sort of things a bishop ought to know about a prospective missionary before recommending him/her for a mission. 

They are usually.  It is possible that a young man may move into a ward just prior to putting in his papers.  There is also value in asking the questions in an interview setting. 

Oh, I agree. Sorry if there was any confusion on that. I posted that comment in the other thread before it was merged with this one.

I can see how it could be read as saying 'ought to know [without asking],' but that wasn't my intent.

I was merely pointing out that all of the questions seem like reasonable things to expect a bishop to discover the answers to before recommending someone for a mission.

Posted (edited)
17 minutes ago, Amulek said:

I was merely pointing out that all of the questions seem like reasonable things to expect a bishop to discover the answers to before recommending someone for a mission.

Yes, they are.  And I expect that most bishops, having worked with the youth in mutual and on Sunday, will already know the answers that will be given to most of the questions.  Hopefully any difficulties will already be resolved before a young man or woman goes into the interview.

Edited by ksfisher
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...