Jump to content
Seriously No Politics ×

Ordain Women still taking little bites out of the big apple


JAHS

Recommended Posts

Posted
47 minutes ago, Russell C McGregor said:

Those who actually value the Priesthood -- i.e. believing Latter-day Saints -- disagree.

 

A lot of this was just humor..lighten up Russell!:rolleyes:

Posted (edited)
5 hours ago, Calm said:

How about I try then. :)

PaPa, there are a lot of things that are uncomfortable in our ordinances (for me it is the veil over my face).  I have never heard a teaching that we should allow discomfort to get in the way of our service to God and to our fellowman as well as our own seeking out of God.

These reasons you are giving seem to me to only diminish the value of the ordinance as something that should not be wanted to be involved in simply because of minor discomfort.  There are better ways to answer the desire of women to have the Priesthood than to try and make it look like those who serve in it are having a rough time or get little out of it.

As far as calling witnesses last minute so it is no big deal, that seems to indicate a perception that women only desire to participate for the recognition and that is not what the majority of women who desire the priesthood or something like it are motivated by in my experience.  Plus just because it is a last minute consideration in many events does not mean that it should be treated that way.  Perhaps the men should be treating that part of the ordinance with more respect.

OK thanks, but I think it's not best to continue, at least for me to do so. 

Edited by Pa Pa
Posted
13 hours ago, Russell C McGregor said:

There is no substantive comment worth making for the godfather's sidekick.

 

I am interested in any substantive comment you want to contribute, Russell.

Should you ever care to make one.

 

Posted
2 hours ago, consiglieri said:

I am interested in any substantive comment you want to contribute, Russell.

Should you ever care to make one.

 

Says the guy whose comments appear to be submitted via Twitter.

You put a lot more thought and effort into your TrailerPark posts than you do here.

Posted
31 minutes ago, rongo said:

 

You put a lot more thought and effort into your TrailerPark posts than you do here.

Perhaps if the moderators here allowed me to start threads, you would observe a discernible difference.

And I find your reference to "TrailerPark" objectionable and in bad form.

Posted

Instead of whining about you being limited here, why don't you use more than 160 characters in your drive-by responses? Especially since you are asking others to be more substantive?

Objection and offense noted.

Posted
4 hours ago, consiglieri said:

Perhaps if the moderators here allowed me to start threads, you would observe a discernible difference.

And I find your reference to "TrailerPark" objectionable and in bad form.

Would you prefer "the Sty?"

 

Posted

My views are these: If the prophet Joshua could declare to the Israelites, "Behold, this stone shall be a witness unto us; for it hath heard all the words of the LORD which he spake unto us: it shall be therefore a witness unto you, lest ye deny your God," (Joshua 24:27), then women should be witnesses! 

Now who's willing to get behind me and be excommunicated, and to cut themselves off from all the blessings of the gospel to support this worthwhile organization??!

Anybody?

Anybody at all? 

Leave me a PM

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...