Jump to content
Seriously No Politics ×

Modestly Level 11


Recommended Posts

Posted

(As an aside, if I had a quarter for every time as a child / youth that a man told me to smile I’d have enough money to correct my RBF.  These days, no one ever tells me to smile.  They know better. ) 

Posted
11 minutes ago, MustardSeed said:

(As an aside, if I had a quarter for every time as a child / youth that a man told me to smile I’d have enough money to correct my RBF.  These days, no one ever tells me to smile.  They know better. ) 

I think the last one to try it on me was my grandma when when I was a freshman at BYU.  My gut reaction is to tell people you want a performing seal, go to the circus.

Posted
5 hours ago, SettingDogStar said:

Sure, but when I hug my concert after her amazing baptism and spiritual experience and then i get in trouble there is something very wrong with what we are instilling in our elders and sisters. Hugs are not “inappropriate” unless someone makes it clear they do not want one.

How do they do that? How do you know their comfort zone before you go for the full body press..

Posted (edited)
24 minutes ago, bluebell said:

I'm with you.  This is beyond frustrating!  
 

Somebody get his name! Then I’ll get a rope! 😲

Edited by Bernard Gui
Posted (edited)
23 minutes ago, MustardSeed said:

(As an aside, if I had a quarter for every time as a child / youth that a man told me to smile I’d have enough money to correct my RBF.  These days, no one ever tells me to smile.  They know better. ) 

ba9347036e0fc2d18da29e9b829be810_origina
 

If you want to see people smile do something that is worth smiling for.

Edited by The Nehor
Posted
8 minutes ago, Bernard Gui said:

Somebody get his name! Then I’ll get a rope! 😲

Well we don’t need to kill anyone. Just wish I could talk to someone who makes the decisions.  Call me Karen, I want to talk to the manager. 

 

Posted
32 minutes ago, Calm said:

It's practical, but it would make more sense imo to explain rather than just give the command.  That way it might teach a long lasting worthwhile habit rather than have someone thinking it is just an odd rule for that time or place.

I completely agree. 'Because I said so' is a perfectly good explanation when you're dealing with toddlers / very young children. Adults - not so much. 

I'm sure the mission president is doing what he thinks is best, but whenever I hear stories like these it really makes me appreciate how blessed I was to have an exceptional mission president for the majority of my mission.

 

Posted (edited)

Also could we not throw the Mission President under a bus? A rule like this probably did not pop out of nowhere. Sending missionaries home due to sin is awful and I can understand trying eccentric rules to prevent it from happening again though I do not agree with the rule itself. Basically mock the rule but let’s avoid the mind reading where all kinds of creepiness are ascribed to him.

We also do not know why. There was a groups of rules my Mission President added in our mission and some would  look chauvinist without context and the Mission President and his wife both apologized to the sisters for adding it but it was a safety issue. Thankfully it was rescinded once local conditions calmed down.

Edited by The Nehor
Posted
15 minutes ago, Bernard Gui said:

How do they do that? How do you know their comfort zone before you go for the full body press..

Ask

Posted
16 minutes ago, The Nehor said:

the Mission President and his wife both apologized to the sisters for adding it but it was a safety issue.

The explanations can go a long way to remove weirdness.  When they are lacking though, it becomes something more.

Posted
12 minutes ago, Calm said:

The explanations can go a long way to remove weirdness.  When they are lacking though, it becomes something more.

Why would we expect to be given an explanation?

Posted
11 hours ago, Calm said:

No, I don’t smile on command, but only when it comes naturally and find it weird that you are asking for it.  Especially when there is a good chance I am older than you and not some little girl who adults tell to look cute or whatever. 

My intent was to try to put a smile on your face and lighten your mood when I noticed you were not sensing my sense of humor.  And I would still enjoying "seeing" you smile more rather than having an unpleasant attitude, however old you are.

Posted

The OP said this was a modesty issue, not a safety issue. How do the sister missionaries feel about the rule? Are they too intimidated by the MP to even discuss it? Can they go above the MP if they feel he has overreached? There must be some recourse for missionaries, male or female, in such a situation. I must admit I didn’t think about these questions when my son went on a mission ten years ago, but maybe it is a conversation that needs to happen before they go. 

Posted (edited)
11 minutes ago, The Nehor said:

Why would we expect to be given an explanation?

By mission presidents for changing the standard mission rules?

Generally if you want people to change their behaviour, giving them reasons why rather than just ordering them to tends to be more effective from what I have seen.  In the case of it being safety issues, bet they got better compliance than they would have if they hadn't explained.

And if you are trying to teach a principle, explanations are often necessary.

Edited by Calm
Posted
1 hour ago, MustardSeed said:

For anyone who may be befuddled by the offense taken... I may be wrong but I Don’t believe that boys are told to smile. My opinion is that it is assumed that girls are supposed to be pleasant and pretty. Just another one of those subtle Reminders of how females are seen differently than males. I don’t like it.

For the record, I didn't tell anyone to smile. I simply said I would enjoy seeing <someone> smile more when I sensed that <someone> apparently didn't sense my sense of humor.  A light-hearted attitude can go a long way to help people get along with each other and I think it can also help people to better sense another person's sense of humor, even if the humor is not blatantly obvious.

Anyway, rather than getting upset that the sister  missionaries "have to" wear sweaters I think it would help to think of it in the sense that they "get to" wear sweaters.  And rather than thinking some older man is "making them" wear sweaters it would help to think of the "mission president" as a man acting on his sense of how good it looks (even if only to him) for young women to wear nice, cozy sweaters rather than thinking their arms are supposed to be bare naked when they are in the presence of men.

FYI: Telling women to smile is well documented enough to be called harrassment and will be treated as such on this board. Your comments about women are offensive.  

Posted
2 minutes ago, Ahab said:

For the record, I didn't tell anyone to smile

For the record:

Quote

Would you smile for me, now, please?

 

Posted
11 minutes ago, Calm said:

By mission presidents for changing the standard mission rules?

Generally if you want people to change their behaviour, giving them reasons why rather than just ordering them to tends to be more effective from what I have seen.  In the case of it being safety issues, bet they got better compliance than they would have if they hadn't explained.

And if you are trying to teach a principle, explanations are often necessary.

I agree but we are not in the mission so I would not expect to have the explanation and I got the impression that the missionary reporting this is new so she may not have heard it.

Posted
21 minutes ago, Calm said:

For the record:

 

Still not a command.  And I am still smiling.

You are restricted from posting for a week. We take this seriously on this board.

Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, The Nehor said:

I agree but we are not in the mission so I would not expect to have the explanation and I got the impression that the missionary reporting this is new so she may not have heard it.

I thought you were talking about the missionaries getting the explanation.  I agree we shouldn't expect to know.

Cinepro mention in February he had a daughter on a mission, assuming same one.

Edited by Calm
Posted
10 minutes ago, Ahab said:

For the record, I didn't tell anyone to smile. I simply said I would enjoy seeing <someone> smile more when I sensed that <someone> apparently didn't sense my sense of humor.  A light-hearted attitude can go a long way to help people get along with each other and I think it can also help people to better sense another person's sense of humor, even if the humor is not blatantly obvious.

Anyway, rather than getting upset that the sister  missionaries "have to" wear sweaters I think it would help to think of it in the sense that they "get to" wear sweaters.  And rather than thinking some older man is "making them" wear sweaters it would help to think of the "mission president" as a man acting on his sense of how good it looks (even if only to him) for young women to wear nice, cozy sweaters rather than thinking their arms are supposed to be bare naked when they are in the presence of men.

keep-calm-and-stop-being-creepy.jpg

Posted
54 minutes ago, Calm said:

Ask

“Can I give you a big hug?”

I’ve never been asked that by a serial hugger.

Usually, it’s a demand. “Come over here and let me give you a hug!”

It’s awkward to say, “No thank you. That makes me uncomfortable.”

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, MustardSeed said:

Well we don’t need to kill anyone. Just wish I could talk to someone who makes the decisions.  Call me Karen, I want to talk to the manager. 

 

Well, I’ll handle the details. After all, I am the Mormon Inquisitor.

How about the parent simply write a letter to the MP or the Church Missionary Department for clarification. Whole lotta supposin’ goin’ on.

Edited by Bernard Gui
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...