Jump to content
Seriously No Politics ×

So what's with the refugees?


Recommended Posts

Posted
Quote

The sutuation in europe is much different than in the USA where refugees can be vetted.

But they're not.  Refugees and immigrants haven't really been vetted since around 1964. Prior to that, our nation was highly selective, turning away the infected, the uneducated, those without any skills, or those with criminal backgrounds. Something that the Left won't tell you when they trot out the "nation was built on immigration" mantra.

Posted
1 hour ago, bcuzbcuz said:

I'm more than happy with our European laws....most countries, though not all, that forbid so called weapons of defense. It is illegal in Sweden to carry a knife, a stun gun, pepper spray or a gun for "defense", simply because those weapons can be used as attack weapons. Of course, of these, the most deadly, are guns.

So what is a woman supposed to do if she is attacked by a couple of guys?  Does the government think the best thing she should do is roll over and take whatever comes to her? 

Posted
2 hours ago, Calm said:

Not satire, but then not actually telling women to "use the force" either.  That is what critics of the video are comparing it to.

Over the years, I have heard a huge variety of advice from reputable sources making claims of best approaches based on studies...from being completely passive to complete resistance even in the face of guns, etc.  I cannot watch the video, so don't know where on the spectrum it actually falls.

Yes the producer does not say exactly using the "force" but if you watch the video, it might as well be.  Though the use of using the purse did actually work in this video.  I love this one

 

 

Posted
28 minutes ago, carbon dioxide said:

So what is a woman supposed to do if she is attacked by a couple of guys?  Does the government think the best thing she should do is roll over and take whatever comes to her? 

Now you're being ridiculous. A woman is not safer merely because she can be armed. It takes a special kind of psyche to, not only be armed, but to access the weapon and then use it. Studies have shown that "ordinary" people, the everyday citizen, without violent or psychotic tendencies, when stressed into a threatening situation, become almost catatonic, unable to react, even in their own defense. A woman (or man) with a gun in purse or pocket doesn't react in time.

Have you ever had to use a weapon in defense? Do you hunt? If you hunt, you know that special moment when you have to "finish off an animal". I remember looking into the eyes of a wounded moose. It was dying, that much I knew, but I had to put it out of its misery. It turned its head and looked at me. Those big, watering eyes made it very hard for me to shoot. 

I can only imagine if I had to face another human, no matter the situation of danger. I doubt I would be able to shoot. In fact, I'm sure I wouldn't be able to.

Posted
1 hour ago, BCSpace said:

But they're not.  Refugees and immigrants haven't really been vetted since around 1964. Prior to that, our nation was highly selective, turning away the infected, the uneducated, those without any skills, or those with criminal backgrounds. Something that the Left won't tell you when they trot out the "nation was built on immigration" mantra.

"Keep, ancient lands, your storied pomp!" cries she
With silent lips. "Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!"

So, you on the Right, you disagree with this bronze plaque at the base of the Statue of Liberty. You're probably correct, just surprised to hear you admit it.

Posted (edited)
20 minutes ago, bcuzbcuz said:

"Keep, ancient lands, your storied pomp!" cries she
With silent lips. "Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!"

So, you on the Right, you disagree with this bronze plaque at the base of the Statue of Liberty. You're probably correct, just surprised to hear you admit it.

All I (from the hateful Right) ask is, "And now, for the sake of these things which I have spoken unto you—that is, for the sake of retaining a remission of your sins from day to day, that ye may walk guiltless before God—I would that ye should impart of your substance to the poor, every man according to that which he hath, such as feeding the hungry, clothing the naked, visiting the sick and administering to their relief, both spiritually and temporally, according to their wants. See that all these things are done in wisdom and order; for it is not requisite that a man should run faster than he has strength. And again, it is expedient that he should be diligent, that thereby he might win the prize.”—Mosiah 4:26-27

 

....And that we and all immigrants obey the laws of our country.

Edited by Bernard Gui
Posted (edited)
20 minutes ago, bcuzbcuz said:

"Keep, ancient lands, your storied pomp!" cries she
With silent lips. "Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!"

So, you on the Right, you disagree with this bronze plaque at the base of the Statue of Liberty. You're probably correct, just surprised to hear you admit it.

I don't disagree with it and nothing I mentioned is in opposition to it. Btw, I do freely admit that the details I posted are correct.  Glad to see you admit it.

Edited by BCSpace
Addendum
Posted
10 minutes ago, JeremyOrbe-Smith said:

This current talk would be a great one even without the awesome accent. 

Amen.

Posted (edited)
18 minutes ago, JeremyOrbe-Smith said:

This current talk would be a great one even without the awesome accent. 

I enjoyed the current talk.  It outlined our personal duty and I noted the strong stressing of the fact that this was not a governmental duty nor was it suggested that anyone be forced into helping or accepting certain policies, many of which supported by those who are intolerant of my statements happen to be against the Church's stand ala the Utah Compact.

Edited by BCSpace
Correction
Posted
7 minutes ago, Mars said:

Elder Kearon's talk, tho.

hope people listen.

Thought it great that he encouraged individual action, to take initiative locally.

Posted
1 hour ago, BCSpace said:

But they're not.  Refugees and immigrants haven't really been vetted since around 1964. Prior to that, our nation was highly selective, turning away the infected, the uneducated, those without any skills, or those with criminal backgrounds. Something that the Left won't tell you when they trot out the "nation was built on immigration" mantra.

As we learned in San Bernardino though, profiling doesn't work, and who knows if vetting would have helped. The problem becomes radicalized locals.

Posted
1 minute ago, mfbukowski said:

As we learned in San Bernardino though, profiling doesn't work, and who knows if vetting would have helped. The problem becomes radicalized locals.

Non sequitur relative to what I said though.

Posted
35 minutes ago, Bernard Gui said:

All I (from the hateful Right) ask is, "And now, for the sake of these things which I have spoken unto you—that is, for the sake of retaining a remission of your sins from day to day, that ye may walk guiltless before God—I would that ye should impart of your substance to the poor, every man according to that which he hath, such as feeding the hungry, clothing the naked, visiting the sick and administering to their relief, both spiritually and temporally, according to their wants. See that all these things are done in wisdom and order; for it is not requisite that a man should run faster than he has strength. And again, it is expedient that he should be diligent, that thereby he might win the prize.”—Mosiah 4:26-27

 

....And that we and all immigrants obey the laws of our country.

Mosiah 4: 28?? .And that we and all immigrants obey the laws of our country.

Posted

ignore the above.  board software...  grumble grumble...

24 minutes ago, mfbukowski said:

Thought it great that he encouraged individual action, to take initiative locally.

i say this more as a general response than to you, particularly:

i am acutely aware of the american socio-conservative cross section of Mormons.  i have no desire to go in circles with those arguments.  suffice it to say that i remain very 'soft' on immigration.  a bit left of center.

i was glad that Elder Kearon made it a human story.  and that he encouraged us to get informed as to the goings-on in those parts of the world.  putting a human face on the problem and getting educated is the surest path to peace.  i don't want to take his remarks as any kind of tacit endorsement or thinly veiled rejection of American policy on immigration.  that's absurd on its face, anyway, as the man is British.

Posted
1 minute ago, Mars said:

  i don't want to take his remarks as any kind of tacit endorsement or thinly veiled rejection of American policy on immigration.

And iirc he asked us specifically not to.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Mars said:

and now Elder Holland gets up to speak.  what an end to this magnificent Sabbath day.

Dinosaur at conference...I am speechless.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Mars said:

and now Elder Holland gets up to speak.  what an end to this magnificent Sabbath day.

Yep.  Was that a Velociraptor he threw up there?

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...