jadams_4242 Posted September 5, 2007 Posted September 5, 2007 LikeToo much skin...tone it down guys!!!!!!!!!!!!!Pa Pa Ya know what? if i were to be picking a wife to marry, Which one do you suppose i would pick? Some bimbo in an "****" floss bikini? or the women in pa,pa,s last post?
structurecop Posted September 5, 2007 Posted September 5, 2007 Ya know what? if i were to be picking a wife to marry, Which one do you suppose i would pick? Some bimbo in an "****" floss bikini? or the women in pa,pa,s last post? Yes, disparaging women's intelligence based on how they are dressed... how very Christ-like.
Nephi Posted September 5, 2007 Posted September 5, 2007 Ya know what? if i were to be picking a wife to marry, Which one do you suppose i would pick? Some bimbo in an "****" floss bikini? or the women in pa,pa,s last post? Um... I dind't pick my wife by what she wore. For me, the first thing that I notice of a woman, before we talk, or anything of that such, is does she have an attractive face, and is it natural (ie, little to no makeup). After that, she better be smart and can identify w/me on multiple levels. Bikini or whathaveyou, eh... Who a woman is cannot be bought.
jadams_4242 Posted September 5, 2007 Posted September 5, 2007 Yes, disparaging women's intelligence based on how they are dressed... how very Christ-like. Whats the way they are dressed got to do with there intellect? because i used the word "bimbo"? {Not}
structurecop Posted September 5, 2007 Posted September 5, 2007 Whats the way they are dressed got to do with there intellect? because i used the word "bimbo"? {Not} http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/bimbobim
jadams_4242 Posted September 5, 2007 Posted September 5, 2007 http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/bimbobim
MorningStar Posted September 5, 2007 Posted September 5, 2007 "Can't Touch This" and "Hammer Time" have all new meanings after this thread. I think you should record yourself and put it on Youtube. Can you dance like MC?
jadams_4242 Posted September 5, 2007 Posted September 5, 2007 I think you should record yourself and put it on Youtube. Can you dance like MC? Well i can do that! but you probably wouldnt like what you see, from a 54 year old bald guy? {although it would have to be fun?}
Bond...James Bond Posted September 5, 2007 Posted September 5, 2007 I think you should record yourself and put it on Youtube. Can you dance like MC?I tried....but this video was mysteriously posted instead.
MorningStar Posted September 5, 2007 Posted September 5, 2007 I tried....but this video was mysteriously posted instead.I like how that guy was dressed modestly!
Bernard Gui Posted September 5, 2007 Posted September 5, 2007 True words. As a ripened man of 53 years I am astonished by the number of young girls wearing pants just a few inches from their butts. I feel like I should admonished them to pull them up. Along with the guys who wear their undies ten inches above the top part of their pants. I remember a comedian calling his son, "Droop Dog" because he wore his clothes too low. I took a lot of pictures of my son when he was a teenager because I knew someday I could blackmail him into taking good care of me in my old age. You're a man after my own heart! I made the same threat to my 16 year old "Droop Dog." WhatI REALLY wanted to do was give him a whopper wedgie.Bernard
jadams_4242 Posted September 5, 2007 Posted September 5, 2007 You're a man after my own heart! I made the same threat to my 16 year old "Droop Dog." WhatI REALLY wanted to do was give him a whopper wedgie.Bernard Well i dont like it either, but i,m thinking maybe its a little better than the skin tight bell bottom levis we wore? {i dont even want to think about it now!}
Nephi Posted September 5, 2007 Posted September 5, 2007 Are you guys suggesting that these women are guilty of making you feel the way you do (uncomfortable or whatever) because of how they are dressed?
myleague Posted September 5, 2007 Posted September 5, 2007 Are you guys suggesting that these women are guilty of making you feel the way you do (uncomfortable or whatever) because of how they are dressed?Naa... just saying that Christ fasted 40 days and 40 nights and still resisted temptation. Satan is still guilty of tempting, and Christ had the presence of mind not to drool. Instead of thinking, dang I bet that would taste really good right now, he dismissed the temptation by dismissing the tempter. If we cannot dismiss the tempter we need to dismiss ourselves. The urge is natural the lingering and dwelling isn't.
jadams_4242 Posted September 5, 2007 Posted September 5, 2007 Naa... just saying that Christ fasted 40 days and 40 nights and still resisted temptation. Satan is still guilty of tempting, and Christ had the presence of mind not to drool. Instead of thinking, dang I bet that would taste really good right now, he dismissed the temptation by dismissing the tempter. If we cannot dismiss the tempter we need to dismiss ourselves. The urge is natural the lingering and dwelling isn't. Amen!
Zakuska Posted September 5, 2007 Posted September 5, 2007 Well in this case... isnt it the temptress?
myleague Posted September 5, 2007 Posted September 5, 2007 Well in this case... isnt it the temptress? Ever since Eve... That will probably come back to bite me....
The Nehor Posted September 5, 2007 Posted September 5, 2007 Ever since Eve... That will probably come back to bite me....Eve had the advantage that there was only one man she could produce lust in and she was supposed to.
Mighty Curelom Posted September 5, 2007 Posted September 5, 2007 Naa... just saying that Christ fasted 40 days and 40 nights and still resisted temptation. Satan is still guilty of tempting, and Christ had the presence of mind not to drool.Instead of thinking, dang I bet that would taste really good right now, he dismissed the temptation by dismissing the tempter. If we cannot dismiss the tempter we need to dismiss ourselves. The urge is natural the lingering and dwelling isn't. It's interesting that you would consider a woman a bikini to be a "tempter." What, exactly, is she tempting you to do? Think naughty thoughts? I have a hard time believing men throughout the ages have been so consumed with womens' modesty if this is just about naughty thoughts. In order for a bikini clad female to be a tempter of any action worthy of the attention religions have been heaping on it, it must be a more serious sin than that. And it is. What makes an immodestly dressed female a "temptress" is the underlying assumption that the man being tempted can have her. The temptation is sex, not lust for sex. But what if the man can't "have" her? Just because a woman is wearing a bikini or low-rise jeans doesn't mean she'll sleep with you. And here we find the true root of male preoccupation with female modesty. It is precisely becausein most cases he can't have her that her immodesty is so offensive. The unacceptable emotion here is not lust; it's frustration. The Muslim insanity that requires women to be covered head-to-toe in public stems from the same psychological roots that compel Mormon men to impose standards of modesty on LDS women. It all boils down to avoiding the frustration and lack of control men feel when they see something they can't have.
helix Posted September 5, 2007 Posted September 5, 2007 It's interesting that you would consider a woman a bikini to be a "tempter." What, exactly, is she tempting you to do? Think naughty thoughts? I have a hard time believing men throughout the ages have been so consumed with womens' modesty if this is just about naughty thoughts. In order for a bikini clad female to be a tempter of any action worthy of the attention religions have been heaping on it, it must be a more serious sin than that. And it is. What makes an immodestly dressed female a "temptress" is the underlying assumption that the man being tempted can have her. The temptation is sex, not lust for sex. But what if the man can't "have" her? Just because a woman is wearing a bikini or low-rise jeans doesn't mean she'll sleep with you. And here we find the true root of male preoccupation with female modesty. It is precisely becausein most cases he can't have her that her immodesty is so offensive. The unacceptable emotion here is not lust; it's frustration. The Muslim insanity that requires women to be covered head-to-toe in public stems from the same psychological roots that compel Mormon men to impose standards of modesty on LDS women. It all boils down to avoiding the frustration and lack of control men feel when they see something they can't have.Aww....you were this close to reaching Godwin status.
Zoidberg Posted September 5, 2007 Posted September 5, 2007 Zoidberg, I agree with you in principle, but in real life it just doesn't work that way. Being human, we all have our weaknesses and limitations. To me, it doesn't seem like such a good idea to completely ignore other people's feelings and limits. I've never suggested such a thing. If someone were to come up to me and tell me, in real foul language and with an angry expression on his face, that I am a horrible, lousy, rotten person, even though my rational mind would know quite well that's not true, I have no doubt my feelings would be hurt. And just because I'm theoretically responsible for my own thoughts and should not let him hurt my feelings doesn't mean it's ok for that person to say such things to me. People are not islands, and we do affect each other.I know; which is why I think it's important to know what the person's intention are. If someone attacked you in a way you described, I can't think of many good intentions that motivated the person to do that. Besides, they would be targeting you specifically. A woman in a mini-skirt walking by is not necessarily intending to cause you, DH, to have immoral thoughts. This is the first time I haven't liked what you've had to say. Sorry? Lamanite - I appreciate your honesty. I think it shows maturity to post this and take the heat - which I perceive you have done very well. Here's my honesty, OUCH! This hurts the ego of many women. I can understand the appreciation for the twenty-something, hard-bodied woman in a bikini. I've admired it also - proabably envied it as well. When I was thirty - I had the body but no courage to wear a bikini - now I'm 40 - I have the courage but not the body (5 kids later and twins) Stretch marks on the belly of woman who had twins - Yikes! So - I guess I'm the woman that you're now repulsed by... in that 10 years of using my body (supposedly) for what it was intended for (having babies) and now it seems to some, my presence at the pool is offensive instead of "look at that beautiful woman with her beautiful children". If wearing bikinis is what you want, you should go for it. Just because the media advertises a certain "standard", it doesn't mean that's the only thing that's considered attractive by everyone. Forties is the new twenties. People who refuse to realize that other people who are past their twenties are still capable of being attractive, loving and being loved, and want to enjoy themselves as much as the younger crowd need to grow up, IMHO. Otherwise it's going to come back and bite them when they get older themselves.
Zoidberg Posted September 5, 2007 Posted September 5, 2007 It's interesting that you would consider a woman a bikini to be a "tempter." What, exactly, is she tempting you to do? Think naughty thoughts? I have a hard time believing men throughout the ages have been so consumed with womens' modesty if this is just about naughty thoughts. In order for a bikini clad female to be a tempter of any action worthy of the attention religions have been heaping on it, it must be a more serious sin than that. And it is. What makes an immodestly dressed female a "temptress" is the underlying assumption that the man being tempted can have her. The temptation is sex, not lust for sex. But what if the man can't "have" her? Just because a woman is wearing a bikini or low-rise jeans doesn't mean she'll sleep with you. And here we find the true root of male preoccupation with female modesty. It is precisely becausein most cases he can't have her that her immodesty is so offensive. The unacceptable emotion here is not lust; it's frustration. The Muslim insanity that requires women to be covered head-to-toe in public stems from the same psychological roots that compel Mormon men to impose standards of modesty on LDS women. It all boils down to avoiding the frustration and lack of control men feel when they see something they can't have.Finally, someone is being honest about why "immodest" women arouse such "righteous indignation" in certain groups of the male population. Thanks, MC.P.S.: I wonder what the underlying reasons are that cause some guys to find the sight of 12-year old girls in spaghetti straps offensive?
structurecop Posted September 5, 2007 Posted September 5, 2007 Aww....you were this close to reaching Godwin status.Not even remotely close.
Pantsman Posted September 5, 2007 Posted September 5, 2007 Nothing wrong with a pretty woman in a bikini, she has covered her private areas, plus it's hot and at a pool what is she supposed to wear? As long as you don't let your thoughts run wild with lust it's no sin to appreciate beauty when it's standing right in front of you.People need to lighten up a bit I think, a woman's body is an art form, dress modesty and not like a streetwalker but nothing wrong with looking sexy and attractive. God gave her those looks and "assets", it's no sin for her to appreciate them, or others for that matter.Like anything else self-control and moderation is critical. If the sight of a woman in a bikini causes rampant lusting and loss of self control instead of "wow she's beautiful" and look away, then you may need therapy or really work on controlling your lust.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.