Jump to content
Seriously No Politics ×

John Dehlin On The Bofm


Recommended Posts

Posted

"The Book of Mormon is fiction. There is no other plausible explanation (in my view). Joseph (along with whomever) simply made it up. We believe(d) it largely because our parents and/or social groups taught and/or pressured us to believe in it. Any time spent trying to legitimize the historicity of the Book of Mormon is a fool's errand. You may as well try to locate Narnia or Mordor. Those who insist on historicity do so (primarily) for social reasons, again in my view - even if they aren't aware of that fact. The book simply isn't credible from any perspective other than a social and/or emotional perspective....and even from those perspectives, mileage will vary."

Published today. Any comments? Not surprising in my view.

Posted (edited)

All hail John Dehlin sbowing_100-101.gif

 

I have seen the ignorance/foolishness of my ways...

 

Joseph wrote it

This I know

For John Dehlin tells me so

Edited by drums12
Posted (edited)

Im fine with the church having members included in our umbrella who think this way. Obviously there should be a limit what roles they can fulfill in the church, but given that baptism is about faith, repentance and loving christ im not sure we should limit baptism to only those who believe the BOM to be historical.

 

Edit: Perhaps this should be its own spin off thread.

Edited by Bikeemikey
Posted

"The Book of Mormon is fiction. There is no other plausible explanation (in my view). Joseph (along with whomever) simply made it up. We believe(d) it largely because our parents and/or social groups taught and/or pressured us to believe in it. Any time spent trying to legitimize the historicity of the Book of Mormon is a fool's errand. You may as well try to locate Narnia or Mordor. Those who insist on historicity do so (primarily) for social reasons, again in my view - even if they aren't aware of that fact. The book simply isn't credible from any perspective other than a social and/or emotional perspective....and even from those perspectives, mileage will vary."

Published today. Any comments? Not surprising in my view.

When you have a chance, would you mind providing a link to the quote? Thank you!

Posted (edited)

"The Book of Mormon is fiction. There is no other plausible explanation (in my view). Joseph (along with whomever) simply made it up. We believe(d) it largely because our parents and/or social groups taught and/or pressured us to believe in it. Any time spent trying to legitimize the historicity of the Book of Mormon is a fool's errand. You may as well try to locate Narnia or Mordor. Those who insist on historicity do so (primarily) for social reasons, again in my view - even if they aren't aware of that fact. The book simply isn't credible from any perspective other than a social and/or emotional perspective....and even from those perspectives, mileage will vary."

Published today. Any comments? Not surprising in my view.

so, one bears no responsibility for anything in the world. Everything is somebody else's fault. What a child. Edited by USU78
Posted

I don't have a problem with members who believe the BoM is ahistorical. It is the kind of stuff I quoted that is said about other members who hold a different POV I take issue with.

 

 

one thing I take issue is if I am supposed to report to someone who doesn't believe in the Church or just sees it as just like any other organization, just a nice thing to do and yes I have done this unfortunately!

Posted

At first, I thought it was a quote from F.A.R.M.S. ... You know the Book of Mormon isn't accurate ...loan-shifting, translations issues - because the text doesn't fit Mesoamerica... err... I meant John Dehlin's views.

Posted

one thing I take issue is if I am supposed to report to someone who doesn't believe in the Church or just sees it as just like any other organization, just a nice thing to do and yes I have done this unfortunately!

That is hard, I won't deny it. I can see pulling people from certain callings if they dont have certain beliefs, membership I see requires a few essential ones.

Not to say I don't think someone is missing out if they disbelieve certain teachings....

Posted

That is hard, I won't deny it. I can see pulling people from certain callings if they dont have certain beliefs, membership I see requires a few essential ones.

Not to say I don't think someone is missing out if they disbelieve certain teachings....

 

for sure, like for me I am supposed to report to a man on the High Council who is Catholic. he attends our Church but also attends the Catholic Church with his wife and he told the elders he likes our Church for the friends and activities and whatnot, like great and all but give me a break

Posted

You have one of the strangest stakes I've heard of. Bet you feel special. ;)

Posted

for sure, like for me I am supposed to report to a man on the High Council who is Catholic. he attends our Church but also attends the Catholic Church with his wife and he told the elders he likes our Church for the friends and activities and whatnot, like great and all but give me a break

Ecumentalism at its best. Emphasis on the 'mental' part. I would likely just go report straight to the local parish priest and skip the middle man.

Posted

There are certainly those who don`t find the BOM historical, but still find it to be the word of God. Did he qualify what he was saying? Otherwise, as happens too often, it is disappointing. For some ways of interpreting the BOM as having some possible anachronisms or Josephs input, there are some middle areas. Knowing Brother Joseph Again by Karl Sandberg, The Book of Mormon as a Modern Expansion of an Ancient Text by Blake Ostler and more recently David Bokovoy has a chapter in his Authoring the Old Testament about the BOM. They all provide for the book being inspired and the word of God. I don`t know why Grant Palmer or John Dehlin couldn`t adapt one of these theories, but maybe they just don`t believe it is the word of God.

Posted

  Any time spent trying to legitimize the historicity of the Book of Mormon is a fool's errand. You may as well try to locate Narnia or Mordor. Those who insist on historicity do so (primarily) for social reasons, again in my view - even if they aren't aware of that fact. 

 

How disappointing he once again turns to attacks and ridicule.

Posted

You have one of the strangest stakes I've heard of. Bet you feel special. ;)

 

Meh, it's Manitoba, the strangest province of Canada. It's to be expected.

Posted

You have one of the strangest stakes I've heard of. Bet you feel special. ;)

 

 

oh absolutely!hahaha! I just say I am in the Calgary east, very east stake!!

Posted

Meh, it's Manitoba, the strangest province of Canada. It's to be expected.

 

 

how are the Maple Laffs doing? hmmmm.... that's what I thought!!

Posted

oh absolutely!hahaha! I just say I am in the Calgary east, very east stake!!

Hi Duncan!

When you've got give minutes, you need to listen to the first story of the March 14 episode of NPR's This American Life. It made me chuckle.

Posted

"The Book of Mormon is fiction. There is no other plausible explanation (in my view). Joseph (along with whomever) simply made it up. We believe(d) it largely because our parents and/or social groups taught and/or pressured us to believe in it. Any time spent trying to legitimize the historicity of the Book of Mormon is a fool's errand. You may as well try to locate Narnia or Mordor. Those who insist on historicity do so (primarily) for social reasons, again in my view - even if they aren't aware of that fact. The book simply isn't credible from any perspective other than a social and/or emotional perspective....and even from those perspectives, mileage will vary."

Published today. Any comments? Not surprising in my view.

I also am curious where this was published. And how long ago this quote is from, given his changes in activity.

Posted

A year or so ago I listened to John Dehlin's podcast interview with Brant Gardner. John didn't really come off as someone who knew a whole lot about the book. Like I said, it's been awhile, but that was my impression.

Posted

I also am curious where this was published. And how long ago this quote is from, given his changes in activity.

Soooo... You missed the "published today" part?

Posted

And yet another zig to Mr. Dehlin's zags. I'm not for kicking him out of the church, but it sounds like he is leaving of his own accord. If the Book of Mormon isn't what is says it is, why not just join the Church of the NFL and give yourself a 10% raise in the process?

Posted

Hi Duncan!

When you've got give minutes, you need to listen to the first story of the March 14 episode of NPR's This American Life. It made me chuckle.

 

 

"Calgary didn't have much pride at all. The city wasn't doing great. " hahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahhahahhaha!!!! FWIW there are 3 women I would marry outta Calgary, so if one of those things happen then i'd have to visit the place

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...