Jesus Actor To Appear In The Manti Pageant For The First Time
#1
Posted 15 June 2012 - 02:48 PM
in ancient America".
Since they haven't used a Jesus actor from the time the pageant started 1967, why start now? And will the appearance
be in a vague geographical location (or like a Yucatan Peninsula setting)?
Thanks,
Jim
#2
Posted 15 June 2012 - 02:52 PM
theplains, on 15 June 2012 - 02:48 PM, said:
in ancient America".
Since they haven't used a Jesus actor from the time the pageant started 1967, why start now? And will the appearance
be in a vague geographical location (or like a Yucatan Peninsula setting)?
Thanks,
Jim
It will appear in a vague geographical setting most likely. The Church takes no official position on Book of Mormon geography.
"First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they fight you. Then you win."
—Mahatma Ghandi
#3
Posted 15 June 2012 - 03:01 PM
The last time I attended the pageant was over 10 years ago, I think. At that time, they presented the scene with the live depiction of Christ's appearance after the pageant was over. It was explained to the audience that the scene was being tried out, as it were, for addition to the pageant in future years' productions.
Again, I'm surprised to hear it has taken them this long to finally put it in.
As for why it wasn't done up to now, I can only surmise they were reticent about depicting such a sacred scene unless and until it could be done right.
Nobody gives you all the facts all at once, leastwise anti-Mormons and hostile critics. If selective focus or emphasis amounts to deceit, they are the worst of offenders.
If I detest anything as virulently as anti-Mormons obviously detest Mormonism, feel free to label me as "anti-" the thing I detest. I won't mind in the least.
An author who undertakes to criticize publicly another's religious faith and practice has the obligation, in the first instance, to understand it.
... and the anti-Mormon saith unto them: I am no anti-Mormon, for there is none — and thus he whispereth in their ears.
#4
Posted 15 June 2012 - 03:07 PM
Now, when I saw it five years ago, I seem to recall that Christ was portrayed then too. Maybe it was just a light? I don't think so though. It was a great scene.
â??Boyd K. Packer
#5
Posted 15 June 2012 - 03:09 PM
altersteve, on 15 June 2012 - 02:52 PM, said:
Which explains the wigwams and teepees at 2:20 in this video...
(Irony intended)
In spite of the world's arguments against the historicity of the Flood, and despite the supposed lack of geologic evidence, we Latter-day Saints believe that Noah was an actual man, a prophet of God, who preached repentance and raised a voice of warning, built an ark, gathered his family and a host of animals onto the ark, and floated safely away as waters covered the entire earth. We are assured that these events actually occurred by the multiple testimonies of God's prophets.
The Flood and the Tower of Babel, by Donald W. Parry, assistant professor of Hebrew at BYU, Ensign, Jan 1998, 35
#6
Posted 15 June 2012 - 03:29 PM
edit: No, actually I am positive- check out the slide show
http://www.lds.org/c...morah-pageant#d
Edited by mfbukowski, 15 June 2012 - 03:33 PM.
My Blog: Theomorphic Man http://theomorphicman.blogspot.com/
#7
Posted 15 June 2012 - 03:37 PM
mfbukowski, on 15 June 2012 - 03:29 PM, said:
I can't say why the Church has felt it could be done in New York but not in Manti. Probably has to do with individual creators in far-flung locales. I think both productions kind of emerged spontaneously as local efforts before being taken under the wing of general Church administration.
Edited by Scott Lloyd, 15 June 2012 - 04:09 PM.
Nobody gives you all the facts all at once, leastwise anti-Mormons and hostile critics. If selective focus or emphasis amounts to deceit, they are the worst of offenders.
If I detest anything as virulently as anti-Mormons obviously detest Mormonism, feel free to label me as "anti-" the thing I detest. I won't mind in the least.
An author who undertakes to criticize publicly another's religious faith and practice has the obligation, in the first instance, to understand it.
... and the anti-Mormon saith unto them: I am no anti-Mormon, for there is none — and thus he whispereth in their ears.
#8
Posted 15 June 2012 - 05:20 PM
#9
Posted 15 June 2012 - 05:31 PM
Quote
Again, I'm surprised to hear it has taken them this long to finally put it in.
Quote
This is obviously a prime example of the LDS Church covering up its history. More proof of our villainous, or at least disingenuous, ways!
Scott, I know that when you said you were surprised, you really mean that you feel you have been or are being lied to. We all feel your pain. Fortunately, there are places you can turn to for the unadultured truth, such as the RfM boards. You can come out the other side stronger!
GingerRed, I am afraid you just imagined yours. Memories like that are delusions of the religious mind.
Re-reading the article though, it is apparent the article says nothing about it being the first time. The "Article Highlight" sidebar, which may have been done by someone else, is what says it. Probably a mis-reading of the actual news release from someone who hasn't seen it.
â??Boyd K. Packer
#10
Posted 15 June 2012 - 07:26 PM
Oscar Wilde
#11
Posted 15 June 2012 - 08:47 PM
I support NCMO.
We enter this world naked, screaming, and covered in blood...the fun doesn't have to end there...
#12
Posted 16 June 2012 - 12:22 AM
I was going to say the same thing. That when i watched the Pageant some years ago I could have sworn that there was an actor for Jesus. In fact, we went as a young adult group and we stayed at the house of the aunt and uncle of a memeber in our group and their kids worked in the pageant and talked about one time the actor for Jesus was kidnapped. I think as a prank of some sort on the pageant. I don't know the details for sue but i do remember those kids having a cool iguana as a pet.
#14
Posted 16 June 2012 - 10:50 AM
Matthew J. Tandy, on 15 June 2012 - 05:31 PM, said:
Re-reading the article though, it is apparent the article says nothing about it being the first time. The "Article Highlight" sidebar, which may have been done by someone else, is what says it. Probably a mis-reading of the actual news release from someone who hasn't seen it.
Nobody gives you all the facts all at once, leastwise anti-Mormons and hostile critics. If selective focus or emphasis amounts to deceit, they are the worst of offenders.
If I detest anything as virulently as anti-Mormons obviously detest Mormonism, feel free to label me as "anti-" the thing I detest. I won't mind in the least.
An author who undertakes to criticize publicly another's religious faith and practice has the obligation, in the first instance, to understand it.
... and the anti-Mormon saith unto them: I am no anti-Mormon, for there is none — and thus he whispereth in their ears.
#15
Posted 16 June 2012 - 11:01 AM
Darren10, on 16 June 2012 - 12:22 AM, said:
Nah, I won't be there so there would be no point.
I support NCMO.
We enter this world naked, screaming, and covered in blood...the fun doesn't have to end there...
#16
Posted 16 June 2012 - 11:39 AM
The Nehor, on 15 June 2012 - 08:47 PM, said:
Don't tell anyone.
There's actually no actors in any of these
The Boss just didn't ever want to go to Manti before because....
well, you know.....
Edited by mfbukowski, 16 June 2012 - 11:42 AM.
My Blog: Theomorphic Man http://theomorphicman.blogspot.com/
#17
Posted 16 June 2012 - 08:49 PM
#18
Posted 17 June 2012 - 03:28 AM
Quote
Don't tell anyone.
There's actually no actors in any of these
The Boss just didn't ever want to go to Manti before because....
well, you know.....
#19
Posted 18 June 2012 - 11:24 AM
mfbukowski, on 16 June 2012 - 11:39 AM, said:
Don't tell anyone.
There's actually no actors in any of these
The Boss just didn't ever want to go to Manti before because....
well, you know.....
Oscar Wilde
#20
Posted 18 June 2012 - 11:31 AM
The guy he finds for Jesus has a lapsed-Mormon girlfriend who must now deal with dating "Jesus."
http://current.com/s...erican-life.htm
In spite of the world's arguments against the historicity of the Flood, and despite the supposed lack of geologic evidence, we Latter-day Saints believe that Noah was an actual man, a prophet of God, who preached repentance and raised a voice of warning, built an ark, gathered his family and a host of animals onto the ark, and floated safely away as waters covered the entire earth. We are assured that these events actually occurred by the multiple testimonies of God's prophets.
The Flood and the Tower of Babel, by Donald W. Parry, assistant professor of Hebrew at BYU, Ensign, Jan 1998, 35
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users




