Jump to content

Polygamy would reduce poverty without government assistance. Ergo, "liberals" hate polygamy.


Recommended Posts

The more bread-winners a family has, the less likely that family is to live in poverty. So, are anti-poverty activists big advocates of polygamy. Nope. Laws against "unlawful cohabitation" survive in this permissive age because, the "Left" wants poverty to persist and serve as an excuse for government intervention in the economy. 

Edited by dougtheavenger
Link to comment
  • dougtheavenger changed the title to Polygamy would reduce poverty without government assistance. Ergo, "liberals" hate polygamy.
5 hours ago, dougtheavenger said:

The more bread-winners a family has, the less likely that family is to live in poverty. So, are anti-poverty activists big advocates of polygamy. Nope. Laws against "unlawful cohabitation" survive in this permissive age because, the "Left" wants poverty to persist and serve as an excuse for government intervention in the economy. 

Really?

Link to comment

This is stupid. Fundie polygamists are infamous for extensive welfare fraud.

Does polygamy have the potential to add more breadwinners to a family? Yes, and I have seen it happen. However women make less than men so really this is more about polyandry having the potential to destroy poverty which I doubt is your primary goal.

The idea that two breadwinners can’t make enough to support a family isn’t cause for reflection that maybe the system is broken? Instead you suggest just adding more workers and probably making family units even more unstable.

Weirdo.

Link to comment
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...