juliann Posted November 15, 2015 Posted November 15, 2015 I'd love to respond to what you wrote but it's incoherent. Are you criticizing me or Julie Rowe? Try to make a concise point and I'll see if I can help you better understand.What is incoherent about noting that Rowe was involved in publicity? Conferences, book signings, advertising articles about herself are just a start. That is not a criticism of you. It is just a different opinion on what constitutes publicity. I think you will find that Calm is one of the most respected posters on the board if you take the time to get to know her a bit. 3
Popular Post bluebell Posted November 15, 2015 Popular Post Posted November 15, 2015 I'd love to respond to what you wrote but it's incoherent. Are you criticizing me or Julie Rowe? Try to make a concise point and I'll see if I can help you better understand.She did make a point and it was not incoherent. She was giving you evidence to support the idea that Julie Rowe often seeks out the limelight. 5
jaberwocky Posted November 15, 2015 Posted November 15, 2015 Fine - she seeks out the spotlight. You folks are missing 99% of the point of my post. Crikey.
bluebell Posted November 16, 2015 Posted November 16, 2015 (edited) Fine - she seeks out the spotlight. You folks are missing 99% of the point of my post. Crikey. I thought your point was that she wasn't very trustworthy and that her stories don't make sense because they reveal no radically new information but just build on what is already known. I agree. What 90% did i miss? Edited November 16, 2015 by bluebell 1
jaberwocky Posted November 16, 2015 Posted November 16, 2015 I'm new here so I guess I'll have to get used to people not reading posts thoroughly before commenting. Let me summarize - I said she doesn't seem to me to be as self-promoting as most fraudsters, so I don't place her in that category. She is highly vague on details but implies that she has a great deal of information that she has been told not to divulge. This is generally her response when asked for specifics. Her rendition of world events is almost wholly Utah-centric. The Lord seems to inform her of a lot of unnecessary information as it pertains to the end of the world.
bluebell Posted November 16, 2015 Posted November 16, 2015 I'm new here so I guess I'll have to get used to people not reading posts thoroughly before commenting. Let me summarize - I said she doesn't seem to me to be as self-promoting as most fraudsters, so I don't place her in that category. She is highly vague on details but implies that she has a great deal of information that she has been told not to divulge. This is generally her response when asked for specifics. Her rendition of world events is almost wholly Utah-centric. The Lord seems to inform her of a lot of unnecessary information as it pertains to the end of the world. I have no doubt that Cal read your entire post thoroughly and understood it (it's pretty obvious what you were trying to say and the post was well written and easy to understand, and Cal is one of the smartest of us here). It's kind of snarky to imply that someone didn't read your whole post or understand it just because they didn't want to talk about every point you made. She disagreed with one point of you post (that Rowe was not interested in self-promotio) and she provided evidence to support her disagreement. She even quoted the specific part of your post she was replying to so you would know. I think your post made sense. It covered what others have said about her and I personally didn't see any thing to respond to, though i thought your point of view was interesting and i'm glad you shared it. 2
Robert F. Smith Posted November 16, 2015 Posted November 16, 2015 (edited) ...................................................................................................... Did he announce to someone that Cecile B. DeMille was going to use no real Jewish actors in the Ten Commandments? That would have been good information to have. ............................................................................Which version of his film are you discussing here? His silent 1923 version (which used hundreds of Orthodox Jews), or the later version with Charlton Heston as Moses? The latter used Jewish actors such as Edward G. Robinson, Dorothy Neumann, and Zev Bufman, while deMille himself had a Jewish mother. Is that information important? Or just jabberwocky? Edited November 16, 2015 by Robert F. Smith 1
Jeanne Posted November 16, 2015 Posted November 16, 2015 All I know is her last book was so,o,o, boring!
Robert F. Smith Posted November 16, 2015 Posted November 16, 2015 Anyone interested in real predictions, rather than phony parlor nonsense, might want to take a listen to: Doug Fabrizio, “The Art and Science of Prediction,” Radio West (KUER), Nov 12, 2015, podcast online at http://radiowest.kuer.org/post/art-and-science-prediction .GUEST: Prof. Philip Tetlock (Univ. of Penn.), co-author, with Dan Gardner, of Superforecasting: The Art and Science of Prediction (Crown, 2015). 1
HappyJackWagon Posted November 16, 2015 Posted November 16, 2015 I'm new here so I guess I'll have to get used to people not reading posts thoroughly before commenting. Let me summarize - I said she doesn't seem to me to be as self-promoting as most fraudsters, so I don't place her in that category. She is highly vague on details but implies that she has a great deal of information that she has been told not to divulge. This is generally her response when asked for specifics. Her rendition of world events is almost wholly Utah-centric. The Lord seems to inform her of a lot of unnecessary information as it pertains to the end of the world.Yeah. She's a fake. End of story. This has been reviewed exhaustively throughout this old thread. You're not saying anything new.
Tacenda Posted November 16, 2015 Posted November 16, 2015 If anyone knows a for real one, I want to know. Would like to have a reading.
Robert F. Smith Posted November 16, 2015 Posted November 16, 2015 If anyone knows a for real one, I want to know. Would like to have a reading.Read the book in my post #234.
Tacenda Posted November 16, 2015 Posted November 16, 2015 Read the book in my post #234.Sounds good, listening to the Radio West link right now.
jaberwocky Posted November 17, 2015 Posted November 17, 2015 Yeah. She's a fake. End of story. This has been reviewed exhaustively throughout this old thread. You're not saying anything new. I have to say something new? Why weren't those rules explained to me when I signed up?
Recommended Posts