Jump to content
Seriously No Politics ×

Christ's disciples and their families.


Recommended Posts

Posted

Anyone here know of sources that speak about the families of Christ's disciples ? Any wives or children mentioned? It seems as though most were living hand to mouth as fishermen or whatever, so if they followed Jesus all over the land , what happened to their families if in fact they had any ? I wonder how old most were. Perhaps they were quite young and didn't have their own families established yet. It is possible that parents and or grandparents took up the slack. Maybe the Christian community helped out. 

As I have said before, I am re-reading the New Testament and these odd thoughts come out. 

Posted
1 hour ago, blackstrap said:

Anyone here know of sources that speak about the families of Christ's disciples ? Any wives or children mentioned? It seems as though most were living hand to mouth as fishermen or whatever, so if they followed Jesus all over the land , what happened to their families if in fact they had any ? I wonder how old most were. Perhaps they were quite young and didn't have their own families established yet. It is possible that parents and or grandparents took up the slack. Maybe the Christian community helped out. 

If they weren’t the first born son, seems like it would be less complicated.

Maybe their wives went with them.

Posted
6 minutes ago, Pyreaux said:

This explicitly states Peter had a wife, as he had a mother-in-law.

She didn’t have to be living though.

Posted (edited)
13 minutes ago, Pyreaux said:

Many themes lean on that the apostles, especially after Jesus' resurrection, choosing celibacy or continence for the ministry

Seems like that might be more distracting for some people.

Plus it often improves sleep quality.

I can see worrying if your wife might get pregnant could be problematic, but if one’s wife is past menopause.

Edited by Calm
Posted
10 hours ago, Pyreaux said:

Jude, the brother of Jesus, were brought before the Roman Emperor Domitian

Pedantic comment. Judas Thaddeus was not Jude, the brother of Jesus. The Gospels are fairly clear that Jesus' brethren did not believe on Him during His ministry and consequently would not be found among the earliest iteration of the Twelve, though James the Just joined them later. 

Speaking of James the Just, Epiphanius argues that he was a Nazarite and a lifelong celibate. This is a fourth-century writing so not contemporary, but there are no contradictory traditions.

Posted
12 hours ago, blackstrap said:

As I have said before, I am re-reading the New Testament and these odd thoughts come out. 

As far as what I have seen in the Book of Mormon, there is no specific mention of 
whether the twelve disciples chosen by Jesus in the Americas were married or had 
families. 

Did that odd thing also come to your attention?

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, telnetd said:

As far as what I have seen in the Book of Mormon, there is no specific mention of 
whether the twelve disciples chosen by Jesus in the Americas were married or had 
families. 

Did that odd thing also come to your attention?

Silence means little, as at near all levels of clergy in the New Testament automatically assumes they are married and have children to show he can manage his own household before he's put over a church:

"A bishop then must be blameless, the husband of one wife... having his children in subjection with all gravity;" (1 Timothy 3:2, 4).

"Let the deacons be the husbands of one wife, ruling their children and their own houses well." (1 Timothy 3:12).

"Don’t we have the right to be accompanied by a believing wife, as the other apostles and the Lord’s brothers and Cephas?" (1 Corinthians 9:5).

The earliest Church did not prohibit marriage for priests, bishops, or apostles.

The Church later feared land, wealth, and office would pass to clergy children, turning parishes and bishoprics into family dynasties. Enforcing celibacy ensured that all Church property stayed in the institution, not in private hands. This view is supported by many historians, including Peter Brown (in The Body and Society) and Garry Wills (in Why Priests?).

Eastern Orthodox and Eastern Catholic churches (in communion with Rome) still allow married men to be ordained as priests (though bishops are celibate).

Edited by Pyreaux
Posted
3 hours ago, telnetd said:

Did that odd thing also come to your attention?

No it didn't. In my defense , the record of the lives and travels of the BoM 12 is quite sparse compared with the record provided by both scripture and secular sources for the lives and travels of the NT 12/11/12... I will pay more attention the next time I read the BoM, thanks.

Posted
22 hours ago, Pyreaux said:

The other Apostles' Wives - 1 Corinthians 9:5:

“Have we not power to lead about a sister, a wife, as well as other apostles, and as the brethren of the Lord, and Cephas?”

Paul is defending the right of apostles (including himself) to have wives. “Cephas” = Peter; “the brethren of the Lord” = James and Jude. Indicates that most of the apostles were married, and it was normal for them to travel with their wives.

Paul’s “Yokefellow”, Philippians 4:3:

“And I intreat thee also, true yokefellow, help those women which laboured with me in the gospel…”

"Yokefellow” could be his wife as some scholars argue this based on idiomatic language.

Early Christian sources back this up (as I'm sure you know, but I'll document part of it here).

St. Ignatius of Antioch (c. 108 - 140 AD)
Epistle to Philadelphians, Chapter. 4
CHAP. IV.--HAVE BUT ONE EUCHARIST, ETC. 

"Husbands, love your wives, as fellow-servants of God, as your own body, as the partners of your life, and your co-adjutors in the procreation of children. Virgins, have Christ alone before your eyes, and His Father in your prayers, being enlightened by the Spirit. May I have pleasure in your purity, as that of Elijah, or as of Joshua the son of Nun, as of Melchizedek, or as of Elisha, as of Jeremiah, or as of John the Baptist, as of the beloved disciple, as of Timothy, as of Titus, as of Evodius, as of Clement, who departed this life in [perfect] chastity,  Not, however, that I blame the other blessed [saints] because they entered into the married state, of which I have just spoken.  For I pray that, being found worthy of God, I may be found at their feet in the kingdom, as at the feet of Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob; as of Joseph, and Isaiah, and the rest of the prophets; as of Peter, and Paul, and the rest of the apostles, that were married men. For they entered into these marriages not for the sake of appetite, but out of regard for the propagation of mankind. Fathers, 'bring up your children in the nurture and admonition of the Lord;' and teach them the holy Scriptures, and also trades, that they may not indulge in idleness. Now [the Scripture] says, 'A righteous father educates [his children] well; his heart shall rejoice in a wise son.'"

Clement of Alexandria (c. 155 - c. 220 AD)
The Stromata, or Miscellanies
Book III, Chapter VI, 52-53

"Peter and Philip had children, and Philip gave his daughters in marriage....  Even Paul did not hesitate in one letter to address his consort.  [Philippians 4:3] The only reason why he did not take her about with him was that it would have been an inconvenience for his ministry. Accordingly he says in a letter: 'Have we not a right to take about with us a wife that is a sister like the other apostles?' [1 Corinthians 9:5]  But the latter, in accordance with their particular ministry, devoted themselves to preaching without any distraction, and took their wives with them not as women with whom they had marriage relations, but as sisters, that they might be their fellow-ministers in dealing with housewives."

Posted
On 5/15/2025 at 2:58 PM, Pyreaux said:

"Let the deacons be the husbands of one wife, ruling their children and their own houses well." (1 Timothy 3:12).

Mormon males can be ordained deacons as young as 12 I think

  • 1 month later...
Posted
On 5/17/2025 at 7:06 PM, telnetd said:

Mormon males can be ordained deacons as young as 12 I think

The current policy states: "Young men join the deacons quorum beginning in January of the year they turn 12. At this time they are also eligible to be ordained deacons if they are prepared and worthy."

So a boy born on December 31 can join the deacons quorum and be ordained to that office a day after he turns 11.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...