Jump to content
Seriously No Politics ×

Will Mormon service missions become a thing of the past?


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

An interesting column by Emily Jensen about the impact of the church doing away with pure service missions.

Will Mormon service missions become a thing of the past? by Emily Jensen

I am of the opinion that all missions should be service missions and, when the opportunity arises, teach people who show interest. I suspect our retention numbers would go up if we took that approach.

 

Edited by CA Steve
Posted
4 hours ago, CA Steve said:

An interesting column by Emily Jensen about the impact of the church doing away with pure service missions.

Will Mormon service missions become a thing of the past? by Emily Jensen

I am of the opinion that all missions should be service missions and, when the opportunity arises, teach people who show interest. I suspect our retention numbers would go up if we took that approach.

 

Do we have evidence that her assumptions about the reasons for the change are accurate?  She makes a lot of points and arguments that require her assumptions about the change to be correct, but without knowing if her opinions are based on facts it’s hard for me to give the column much weight.

Is the change actually brought on by desperation to gain more converts (as she says)?  It could be.  But I know there is a bit of a stigma (largely from themselves if the few I’ve heard from are any indication) for those who serve in service missions and when I first heard about the change my first thought was that it was an effort to help those who can’t serve proselytizing missions to feel equal to those that do.

Has the church explained the reason for the change?  I haven’t read much about it. 

Posted

Australia has already been trialling the combined approach.

Young service missions are being pushed more, not less.

There is no proselytising requirement for service missionaries, and their work is customised to their abilities.

 

Posted
3 minutes ago, bluebell said:

Do we have evidence that her assumptions about the reasons for the change are accurate?  She makes a lot of points and arguments that require her assumptions about the change to be correct, but without knowing if her opinions are based on facts it’s hard for me to give the column much weight.

Is the change actually brought on by desperation to gain more converts (as she says)?  It could be.  But I know there is a bit of a stigma (largely from themselves if the few I’ve heard from are any indication) for those who serve in service missions and when I first heard about the change my first thought was that it was an effort to help those who can’t serve proselytizing missions to feel equal to those that do.

Has the church explained the reason for the change?  I haven’t read much about it. 

I don't have any more information about what she said than what is in the article, except to say the church rarely provides the type of information you are looking for and certainly would never describe a change like this as being done out of desperation.

Posted
48 minutes ago, CA Steve said:

I don't have any more information about what she said than what is in the article, except to say the church rarely provides the type of information you are looking for and certainly would never describe a change like this as being done out of desperation.

Very true.  

Posted

I think too service missionaries had their own MP couple that they reported too and so if the couple is freed up they can serve elsewhere. Some missions don't have many or any service missionaries and so why bother calling a couple to handle only a few missionaries, the Mission President can do that

Posted
30 minutes ago, Duncan said:

I think too service missionaries had their own MP couple that they reported too and so if the couple is freed up they can serve elsewhere. Some missions don't have many or any service missionaries and so why bother calling a couple to handle only a few missionaries, the Mission President can do that

An organization I am with has heavy involvement with service missionaries.  Our person who works with them said they let her know they will still have a couple over them helping them out. I think that's actually a good thing as from what I have seen the leader couples do is a lot of work.  That may be different in your area since we have a lot of members here so we have a lot of service missionaries.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...