Jump to content
Seriously No Politics ×

Hildale Floods


daz2

Recommended Posts

Posted

Has the LDS Church been involved in helping and extending relief regarding the flooding, deaths and damage in the polygamous home base city of Hildale?

Posted

Is there now a "gotcha" thing where any situation the LDS Church does not respond to in an overt fashion is an indictment of them now?

 

If there is, perhaps it's because the LDS Church pats itself on the back frequently for the help that it does offer.

 

LDS Charities Videos

 

LDS Charities Donates Medical Supplies in Papua New Guinea

 

In Post-Storm Vanuatu, Mormons Quick To Rebuild

 

There is even a pinned topic on this board to keep track of LDS charitable service.

Posted

No, I asked it to be pinned so it could give ideas to people who were looking for ways to help.

 

There were also other posters who specifically asked for links showing what the church had been doing in way of humanitarian aid.  Pinning the thread was an easier way for them to get that information.

Posted

My goodness, can you really not see the irony here?

 

People get upset when they don't think the church is doing anything, when they don't think the church is being forthright with what it's doing with humanitarian dollars, and when the church 'pat's itself on the back' by disclosing when it has gotten involved.  

 

What exactly do you want the church to do??

 

No irony. I was simply answering The Nehor's question.

Posted

For those naysayers, the church does a lot of humanitarian work that is not made public. If the FLDS needed help I'm sure there were wards and stakes in the area that offered. Many local disasters are handled by local leaders, which is what fast offerings are for. Some people will find any little thing the "church" does or doesn't do a reason to nitpick.

Posted

For those naysayers, the church does a lot of humanitarian work that is not made public. If the FLDS needed help I'm sure there were wards and stakes in the area that offered. Many local disasters are handled by local leaders, which is what fast offerings are for. Some people will find any little thing the "church" does or doesn't do a reason to nitpick.

 

Irregardless of what they know.  Don't confuse them with facts.

Posted

No irony. I was simply answering The Nehor's question.

That wasn't a simple answer. It was editorializing in way that implied the church does something wrong when it publishes its involvement in humanitarian aid.

And it was done right after you pointed out that the church had not published any involvement with helping the hildale flood victims.

Posted

That wasn't a simple answer. It was editorializing in way that implied the church does something wrong when it publishes its involvement in humanitarian aid.

And it was done right after you pointed out that the church had not published any involvement with helping the hildale flood victims.

 

If I had found an article that the Church had helped the Hildale victims I would have linked to it.

 

I guess I can only answer questions that put the LDS Church in a positive light. By the way, I recently defended the church here. You should know that since you liked my post.

Posted

If I had found an article that the Church had helped the Hildale victims I would have linked to it.

 

I guess I can only answer questions that put the LDS Church in a positive light. By the way, I recently defended the church here. You should know that since you liked my post.

 

You don't have to say things that only put the church in a positive light, but come on.  You can't suggest that the church must not have helped someone because it's not published, and then in the next breath impugn the church for publishing when they help someone.  It makes it so the church can't win.  

Posted

If there is, perhaps it's because the LDS Church pats itself on the back frequently for the help that it does offer.

 

LDS Charities Videos

 

LDS Charities Donates Medical Supplies in Papua New Guinea

 

In Post-Storm Vanuatu, Mormons Quick To Rebuild

 

There is even a pinned topic on this board to keep track of LDS charitable service.

 

You do realize that there is a difference between the Church telling its members (and anyone else interested) what it is doing and "patting itself on the back"?

 

Or has that distinction escaped you?

 

No irony. I was simply answering The Nehor's question.

 

With an answer I would expect from an infernal source with all the truthfulness that implies.

Posted

I think the church should do what it can, since they are a break off of the church, their beliefs similar to the earlier church except for the abuse. The church doesn't want much to do with them, IMO, because of anyone's misconceptions. But I think it would say a lot if they helped, maybe even convert a few of them.

Posted

You can't suggest that the church must not have helped someone because it's not published

 

I made no such suggestion. I wrote

If the LDS Church offered assistance, it wasn't reported here.

 

Logic doesn't require the converse of a conditional statement to have the same truth value as the original statement.

 

I was simply trying to help the OP find any information and showing where there wasn't any.

 

and then in the next breath impugn the church for publishing when they help someone.  It makes it so the church can't win.

 

Hardly the next breath. As I wrote before, I was responding to The Nehor's "gotcha" statement.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...