Jump to content
Seriously No Politics ×

The Red Queen Decrees The Lds Church The Kingdom Of The Antichrist


Recommended Posts

Posted

Can somebody tell me why she is called "The Red Queen"?

I still post occasionaly over there but my last infraction, where my comment that Catherine descends into "self parody" was labelled an insult, made me think my time is better spent elsewhere.

I assume red queen is taken from the character from Alice in Wonderland.

Posting at CARM is a complete and utter wadte of my time, so I'm trying to quit going there. It is hard to resist the temptation sometimes though.

Correct you are... especially since Catherine envisions her self as the White Queen.

Posted

Just wanted to share this tid bit from CARM.

Apparently Joseph Smith is the Anti-Christ and we are his minions according to the Red queen at least,

When I see such extreme fanaticism as this, I wonder about the lengths to which such people would go should Mitt Romney be elected president. I recall that in the wake of John Kerry's defeat, some of his extermist supporters were so enraged they were threatening to renounce their U.S. citizenship and move abroad. (I never heard how many actually followed through, or whether this was in every case merely empty rhetoric.)

If Romney wins the election, would we see an exodus of extreme anti-Mormons from the United States?

Posted (edited)

If Romney wins the election, would we see an exodus of extreme anti-Mormons from the United States?

One can always hope. :pardon:

Edited by Zakuska
Posted

I recall that in the wake of John Kerry's defeat, some of his extermist supporters were so enraged they were threatening to renounce their U.S. citizenship and move abroad. (I never heard how many actually followed through, or whether this was in every case merely empty rhetoric.)

I think that enragement had more to do with George W. Bush being reelected than anything else. A lot of people upset about the war in Iraq.

If Romney wins the election, would we see an exodus of extreme anti-Mormons from the United States?

I doubt it.

But we would see a lot of people (about half of the country) disapponted with the direction he wants to take the country.

Posted

I have never posted at CARM (I think I took a look-see a few years ago once). And I absolutely dislike finding these kinds of threads mocking CARM here on this board. Hmmm . . . . however . . . .

. . . . maniacal?

. . . . lol, that would be me . . . yea . . .

Posted

I have never posted at CARM (I think I took a look-see a few years ago once). And I absolutely dislike finding these kinds of threads mocking CARM here on this board. Hmmm . . . . however . . . .

. . . . maniacal?

. . . . lol, that would be me . . . yea . . .

No ones mocking. We are simply keeping people aprised of what certian others have to say.

Its like one of the quotes that used to be in mi sig line. Where some one had said that "Joseph Smith deserved to be shot."

Posted

I think that enragement had more to do with George W. Bush being reelected than anything else. A lot of people upset about the war in Iraq.

I doubt it.

But we would see a lot of people (about half of the country) disapponted with the direction he wants to take the country.

I'm referring to pure anti-Mormon bigotry, not political bent.

Posted

I am now suspended and my account is locked for subsequent unacceptable behaviors, so I am unable to communicate with them. Does anybody understand what it even means to get a ten point infraction? They apparently accumulate? How many before we are subject to being disciplined? Do you suppose this ten point infraction was taken into consideration when I was suspended later?

It means you broke a rule of some sort. If you get three infraction points in 30 days, you get a time-out.

Posted
I am not sure I have ever visited this CARM place that some of you all seem obsessed with. Before you take umbrage at my suggestion that you are obsessed, I must confess that I have an obsession of my own. The interesting thing is that the language that is used as quoted by maklelan for getting an infraction at CARM, is the exact wording as I recall getting from Catholic Answers Forum. I particularly recall, "This infraction is worth 10 point(s) and may result in restricted access until it expires. Serious infractions will never expire." Isn't that strange? It can't be coincidental.

I am now suspended and my account is locked for subsequent unacceptable behaviors, so I am unable to communicate with them. Does anybody understand what it even means to get a ten point infraction? They apparently accumulate? How many before we are subject to being disciplined? Do you suppose this ten point infraction was taken into consideration when I was suspended later?

I too have been banned from Catholic Answers as well as from CARM. The reason CA gave for banning me was "proselytizing," which seems to be a CA code word for "directly answering specific attacks against Mormonism."

So, having been banned from both places, I claim the privilege of wearing a bar over my Medal of Honor.

Regards,

Pahoran

Posted

I too have been banned from Catholic Answers as well as from CARM. The reason CA gave for banning me was "proselytizing," which seems to be a CA code word for "directly answering specific attacks against Mormonism."

So, having been banned from both places, I claim the privilege of wearing a bar over my Medal of Honor.

Regards,

Pahoran

Sir, I salute you!!!

Regards,

jo

Posted (edited)

I am not sure I have ever visited this CARM place that some of you all seem obsessed with. Before you take umbrage at my suggestion that you are obsessed, I must confess that I have an obsession of my own. The interesting thing is that the language that is used as quoted by maklelan for getting an infraction at CARM, is the exact wording as I recall getting from Catholic Answers Forum. I particularly recall, "This infraction is worth 10 point(s) and may result in restricted access until it expires. Serious infractions will never expire." Isn't that strange? It can't be coincidental.

The identical phraseology probably means that they are using the same forum software. These features are built into the software, which moderators can then use to deal with what they consider to be unacceptable behavior by forum members. "Infractions" accumulate, but the ones that expire don't. It is like the tickets you get on your drivers silence: minor, major, or serious; resulting in "demerit points". They stay on record for two years before expiring (see here for more detail). They have invented a similar procedure for dealing with unacceptable behavior on the forums. These features are built into the forum software they are using (which is different from the one they use hrere).

I am now suspended and my account is locked for subsequent unacceptable behaviors, so I am unable to communicate with them. Does anybody understand what it even means to get a ten point infraction? They apparently accumulate? How many before we are subject to being disciplined? Do you suppose this ten point infraction was taken into consideration when I was suspended later?

I am surprised. You appear to be a very well-behaved individual in this forum. Which moderator was it that suspended you? One of the things you can do at CAF is to appeal against the decision of a moderator to the forum admin, if you disagree with the decision. The moderator has to tell you what rule you broke, and where you broke it, so you can appeal against his decision. You can communicate with them by sending an email to the forum admin. Their email address is: forumadmin@catholic.com (or click "Contact Administrator" at the bottom of this page). Don't hold your breath for any fair treatment! :) But if you think you have been unfairly treated, it is worth giving it a try. They used to publish their appeals procedure on their website; but I can't see it any more. You need to give them a link to the offending post, and explain how it happened, and why you disagree.

Edited by zerinus
Posted

I am not sure I have ever visited this CARM place that some of you all seem obsessed with. Before you take umbrage at my suggestion that you are obsessed, I must confess that I have an obsession of my own. The interesting thing is that the language that is used as quoted by maklelan for getting an infraction at CARM, is the exact wording as I recall getting from Catholic Answers Forum. I particularly recall, "This infraction is worth 10 point(s) and may result in restricted access until it expires. Serious infractions will never expire." Isn't that strange? It can't be coincidental.

I am now suspended and my account is locked for subsequent unacceptable behaviors, so I am unable to communicate with them. Does anybody understand what it even means to get a ten point infraction? They apparently accumulate? How many before we are subject to being disciplined? Do you suppose this ten point infraction was taken into consideration when I was suspended later?

The Catholic site can get pretty rowdy when the anti's run loose....and they run loose quite often. I have been banned from there also for such outrageous behavior as responding to a rant with a correction. God forbid that factual data be used rather than really poor quality anti-Mormon attacks.

Posted

Just wanted to share this tid bit from CARM.

Apparently Joseph Smith is the Anti-Christ and we are his minions according to the Red queen at least,

She is a sad woman...banned for life many times, and keeps coming back. Now she is "The Kings Servant" (She was CARMella before) here. She does this while accusing us of having sock puppets there.

Posted

CARM= Christians Against Real Mormons

Its on par with all those other anti-mormons sites; blind bigotedness and closed minds.

Posted

The Catholic site can get pretty rowdy when the anti's run loose....and they run loose quite often. I have been banned from there also for such outrageous behavior as responding to a rant with a correction. God forbid that factual data be used rather than really poor quality anti-Mormon attacks.

The adversary cannot stand idly by when he feels that Truth may get the upper hand in a discussion. I have found on many sites that when an LDS, through their efforts in any particular thread, is beginning to make too much sense and the anti's are running out of ideas on how to fight the logic being presented, that the "mood" of the thread changes. Not only do the infractions and moderation prevent us from continuing, but the increase in hate is manifested through vile personal attacks, out and out lies, etc. At those times you could cut evil that eminates there with a knife; it becomes that strong.

Regards,

jo

Posted

Correct you are... especially since Catherine envisions her self as the White Queen.

The one from the movie that plays with dead things to do witchcraft and is always posing when people are looking at her and manipulates people through their love for her or the one that couldn't keep more than one thing in her head at a time if that and was totally ineffective from the book?
Posted

The one from the movie that plays with dead things to do witchcraft and is always posing when people are looking at her and manipulates people through their love for her or the one that couldn't keep more than one thing in her head at a time if that and was totally ineffective from the book?

Well... you're right. She's suposedly whiter than the White Queen, more like a pharasee who wouldn't even approach a dead body. With all her threads and obsession with necromancy.

Posted

When I see such extreme fanaticism as this, I wonder about the lengths to which such people would go should Mitt Romney be elected president. I recall that in the wake of John Kerry's defeat, some of his extermist supporters were so enraged they were threatening to renounce their U.S. citizenship and move abroad. (I never heard how many actually followed through, or whether this was in every case merely empty rhetoric.)

If Romney wins the election, would we see an exodus of extreme anti-Mormons from the United States?

Why would we wish such horror on another nation?

Personally moving them to another planet or at least the south pole.

Perhaps the Dalek homeworld?

Posted

I think that enragement had more to do with George W. Bush being reelected than anything else. A lot of people upset about the war in Iraq.

But we would see a lot of people (about half of the country) disapponted with the direction he wants to take the country.

Especially when he moves the nations Capital to SLC

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...