Dan McClellan: I am an active member of the Church

[Okrahomer]

Here

From the comments, some folks simply cannot get their minds around this.

[InCognitus]

33 minutes ago, Okrahomer said:

Here

From the comments, some folks simply cannot get their minds around this.

He also posted that on YouTube and this other one too:

Apparently he's getting a lot of questions on this lately and he's addressing them.

[JustAnAustralian]

It's interesting that one of the topics he responded to was whether was an apologist for Mormonism, when most of the questions I've seen have been whether he was doing the opposite.

Edited 5 hours ago by JustAnAustralian

[InCognitus]

1 hour ago, Okrahomer said:

some folks simply cannot get their minds around this.

I don't quite understand the problems, honestly.

This is the YouTube version in case anyone prefers that:

 

[Calm]

1 hour ago, InCognitus said:

I don't quite understand the problems, honestly.

This is the YouTube version in case anyone prefers that:

 

He has been consistently saying this for a long time and don’t see much difference from when he hung out here or other places I knew him.

[Calm]

1 hour ago, InCognitus said:

don't quite understand the problems, honestly.

I think a lot have misconceptions about what scholarship is intended to do.

Or maybe what the Church or Gospel requires?

Edited 4 hours ago by Calm

[The Nehor]

A lot of Christians think he is a an apologist for Mormons because they don’t understand what the LDS Church (and a lot of other restorationist churches) teach. If they did they would know that a lot of what Dan says is disliked and derided by people of his own church. I have seen people on the web commenting that  the LDS church is pro-LGBT because Dan is. Also people claiming that LDS people in general are very skeptical of biblical historicity to a degree I rarely see in the Church because Dan seems to be that way.

Edited 3 hours ago by The Nehor