Jump to content
Seriously No Politics ×

Quick scripture Q


Recommended Posts

Posted

Ether 12:35 "if the Gentiles have not acharity, because of our weakness, that thou wilt prove them, and btake away their ctalent, yea, even that which they have received, and give unto them who shall have more abundantly."

Am I understanding this correctly, that God will take away our talents if we do not have charity? There are a lot of comas and it is hard to see what phrases are connected and what phrases are side notes.

Posted
1 hour ago, Fether said:

Ether 12:35 "if the Gentiles have not acharity, because of our weakness, that thou wilt prove them, and btake away their ctalent, yea, even that which they have received, and give unto them who shall have more abundantly."

Am I understanding this correctly, that God will take away our talents if we do not have charity? There are a lot of comas and it is hard to see what phrases are connected and what phrases are side notes.

I read "talent" to be the same as the New Testament "talent" -- a monetary token. But, just like the New Testament, it can represent any number of gifts (including skill based talents). For example, the US is quite talented at innovation. If, as a nation, we are unable to be charitable (say to refugees, the poor, immigrants, etc.) and use our talents to bless the rest of the world, than the divine light of Christ which gives inspiration to the innovations of the world, will be diminished.

Posted
1 hour ago, Fether said:

Ether 12:35 "if the Gentiles have not acharity, because of our weakness, that thou wilt prove them, and btake away their ctalent, yea, even that which they have received, and give unto them who shall have more abundantly."

Am I understanding this correctly, that God will take away our talents if we do not have charity? There are a lot of comas and it is hard to see what phrases are connected and what phrases are side notes.

Moroni is summarizing his understanding that if the Gentiles reject the message of this book, they will lose the material and spiritual blessings they have. We often think of talents as stewardships, and there are many promises extended to the Gentiles, and prophecies about what is expected of them by way of stewardship in the latter days. Everyone can cultivate the pure love of Christ, and it entails the light of Christ and receptivity to the Gospel message. So, if we reject our stewardship, the negative consequences follow.

Posted
2 hours ago, Fether said:

Ether 12:35 "if the Gentiles have not acharity, because of our weakness, that thou wilt prove them, and btake away their ctalent, yea, even that which they have received, and give unto them who shall have more abundantly."

Am I understanding this correctly, that God will take away our talents if we do not have charity? There are a lot of comas and it is hard to see what phrases are connected and what phrases are side notes.

Linking it to Nephi seems appropriate:

https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/scriptures/bofm/2-ne/26?lang=eng

Posted
3 hours ago, CV75 said:

Moroni is summarizing his understanding that if the Gentiles reject the message of this book, they will lose the material and spiritual blessings they have.

Yeah but how about our unwillingness to get the message out there, because we might get criticism?

Posted
1 hour ago, mfbukowski said:

Yeah but how about our unwillingness to get the message out there, because we might get criticism?

Speaking as a Gentile, I still have charity toward Moroni and have accepted the gospel message. So far, so good. But not doing my part to get the message out there, or other deficits in discipleship, have their own negative consequences (for Jew and Gentile alike). These are addressed elsewhere in scripture, e.g. the parables of talents, stewards, etc. and more direct warnings in the D&C.

Posted
22 minutes ago, CV75 said:

Speaking as a Gentile, I still have charity toward Moroni and have accepted the gospel message. So far, so good. But not doing my part to get the message out there, or other deficits in discipleship, have their own negative consequences (for Jew and Gentile alike). These are addressed elsewhere in scripture, e.g. the parables of talents, stewards, etc. and more direct warnings in the D&C.

Yes, but are you speaking as a "Gentile"?

Ephraim?  Adopted in?   Very honestly I have never really gotten into all those details when I really never understood the importance of lineage- it seems a bit --- well-  discriminatory to me.   Frankly I think that if all Europeans are the descendents of Charlemagne- one person-then given 12 persons- the sons of Jacob/Israel and an additional few thousand years, it is a cinch that we are ALL literal descendents of at least one, "son of Israel" and therefore not gentiles- PLUS  then we are adopted into Ephriam as members of the church anyway-- ?-- so I think we have the "gentile" thing licked.   We jest ain't them folks.  ;) 

And then I have the side of me that thinks it's all allegorical anyway....   so ... ?   Poof!

For me the bottom line is we gotta be good missionaries, period, end of story.

Posted (edited)
58 minutes ago, mfbukowski said:

Yes, but are you speaking as a "Gentile"?

Ephraim?  Adopted in?   Very honestly I have never really gotten into all those details when I really never understood the importance of lineage- it seems a bit --- well-  discriminatory to me.   Frankly I think that if all Europeans are the descendents of Charlemagne- one person-then given 12 persons- the sons of Jacob/Israel and an additional few thousand years, it is a cinch that we are ALL literal descendents of at least one, "son of Israel" and therefore not gentiles- PLUS  then we are adopted into Ephriam as members of the church anyway-- ?-- so I think we have the "gentile" thing licked.   We jest ain't them folks.  ;) 

And then I have the side of me that thinks it's all allegorical anyway....   so ... ?   Poof!

For me the bottom line is we gotta be good missionaries, period, end of story.

Yes, I would agree that is the bottom line, but that was not Moroni's particular, immediate point, as far as I can tell, a point I find very helpful.

I take Moroni to mean that the Gentiles of the future / last days are the non-covenant people of the nations of the world (as opposed to the covenant people of the kingdom of God on earth). He feared they would reject his message. As an American, I am one those he counted as Gentiles. Fortunately, I am a covenant-keeping gentile convert into the kingdom of God on earth, making me a saint discovering the blessings of my Ephraimite lineage (which I knew or cared nothing about as a Gentile or gentile, but now appreciate as a saint); as an Ephraimite all along, I acted as a gentile and lived as a Gentile and had claim upon two sets of scriptural promises (Israel and Gentile). Today, I know that I am a saint, a Gentile and an Ephraimite (and no longer a gentile) and know these respective roles. Now if I don't carry each of them out righteously, I'm getting to your bottom line.

But all Moroni was commenting on was my role as a Gentile; elsewhere  the Lord promises us Gentiles who repent and come into the fold of Israel become saints, and claim the blessings of our tribal lineage (whether that is by blood or by adoption) as part of the organization of the kingdom of God on earth. He fretted that my nation in general would mock his words and overlook the salient message. The Lord told Him not to worry for the stated reasons and that He will judge my nation.

I suppose in recognizing our fear of mockery in sharing the message of the Restoration, we can apply the many keys shared in the rest of Ether 12, which boils down to doing our level best.

Edited by CV75
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...