Jump to content
Seriously No Politics ×

Billy Graham Faces A Backlash Over Removal Of Mormon-Cult Webpage


Avatar4321

Recommended Posts

Posted

I read this article last night, and I agreed with those who were critical of Graham. His was obviously a political move intended to benefit Romney's bid for the White House. They admitted as much. So it seems rather myopic and shallow to take what is essentially a theological position for purely political purposes.

Posted

I read this article last night, and I agreed with those who were critical of Graham. His was obviously a political move intended to benefit Romney's bid for the White House. They admitted as much. So it seems rather myopic and shallow to take what is essentially a theological position for purely political purposes.

Of course it was for political purposes. It is obvious that Mr. Romney's ideals are more in line with Mr. Graham's ideals than are Obama's. He obviously thinks preventing four more years of Obama is worth the compromise. So much so that he felt it necessary to remove that theological difference for those who wish to follow his lead. These are the kind of decisions and compromises we make on a regular basis.

Posted

Remember that Billy Graham is old and sick. This may not be his move. Out of nowhere suddenly he seems to have gotten much more political. I (and many others) believe his son is trying to. Use his legacy to build a politically influential ministry he can control. The latest actions by Billy Graham do not match what he has done in the past.

Posted

For evangelicals, berating Billy Graham is like Catholics dissing the pope. Through his globe-trotting crusades and passionate preaching, the nearly 94-year-old evangelist has converted countless Christians and almost single-handedly ushered evangelicalism into the modern age.

As Christ told us, we should leap with joy. His prophecies are continuing to be fulfilled.

Posted

Remember that Billy Graham is old and sick. This may not be his move. Out of nowhere suddenly he seems to have gotten much more political. I (and many others) believe his son is trying to. Use his legacy to build a politically influential ministry he can control. The latest actions by Billy Graham do not match what he has done in the past.

Or perhaps it is an old man realizing and rectifying mistakes of the past. Old does not equal senile.

Posted

Or perhaps it is an old man realizing and rectifying mistakes of the past. Old does not equal senile.

Doubt it as his son seems bent on political success it makes sense to hitch the cart to Romney for a bit. I suspect the same thing with Billy Graham's supposed stance on same-sex marriage laws (again Graham was against homosexuality but rarely let his comments get political). I am not basing this on a single data point.

Also, it is pretty much certain at this point he is senile. His son is calling the shots.

Posted

I read this article last night, and I agreed with those who were critical of Graham. His was obviously a political move intended to benefit Romney's bid for the White House. They admitted as much. So it seems rather myopic and shallow to take what is essentially a theological position for purely political purposes.

I have noticed how PC it has been for us to eat our own...:(
Posted

I read this article last night, and I agreed with those who were critical of Graham. His was obviously a political move intended to benefit Romney's bid for the White House. They admitted as much. So it seems rather myopic and shallow to take what is essentially a theological position for purely political purposes.

I disagree that 'cult' is a theologically determined matter. Some evangelicals try to make it one with silly definitions of the word 'cult,' but in both scholarly and popular use 'cult' is a sociological term, not a theological one.

Posted

I disagree that 'cult' is a theologically determined matter. Some evangelicals try to make it one with silly definitions of the word 'cult,' but in both scholarly and popular use 'cult' is a sociological term, not a theological one.

I agree, but I don't think Graham's ministry intends to make a scholarly statement when it designates some group as a cult. I really think they are making what they believe to a theological statement, but I could be mistaken. That being said, Graham would likely say now that the decision to remove the cult designation from The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints was more sociological than theological. I remain cynical.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...