Jump to content
Seriously No Politics ×

Focused Discussions


Nemesis

Recommended Posts

Posted

I am about to build the new forum on focused discussions for the board. In this section we plan on inviting members of the LDS community to create a topic in which they can individually control all aspects of the discussion and the rest of the board members can interact with them. This will allow the op to keep the discussion focused on the op and will allow them to delete off topic threads without getting mods involved. This could be kind of seen like a blog entry. My question is does the board prefer me to great a sub forum in general discussion or place it outside in its own folder? Give me your thoughts. Also start preparing for live chat focused discussions.

Nemesis

Posted

I am about to build the new forum on focused discussions for the board. In this section we plan on inviting members of the LDS community to create a topic in which they can individually control all aspects of the discussion and the rest of the board members can interact with them. This will allow the op to keep the discussion focused on the op and will allow them to delete off topic threads without getting mods involved. This could be kind of seen like a blog entry. My question is does the board prefer me to great a sub forum in general discussion or place it outside in its own folder? Give me your thoughts. Also start preparing for live chat focused discussions.

Nemesis

Methinks the subforum is a better choice.

Posted

I think it would be nice to have both "focused" and non-"focused" threads in the same forum. If that is possible.

Posted

I am about to build the new forum on focused discussions for the board. In this section we plan on inviting members of the LDS community to create a topic in which they can individually control all aspects of the discussion and the rest of the board members can interact with them. This will allow the op to keep the discussion focused on the op and will allow them to delete off topic threads without getting mods involved. This could be kind of seen like a blog entry. My question is does the board prefer me to great a sub forum in general discussion or place it outside in its own folder? Give me your thoughts. Also start preparing for live chat focused discussions.

Nemesis

I have no opinion on where to create the focused forum.

Will there be a record of the "live chat focused discussions"?

Posted

I think my only issue with the sub forum is that it is one more thing to click on to to get to the discussion. Is that a big deal? No not really. However having sub forums would be a nice way to organize were everything is supposed to go. Perhaps one of the subforums would be the interfaith idea you had.

I guess there would be at leats 3 sub forums under "General discussion"?

Posted

I am about to build the new forum on focused discussions for the board. In this section we plan on inviting members of the LDS community to create a topic in which they can individually control all aspects of the discussion and the rest of the board members can interact with them. This will allow the op to keep the discussion focused on the op and will allow them to delete off topic threads without getting mods involved. This could be kind of seen like a blog entry. My question is does the board prefer me to great a sub forum in general discussion or place it outside in its own folder? Give me your thoughts. Also start preparing for live chat focused discussions.

Nemesis

I dont think it matters whether it is a subforum or a seperate forum. For clarity of distinguishing it from open dialogue, it would be better as a seperate forum. This would also empahsize its unique nature compared with what is done on other discussion boards.

Larry P

Posted

While I like the Oreos with vanilla on the outside and chocolate filling, nothing beats an original Oreo with cold milk.

Posted

Already I find that switching back and forth between the existing forums is annoying.

Have a forum for the snobs and ivory tower tenured types and a forum for "common" people. All subjects acceptable in both. Allow us all to pretend to be one or the other as the mood strikes so all may post in either forum. The first forum to be heavily moderated, the second forum to be lightly moderated. There is some of each type in all of us and where one type is more dominant within, that is the forum where we will post most. Self-moderated threads in the Ivory Tower Forum.

Add to that an off topic/social forum and you've got it. No need for a "Telestial" type of forum. Go ahead and be cynically and humorously creative:

Ivory Tower Forum

Common (Vulgar) Forum

Socialite Forum

Scattered Topics Forum

Perhaps you should create an Outer Darkness Forum. Make it so that all your banned members can sign in there but are not able to start threads or make posts. Have some jokes about great gulfs affixed, cool water, and tongues etc.

Posted

I vote for separate section. Less clicks to get to, more visibility to generate more traffic (posts will be fewer because of tighter controls presumably by the OP- so we want all to see the topics easily-)

I suggest that all offering opinions on this particular thread give their reasons for their opinions so that the reasons may be clear and discussed.

Posted

Perhaps you should create an Outer Darkness Forum. Make it so that all your banned members can sign in there but are not able to start threads or make posts. Have some jokes about great gulfs affixed, cool water, and tongues etc.

Oooh, an Outer Darkness Forum... is that that were we start the topics on: "The Pope, Michael Jackson, and a Boy Scout walk into a Bar..."

(just kidding, don't ban me)

Posted
Oooh, an Outer Darkness Forum... is that that were we start the topics on: "The Pope, Michael Jackson, and a Boy Scout walk into a Bar..."

(just kidding, don't ban me)

No. Didn't you see? I said they would not be able to post or start threads. It is meant to be a cruel and humorous joke to find oneself transported there.

Posted

I vote for separate section. Less clicks to get to, more visibility to generate more traffic (posts will be fewer because of tighter controls presumably by the OP- so we want all to see the topics easily-)

I suggest that all offering opinions on this particular thread give their reasons for their opinions so that the reasons may be clear and discussed.

I second this motion.

Posted

While I like the Oreos with vanilla on the outside and chocolate filling, nothing beats an original Oreo with cold milk.

You need to take a trip to France and visit one of our bakeries. Your outlook on life will change forever!

I like the idea of focussed live chat but I'm unclear as to how this would proceed. Chats are notoriously difficult to moderate and control, simply because everyone can write at once without knowing what others are writing, and sub-discussions always end up confusing things.

Posted

Another good idea. When a banned person gives another banned person rep, it's negative rep.

That's a question I've had... if we can give rep points, why can't we give negative rep points? Call it a "dislike" button.

(not kidding this time)

ADDITION:

If you get enough rep points removed in a 24 hour period you get an automagic timeout...

Posted

I vote for separate section. Less clicks to get to, more visibility to generate more traffic (posts will be fewer because of tighter controls presumably by the OP- so we want all to see the topics easily-)

I suggest that all offering opinions on this particular thread give their reasons for their opinions so that the reasons may be clear and discussed.

Ok.

I would like to see both "focused" and non-"focused" threads in the same forum, because I like to see where the action is. If I have to bounce from forum to forum it will get frustrating for me because I am basically lazy and suffer from A.D.D. in my old age.

Posted

That's a question I've had... if we can give rep points, why can't we give negative rep points? Call it a "dislike" button.

(not kidding this time)

ADDITION:

If you get enough rep points removed in a 24 hour period you get an automagic timeout...

My personal experience is that negative points lead to problems and add no significant advantage to a board. The absence of rep points is indicative enough of whatever rep points are supposed to represent. I'm not even entirely keen on the concept of rep points, I think it makes this board even more addictive, like some sort of theological MMORPG.

Posted

Separate forum, less likely to cause confusion on what is and isn't allowed.

As to too many buttons to click....sheesh, guys, it is really all that hard? It's not like you have to get out of your seat to change the channel or anything, lol.

Posted

My personal experience is that negative points lead to problems and add no significant advantage to a board. The absence of rep points is indicative enough of whatever rep points are supposed to represent.

Good point, . . . . except,

I have accidently given a rep point to someone, with whom I vehemently disagree, when I intended to hit the "reply" button. I would like to be able to take those back. (It happened more than once.)

Posted

As to too many buttons to click....sheesh, guys, it is really all that hard? It's not like you have to get out of your seat to change the channel or anything, lol.

Hey!!!!!

What part of "LAZY" don't you understand!

:P

Posted

Good point, . . . . except,

I have accidently given a rep point to someone, with whom I vehemently disagree, when I intended to hit the "reply" button. I would like to be able to take those back. (It happened more than once.)

Well that's different :P I'm not sure if the code associates the point giver with each point. If it does, then taking back would be possible. Otherwise, it might only be possible while you are still on the page, or until you log out, provided your point-giving is recorded in the session or cookies. That's probably a feature that would need to be hard-coded though.

Posted
I'm not sure if the code associates the point giver with each point.

It must, since we can't give anyone multiple rep points.

Lehi

Posted

I am about to build the new forum on focused discussions for the board. In this section we plan on inviting members of the LDS community to create a topic in which they can individually control all aspects of the discussion and the rest of the board members can interact with them. This will allow the op to keep the discussion focused on the op and will allow them to delete off topic threads without getting mods involved. This could be kind of seen like a blog entry. My question is does the board prefer me to great a sub forum in general discussion or place it outside in its own folder? Give me your thoughts. Also start preparing for live chat focused discussions.

Nemesis

There should be a "dumpster" bin where the OP can put off-topic posts, rather than deleting them.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...