Calm

Ben, I love your posts for the most part…always feel like I am learning something that is based in solid research and experience in almost every case, but every persuasion technique analysis I have seen says making it personal in the way you did is more likely to lead that person to dig in AND possibly more important to you, lead to those who lean towards Teddy’s understanding (or even just identify more with him than you for whatever reason) to dismiss you because you paint him as extreme and they don’t see him as that extreme, if at all, so they lose trust in your ability to judge, see your agenda as driving the info, etc.. People are complex and while Teddy might come across as uncharitable in his ideas online where it’s a more abstract discussion, he could be the first one helping his neighbours move, taking ward members to doctors’ appointments, paying the largest percentage of his income to fast offerings in his ward, willing to stop on the road to help a stranger, etc.. If he is this type of person in his face to face relationship, a great example of a disciple of Christ, anyone who knows this side of him will roll their eyes and think you are the extreme one, the poor example because your comment is unreasonable to them based on their own experIence. And maybe some don’t know Teddy himself, but they know someone like Teddy and that person is very charitable in their actions (I knew someone like this and he was at every service project, volunteered for more and could always be relied upon as could his wife as well, they were neighbours around the corner; I do admit I would at times phase out when he was speaking, but he didn’t talk that much, was more a doer…but definitely felt more like he would better fit in Brigham’s time rather than Gordon’s). Judge people’s words that are written, sure….condemn the words as unkindly, wrong, etc….but given there is only so much that on screen interaction like this can actually show us of a person, it is better imo not to judge someone’s discipleship in this way, imo. I think I have in the past and nothing happened so I gave up. At this point I care much more about readers being persuaded by your ideas than I care about readers being persuaded by Teddy’s….in fact I would prefer for many of his ideas that they do not see them as appropriate interpretations.

TB mentioned this in the video that got posted not long ago, iirc. He said he gave the Church 2 years to clear his name (apparently the kids getting abused and sacrificed during those two years matter less than his reputation to him) and since Brother Anderson still has his job, TB has decided they need to be called to accountability with a lawsuit.

Can you explain how you think this could have happened with Elder Ballard going along with it? This turns Elder Ballard into part of the corruption since he had time to correct it and instead participated in destroying an allegedly good man’s reputation….apparently for political purposes. I think I asked you before and you didn’t have a chance to answer (thread was locked?). You seem to be able to assume Doug Anderson is corrupt and acted without direction from church leadership and still managed to keep his job after exposing the Church to massive liability and reputation damage if TB is accurate in his claim it was Anderson and not Elder Ballard who claimed the betrayal.

The comments were frustratingly buying it unfortunately.

https://interpreterfoundation.org/knowhy-otl04b-was-adam-meant-to-rule-over-or-rule-with-eve

This is the original source for them, I believe: https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/ensign/2007/08/crossing-thresholds-and-becoming-equal-partners?lang=eng There is just the claim, no footnote unfortunately.

Neither of them are scriptorians or Hebrew scholars. Do they mention where they learned this? https://fhssfaculty.byu.edu/directory/rick-miller https://vmrhudson.org I like Hudson’s stuff I have read, but I see this as likening the scriptures to us rather than explaining original intent. Hopefully we are ready as a culture and a people to for both the husband and the wife lead our families together. https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/ensign/2013/04/equal-partnership-in-marriage?lang=eng Their source is Brother Bruce Hafen, another good writer: He may be a Hebrew scholar amid his other efforts, but not seeing any credentials documenting that. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bruce_C._Hafen

At that time…and he may not have been familiar with other nonEnglish versions.

That’s kind of impossible not to since no language is equivalent with another (all the words having identical meaning) plus so much background context wasn’t said that one would have to know about. Think about reading a talk that referred to following the example of the Founding Fathers without knowing anything about who the Founding Fathers were or what they did. You would have to guess from what was given what their example was supposed to be. Dan McClellan recommends the NRSV for a study bible, but that may be for more academic readings. I have their cultural backgrounds study Bible and it’s packed with footnotes. But perhaps you mean changes it the least.

Of all the idiotic….. Like no one else has known about this for 30 years and investigated? Obviously the “deep church” (I would be laughing my head off if I didn’t know this could become a thing now) somehow controlled every law enforcement officer who saw this all over the internet….

Him volunteering is not him being considered by God as a candidate, just by himself.

That was my reaction to the idea. Those titles seem to place them in equal roles, but perhaps I don’t understand Catholic use here.

He was having some issues signing in. I don’t know if he gave up or not.

Looking forward to it.

Painful….

Or anyone for me. It’s a big issue and makes no sense to me. How is this a benefit to God’s (or anyone else’s) development to have to deal with corruption and overcome it again and again without the benefit of awareness of past lives rather than just progress beyond it? If it isn’t for his own benefit but the needs of others, seems like he is only only going through the motions of pretending he is tempted, etc. I am firmly behind the one and done doctrine for mortality.

Planning ahead is good so you don’t fall into a routine that wastes opportunities you now have. But be sure and ‘schedule’ free time so not every minute feels booked. I think retirement is a good time to recapture if one has lost it the sense of freedom that many of us had in childhood (and to experience it the first time if you missed out in childhood) of being able to do nothing, but wander or read or whatever the impulse strikes us without feeling guilty that some responsibility was waiting for us and we are cheating ourselves and others to have a moment of true leisure. *** This is probably a privilege of the financially stable, who have enough not to worry about where the next meal is coming from or where they will sleep that night even if they don’t have other luxuries beyond free from responsibility time.

This speaks to me deeply, more so than any other explanation.

People looking for reassurance are probably going to see such things (rightly or wrongly) as evidence of God paying attention, which can feel important after experiencing something traumatic. It may be more peace giving to believe for many God is aware of us even if he didn’t step in to save the day. It would be interesting to see if pictures are treated with any finish that doesn’t easily burn since there have been several incidents where they have pulled out pictures (it’s the scientist in me, just because something can be explained doesn’t mean it’s not a gift of peace). Just checked AI and it seems that sometimes mass produced prints are treated with a fire retardant. This may or may not be the case here. Looking at the picture, it may be covered with acrylic which can also resist burning at lower temps.

Nothing new. FBI confirming the motive… https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/nov/01/michigan-mormon-church-shooter

Jesus is quoting scripture here, which can lead to different interpretations. I like one provided by another poster awhile back: https://www.mormondialogue.org/topic/75200-mark-1534/#findComment-1210142521 Also:

Have you ever questioned or modified your insight since then? Curious about your thought process here. There are things I sense strongly as accurate so I don’t feel a need to explore or question them (until I run into new info which sometimes happens but not always), though these are personal things rather than global concepts.

Most of this is from Our World in Data Deaths due to famine suicide rates are dropping in most countries https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9476842/ living in extreme poverty Education rates: Forgot to post links while collecting these. Will put in later…

While a good point, I see the same thing as applying to his experience being able to relate to women. If he wasn’t experiencing hormonal changes, etc, physical weakness in strength to relation to men (knowledge of being able to be physically dominated by the majority of half of the human species), being physically vulnerable during pregnancy, etc…all those things unique to females even if not experienced by all females, does this mean he didn’t suffer in a meaningful way for half of the human species? Since the inability to be a male and experience many things that a female experiences in such a intrusive way that it affects general social roles is a fact, then he didn’t suffer ‘femaleness’ in the way females do…but since we (speaking for those who do) believe he did in some relevant and significant fashion, we assume that it was managed somehow. So why couldn’t he be physically perfect and still suffer in a relevant and significant way the infirmities of humankind and thus was human in all the necessary, meaningful ways rather than miss out on the experiences that make us socially human as well as biologically?