Jump to content
Seriously No Politics ×

JVW

Members
  • Posts

    730
  • Joined

  • Last visited

1 Follower

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

JVW's Achievements

Mentor

Mentor (12/14)

  • Posting Machine Rare
  • Very Popular Rare
  • Conversation Starter
  • Dedicated Rare
  • Reacting Well Rare

Recent Badges

714

Reputation

  1. On FB the pulse I got was that people didn't like him because he was a white Harvard businessman which is a perfect fit for the church's "corporation" image.
  2. Dude, shut up. You are being obstinate and disingenuous. What even is your point? Your butthurt because people did deposition stuff and records were released to discredit slanderous claims?
  3. How do you see this in light of the latest Epstein file drops? This article is a great one connecting a few dots (from some old news to the recent Epstein file drops) to pretty much every keyword @The Nehor mentioned above, all of the "debunked" stuff that falls right in line with a lot of the OP. https://substack.com/inbox/post/186994547 I'd quote the article here but half of it is screenshots. I promise you'll like reading it. @Pyreaux said, "This mirrors many such people that often use conspiracy rhetoric to deflect from their personal legal troubles by framing themselves as a martyr targeted by a corrupt establishment." Does this really happen a lot? I'm not familiar with people doing this except for maybe Trump? Have other presidents or powerful political or social figures used this tactic before? Does it stretch back throughout history, or is it a recent tactic? As far as LDS specific SRA allegations the only thing I've seen is an obscure site where a member accused President Monson of stuff. His wife wrote a blog showing her support. I don't believe his wife. I don't discount what the guy wrote, but I don't believe his accusations against Monson. I know public figures lie, but any time I watch President Monson speak he strikes me as a genuinely happy and holy man. Call me crazy. I can dig up a link if anyone is interested in reading his written testimony.
  4. I am also happy that there is a bot protector on the site. Hopefully we can start seeing new members again. I refer people I chat with to this forum from time to time and hope some of them will be interested in signing up. Every time I see a captcha I'm now reminded of this article: https://substack.com/@thedreydossier/p-184044880 I'm like Santa Claus, bringing cheer into every thread I participate in.
  5. You two remind me of the movie Grumpy Old Men, but in forum version. Your dialogue in this thread made me chuckle a few times. I bet you two would be pretty good friends if you were neighbors or something. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0107050/
  6. Oh ok, thanks Calm.
  7. That's a beautiful charity, thanks for letting me know about it!
  8. I'd like to formally request @Nemesis to lock this topic. It feels like I'm on FB right now.
  9. What ties does the DoD have with scouting? I thought at this point the scouts were basically just kind of loosely floating along in random neighborhoods. I didn't know there were any ties to the US Govt?
  10. I literally linked the most official source of information I can find. I can't help you beyond that.
  11. I'll just leave this here https://www.glamourmagazine.co.uk/article/megan-fox-digital-cover-interview-april-2022 If you want more fun articles like this just hit me up.
  12. I think it's a really sweet idea but poorly executed. Definitely has that "local" feel. It made me realize that the church should advertise donations b/c I never realized that non-members could donate before. AFAIK there isn't any other single charity program on the planet where 100% of donated funds go to charity. AFAIK Salvation Army has 18% admin costs and United Way has 15% admin cost. One thing I love about donating to the church's charity arm is that I know all money will be used for charity work and none will end up in any admin's pockets.
  13. To be fair, there are a non-trivial amount of arrests made on people who have "criminal conviction" or "pending criminal conviction". https://www.ice.gov/statistics . And the ratio of those two statuses for detentions is overwhelmingly trending towards criminals. So I'm inferring that, while the arrest rate of non-criminal illegals to criminal illegals may be 50/50, the detention rate of those arrested is like 5/95 non-criminal/criminal ratio. This data isn't up-to-date so I'm interested to see what their next quarterly update looks like as far as this is concerned.
  14. I appreciate your perspective and understand better why you framed your recent posts the way you did. Thanks for responding. ETA - I can't believe how your brain works. How can you remember and link to all of those ancient forum threads? Amazing!
  15. OK, step one assume everything I see about Epstein files is AI or doctored. Step two, dig through FB to see if I can find the stupid post. Step 3, read the comments and.. what i saw was fake. Yay! Now to tell the nobody else that I mentioned this to. Thanks for the CFR, Calm!
×
×
  • Create New...