longview

You targeted Riley by insinuating falsely that she is behaving as a "bigot" and for wanting to harm trans in any way. Not the case al all. In your three links that you posted, Riley did NOT post any pictures herself. In Media Matters, she was being interviewed and had no control over what pictures were being shown. It was the interviewer's and her staff that compiled and produce the show. As point in fact, she used the picture released by the second runner up's parents who put obscuring circles on all the heads of participants EXCEPT second runner up (their daughter). If any of them were going to be targeted, it would be the second runner up! Her parents understood that BUT the 3 of them were willing to stand for protecting female athletes and making it fair. That is definitely NOT the concern or intention of Riley. Her focus is to put pressure on administrators for their gross unfairness in forcing females to put up with the insanity of tran thugs being allowed to smash women/girls records. And even dangerously harming actual females. The radical social engineers absolutely do NOT care. They love putting on a propaganda show. AND IF people do object, they relish the opportunity to slam them for being "intolerant bigots" or transphobic. Those trannies? They exult in being vanguards of the "REVOLUTION" and love to flaunt their radicalism and "daring". All mostly social contagion.

I strongly agree with SMAC that it is social contagion. That it moves too many youngsters to foolishly glom onto the radical chic fad trend of the day.

A hate storm has deluged over Riley. But she heroically remained steadfast, courageous, and brave in fighting back against the demonic hordes. She stood with Charlie Kirk at several campus events standing for what is right, decent, fair, and faithful. She keeps going DESPITE the murderous hostility of the social engineers and radicals. She remains undaunted in carrying forth the memory of the national (and world) hero worthy of endless praises. She was labelled phobic and fascist (a tactic favored by Nehor) then subjected to actual mob punching (much to the delight of Nehor).

"Participating in drawing negative attention to specific . . ." is a VERY strange spin for you to be making in your continuing attempts to DEMONIZE Riley. I do not trust the LA Times with a ten foot pole but I did read the entire article. It is very lame and pathetic piece of propaganda trying desperately to paint Riley as a creature of the dark age. Not at all persuasive except for those who mindlessly chant one line slogans of political correctness and showing eagerness for evermore radicalism. Riley is perfectly justified in commenting on public events. That includes sport competitions and championships. She is NOT narrowly focused on trans but vigorously protesting administrations for insisting on forcing women and girls to compete with trannies and being exposed to naked males in the locker room. Females DESERVE a "league of their OWN!" All this article is doing is to quote "social justice warriors" to paint a lurid picture of the "resistence". Would Simone Biles want to be forced to compete with tranny gymnast? I really don't believe she would! Thank you for posting this link. A very excellent and fair overview of what is transpiring:

You are still slandering Riley. Do I have to demand CFR for this supposed incident?

It so VERY wrong of you and Nehor to imply that Riley Gaines would stoop to bullying or threatening trans. That is UNjustifiable character assassination typical of Nehor BUT for you to smear Riley is very disappointing.

Very troubling given any transgender kid singled out by her probably got targeted. This is NOT persecution. This is justifiable protest against the unfairness and obscenity of forcing women and girls to compete with "male" thugs and sharing the locker space.

True. But my point is that His Atonement was SO thorough that the potential was there for EVERY single person to have access IF they CHOOSE to repent. Also true of sons of perdition post-mortally. But the potential is still there IF they were to change their minds about denying the sun at noonday. Yes, the absolute sufficiency of the Atonement.

They are NOT to be compared with societies' obligation to support and sustain the "basic unit" consisting of man and woman and rearing of children in love. Other models merely need only the legal contracts for "joint" ownership of assets in the relationship. Noise about homosexual "marriages" or various avant-garde relationships do NOT merit serious treatment. I think it is a crime for government to warp the adoption process to "favor" placement in non-traditional families.

You make a good point. However, there is NO excuse for force-feeding little children hard-core and explicit pornographic books and pamphlets in school libraries and curriculum.

The Atonement is UNconditionally thorough and complete. Applicable to EVERY single person (whether spirits that remained bodiless all the way up to highest exaltation). Top to bottom and side to side and every which way. It is available to every person that entered into the Plan of Happiness in the pre-existence. But repentance is required.

Fer shure he was! If something is insanely radical, he will FIND it and exhaustively document down to the most excruciating detail and relishing the depravity of it all. ETA: Yours truly, Shirley.

AND an infinity of implementations of the Plan of Happiness. I believe that within the current Plan of Happiness, the Atonement is completely thorough. If any person will repent, they can make a FULL return to God the Father (excepting the unpardonable sin done by sons of perdition but at least all the effects of their sins will be "covered" for the sake of the victims). Mathematics teaches us that there are infinities on top of infinities. A number line has infinite positive integers going one way and infinite negative integers going the opposite direction. Then there are many kinds of infinities within infinite segments anywhere along that line. And so on . . . worlds without end . . .

Probably. There is only one who walked perfectly and atoned for those on this creation. If Christ's atonement covers his wife then it only makes sense that the Father in his mortal probation could have atoned for his future eternal companion. If the Father is OUR Elohim in our current Plan of Happiness, then Heavenly Mother is married to Him. Therefore those two were "saved" in the previous mortal probation meaning their previous Plan of Happiness. With each generation of the Gods, there is a new implementation of the Plan of Happiness.

This is just foaming-in-the-mouth bizarre. Please CFR the historical evidence.

Not only that but God graciously provides for organizing spirit planets that progress thru various stages (telestial, terrestrial, celestial).

Deflect much? What happened to Riley Gaines went beyond the pale. Those administrators officiating at the NCAA women's swimming championship were desperately trying to make it look "legitimate" in attempting to give the "glory" to "lia" Thomas (who had NO business being in the competition). "lia" and Riley were tied (amazingly!) but the officials were so determined to give the "trophy" to "lia" that they told Riley to wait for HER legitimate trophy (they will mail it to her later). Riley was a very dedicated athlete and HEROIC in every sense of the word. To add insult to injury, Riley and her legitimate team members were obscenely forced to share the locker room with "lia". Months later common sense prevailed and "lia" were stripped of HIS ill-gotten thievery and Riley obtained million dollar settlements.

And then there are political "mandates" that force women and girls to be unfairly subjected to brutality by men pretending to be "actual" females.

Nope. Whuh? You do not believe that HF went through a mortal probation? Which implies that He obtained a spirit body in the pre-existence (that was PRIOR to OUR pre-existence)? Who was His Creator? I thought you already know there are ENDLESS generations of HF presiding over successive Plan of Happiness? Our "Grandfather" God has a larger "dominion" than OUR current HF. The more generations you preside over, the more dominions become larger (numberless as the sands of the seashore).

NO. Rigid grace is inflexible and unjust. No room for the process of repentance.

I actually did read of a homosexual male married to a straight woman. Both are LDS and committed to making the "basic unit" work. Yes, just WOW! With God nothing is impossible. The transformative power of the Atonement does reach BEYOND the carnal limitations of the fallen world and lead to the joyful fulfilment of the Plan of Happiness. And its endless generations forever.

Yet you think that surgical mutilation and chemical castration of children is a SPLENDID idea? NOT a good kind of evolution for a healthy society! Just sheer random fantasies for further radicalism for the sake of more radicalism.

At the very least, he has powerful artistic expressions. He appears to have great vim and vigor. His brain may be wired differently. He has great joy in crafts and fashion projects. If he is faithful to the Law of Chastity, will he consider partnering with a "faithful" lesbian just to take on the commandment for having a biological family reared in love?

I'm sort of ambivalent about this. If Hillary Rodham Clinton could mount vigorous campaigns in black churches and the First Amendment prohibits government from stomping on free speech rights or infringing on free exercise of religion, then I am ALL for the churches to engage in political dialogue anywhere including the public square. While the LDS church wisely makes it a rule for keeping politics OUT of meeting houses, it did from time to time ask for members to participate in "crusades" for important moral causes such as stopping ERA amendment back in the 1970s and fighting the dilution of basic marriage covenant in California. Would like to better understand this. NOT a good idea. From time to time, the government will use funding sources as a weapon against certain elements of society. Hillsdale College wisely refuses any government funding and will not accept students using government scholarships or loans. Just private sources. We seriously NEED to get government OUT of the education business. If there is a need for funding, then vouchers should be given to parents strictly without strings attached or bureaucratic mandates. This can be done thru private foundations and standards bodies. All without enforcement powers.

Where Christianity is "buffet style" or the "cafeteria approach" and the restored Gospel is a "House of Order" reflecting the consistency of God.