Tacenda Posted February 24, 2025 Posted February 24, 2025 3 hours ago, Stargazer said: I can see a reason for walking it back. Inquiring minds want to know and all that, but I think that Epstein had his claws into too many people on both sides of the aisle, and that information could be generally devastating, and not just to one side alone. The one person I don't think he had his claws into was the president himself. Because if he were on the list, I don't think he would have even suggested releasing it. As you say, we'll see. He didn't suggest it, the interviewers did. 1
The Nehor Posted February 24, 2025 Posted February 24, 2025 9 hours ago, Stargazer said: I can see a reason for walking it back. Inquiring minds want to know and all that, but I think that Epstein had his claws into too many people on both sides of the aisle, and that information could be generally devastating, and not just to one side alone. The one person I don't think he had his claws into was the president himself. Because if he were on the list, I don't think he would have even suggested releasing it. As you say, we'll see. He suggests releasing all kinds of things he will never actually release. Still waiting on his promised income tax disclosures. Also his health care plan which was perpetually coming in two weeks. He says he will do all kinds of things he has no intention of ever doing. He likes to tease exciting disclosures but never shares if he thinks they could harm him. Trump teasing the release is not evidence that he thinks he would personally be safe. Also I don’t care if it is devastating. Release it you cowards. I don’t view “my side” as a group of tribal warlords I owe fealty to. If they are guilty of something punish the creepy predators. ALL OF THEM! This is actually one of the things that sometimes reassures me I am on the better side. They tend to turn on and remove their own from power if found to be perpetuating horrible crimes. Those I find to be much worse generally close ranks and ignore the crimes. And also give them cabinet positions. 1
Zosimus Posted February 26, 2025 Posted February 26, 2025 On 2/25/2025 at 5:23 AM, The Nehor said: He suggests releasing all kinds of things he will never actually release. Remember the jersey drones? POTUS: “I’m going to give you a report on drones about one day into the administration...Because I think it’s ridiculous that they are not telling you about what’s going on with the drones.” The "Report": "After research and study, the drones that were flying over New Jersey in large numbers were authorized to be flown by the FAA for research and various other reasons. Many of these drones were also hobbyists, recreational and private individuals that enjoy flying drones," So the report, which took almost a month to release, was pretty much what Biden administration had said all along. 2
Calm Posted February 28, 2025 Posted February 28, 2025 On 2/23/2025 at 8:26 PM, Tacenda said: I have a strong feeling his relationship with Epstein, or the bad parts, will never come to light unless after his presidency or death, if that's the case. So far your prediction is accurate. The big release was apparently a big bust, not much new or noteworthy if new, 3
Doctor Steuss Posted February 28, 2025 Posted February 28, 2025 3 hours ago, Calm said: So far your prediction is accurate. The big release was apparently a big bust, not much new or noteworthy if new, After seeing a video of one of the binders they "released" in this "Phase 1," I can see why they specifically chose loyal influencers rather than journalists or a standard open-access government website dump. It was almost comical watching them flip through the pages. 1
ZealouslyStriving Posted March 1, 2025 Posted March 1, 2025 5 hours ago, Calm said: So far your prediction is accurate. The big release was apparently a big bust, not much new or noteworthy if new, Listen to hour one of Glenn Beck from this morning - there is much more to the story.
The Nehor Posted March 2, 2025 Posted March 2, 2025 On 2/28/2025 at 7:50 PM, ZealouslyStriving said: Listen to hour one of Glenn Beck from this morning - there is much more to the story. And Glenn Beck is uniquely positioned to explain what that “more” is because: A. He has an inside source. B. He is an expert on FBI policy regarding sensitive documents and can explain what is going on. C. Further information was leaked to him specifically which he is passing on. D. He has a fertile imagination and is just making up what he thinks might have happened.
ZealouslyStriving Posted March 2, 2025 Posted March 2, 2025 (edited) 15 minutes ago, The Nehor said: And Glenn Beck is uniquely positioned to explain what that “more” is because: A. He has an inside source. B. He is an expert on FBI policy regarding sensitive documents and can explain what is going on. C. Further information was leaked to him specifically which he is passing on. D. He has a fertile imagination and is just making up what he thinks might have happened. Did you watch the video, which is an interview with a reporter allowed in the room? Where are the recordings which Epstein made? If you believe there is no cover-up- that the FBI already has released everything before now- well, I don't know what to tell you. Edited March 2, 2025 by ZealouslyStriving
The Nehor Posted March 2, 2025 Posted March 2, 2025 49 minutes ago, ZealouslyStriving said: Did you watch the video, which is an interview with a reporter allowed in the room? IN THE ROOM? 49 minutes ago, ZealouslyStriving said: Where are the recordings which Epstein made? No idea. Beck doesn’t know either. 49 minutes ago, ZealouslyStriving said: If you believe there is no cover-up- that the FBI already has released everything before now- well, I don't know what to tell you. I have no idea. Can’t find myself caring much. Even if we somehow uncover a list of everyone who went to the parties including signed confessions by them that they engaged in pedophilia we may not have an FBI or a DoJ with enough resources to investigate and prosecute in any case. Plus this is ridiculous theater to distract from what is going on. It is also standard Trump. Make a big announcement, release some stuff that adds nothing to anyone’s knowledge, and then claim a win. Probably also throw some shade on the FBI and fire some more random people there for not showing sufficient loyalty to the God-Emperor. Hooray. I need a drink. 1
ZealouslyStriving Posted March 2, 2025 Posted March 2, 2025 19 minutes ago, The Nehor said: IN THE ROOM? No idea. Beck doesn’t know either. I have no idea. Can’t find myself caring much. Even if we somehow uncover a list of everyone who went to the parties including signed confessions by them that they engaged in pedophilia we may not have an FBI or a DoJ with enough resources to investigate and prosecute in any case. Plus this is ridiculous theater to distract from what is going on. It is also standard Trump. Make a big announcement, release some stuff that adds nothing to anyone’s knowledge, and then claim a win. Probably also throw some shade on the FBI and fire some more random people there for not showing sufficient loyalty to the God-Emperor. Hooray. I need a drink. I'll take that as a no.
The Nehor Posted March 3, 2025 Posted March 3, 2025 (edited) 9 hours ago, ZealouslyStriving said: I'll take that as a no. If your evidence for conspiracy is that an entertainment shock said so there is nothing worth refuting. If the evidence was credible legitimate news media would be all over it. Edited March 3, 2025 by The Nehor
ZealouslyStriving Posted March 3, 2025 Posted March 3, 2025 4 hours ago, The Nehor said: If your evidence for conspiracy is that an entertainment shock said so there is nothing worth refuting. If the evidence was credible legitimate news media would be all over it. 🤣🤣🤣
The Nehor Posted March 3, 2025 Posted March 3, 2025 (edited) 16 hours ago, ZealouslyStriving said: 🤣🤣🤣 Yep, there are no reporters out there desperate to break some interesting news. This is a thing that definitely happens. Also there is a twisted irony in being cynical about the state of journalism but somehow also trusting talk radio which is like journalism only much much worse. Edited March 3, 2025 by The Nehor
ZealouslyStriving Posted March 4, 2025 Posted March 4, 2025 (edited) 2 hours ago, The Nehor said: Yep, there are no reporters out there desperate to break some interesting news. This is a thing that definitely happens. Also there is a twisted irony in being cynical about the state of journalism but somehow also trusting talk radio which is like journalism only much much worse. * Russian dossier hoax * Biden laptop Talk radio was right in those years before the (I guess we're calling it:) legacy media were forced to admit they were "wrong" (covered them up <cough>). Edited March 4, 2025 by ZealouslyStriving
The Nehor Posted March 4, 2025 Posted March 4, 2025 9 hours ago, ZealouslyStriving said: * Russian dossier hoax * Biden laptop Talk radio was right in those years before the (I guess we're calling it:) legacy media were forced to admit they were "wrong" (covered them up <cough>). Covered them up? They were both talked about ad nauseum. Talk radio didn’t have some inside track on any of them. They went with their usual political spin. If they were right it was dumb luck. They didn’t actually investigate or look into it nor are they equipped to do so. What are you even talking about?
Stargazer Posted March 4, 2025 Posted March 4, 2025 (edited) Nvrmnd Edited March 4, 2025 by Stargazer
Stargazer Posted March 4, 2025 Posted March 4, 2025 On 2/24/2025 at 10:23 PM, The Nehor said: He suggests releasing all kinds of things he will never actually release. Still waiting on his promised income tax disclosures. Also his health care plan which was perpetually coming in two weeks. He says he will do all kinds of things he has no intention of ever doing. He likes to tease exciting disclosures but never shares if he thinks they could harm him. Trump teasing the release is not evidence that he thinks he would personally be safe. Also I don’t care if it is devastating. Release it you cowards. I don’t view “my side” as a group of tribal warlords I owe fealty to. If they are guilty of something punish the creepy predators. ALL OF THEM! This is actually one of the things that sometimes reassures me I am on the better side. They tend to turn on and remove their own from power if found to be perpetuating horrible crimes. Those I find to be much worse generally close ranks and ignore the crimes. And also give them cabinet positions. I posted a somewhat detailed response to this, but after awhile decided it was pointless. So I will leave it with this: I'm on your side with regards to releasing the Epstein list. Let the chips fall where they may. And let the prosecutions proceed.
Stargazer Posted March 4, 2025 Posted March 4, 2025 On 2/24/2025 at 10:23 PM, The Nehor said: He suggests releasing all kinds of things he will never actually release. Interesting how that is playing out so far, as far as I am aware. There was an supposed initial release of the Epstein files that was trumpeted, and then it turned out to be a nothing burger, a small amount of information already available. After a whistleblower report that the actual documents were still being sequestered, Attorney General Bondi had it all investigated and it turned out there was a truckload of documents being held in the southern district of the FBI in New York, and the director of that office had been avoiding letting it go, keeping it away from release. That director has now apparently been required to resign/retire. It apparently took an entire week before this became known, and there have been some whistleblower reports that many documents may have been destroyed in the meantime. All I'm saying is that someone, and it's NOT Trump, is going to a lot of trouble to avoid that information being made public. Of course, some information still needs to be withheld -- names of victims and confidential informants, mainly. 1
Recommended Posts