Jump to content
Seriously No Politics ×

"john Dehlin Discloses His Finances, And The Church Doesn't."


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I'm fairly certain that it doesn't mean you have to post them on a website for all to view at no cost.

Good point.

Interesting, that according to Pres. Hinckley, the church's members are only to see the church's financial records, not the public. But is that even happening?

Edited by Tacenda
Posted

It's just what the Church teaches.  Some money is "tithing" money, and some money is "non-tithing" money.  Apparently, the distinction is based on how you get the money, and what you want to do with it.

 

Cine, are you trying to be obtuse?  Tithing monies are specifically given as tithing.  If I donate money for fast offerings it is not tithing; it is actually fast offerings.  If I donate funds to a perpetual fund it is not tithing; it is a donation.  Again, tithing is tithing.  Class dismissed. :acute:

Posted

The Church has been funny that way. I don't know how it pulled it all off, but it does seem odd that it comes out and says things like, "well tithing moneys weren't used..." what do they mean? You mean money donated to the Church weren't used as investments which investments helped the Church get more money and that more money was used instead of the more recent tithing donations? Without tithing given the Church wouldn't have other investments. It just seems a little too sneaky for me. Just say, tithing has funded us and we've grown into quite an org because of it with plenty of other investments that help us fund many things.

There is a difference between tithing and investments. The investments create profit which then goes into other investments both financial and social investments. Tithing goes elsewhere and not specifically toward financial investments. There is nothing sneaky about it at all. In fact, the church tells its members that tithing money was not used for such and such specific purposes but the funding came from elsewhere.

 

At times We need to stop seeing a negative everywhere we turn. Sometimes it is best to see the positive. So, investments create profit which is then invested into properties etc. It is such generating. However, lets say that there are 7 million active tithe payers throughout the world and yet, we have a church that is worth quite a lot....could tell us that the investments made have been quite successful without tithing money.

Posted

Good point.

Interesting, that according to Pres. Hinckley, the church's members are only to see the church's financial records, not the public. But is that even happening?

 

Yeah, he did indicate in that one interview that members should be able to see the church's financial records.  But, no, that has not happened.

Posted

I'm fairly certain that it doesn't mean you have to post them on a website for all to view at no cost.

 

990s for all non-profits are available online at www.guidestar.org. That's a desperate attempt to salvage him. 

Posted (edited)

Excuse me, I have to go do my taxes. I want to make sure you all of my benevolence in voluntarily paying my taxes. 

Edited by Hamilton Porter
Posted

990s for all non-profits are available online at www.guidestar.org. That's a desperate attempt to salvage him. 

 

Looks like you have to pay $125 on guidestar.org to get the most recent year.

 

Salvage him?  I have no need to "salvage him.

Posted

It's just what the Church teaches.  Some money is "tithing" money, and some money is "non-tithing" money.  Apparently, the distinction is based on how you get the money, and what you want to do with it.

And...nobody knows what goes where. 

Posted (edited)

Looks like you have to pay $125 on guidestar.org to get the most recent year.

 

Salvage him?  I have no need to "salvage him.

Except you did it on every thread were he is involved.

Edited by Mola Ram Suda Ram
Posted

Except you did it on every thread were he is involved.

 

I wasn't trying to "salvage" him.  However, since I don't believe he's quite the evil person many here make him out to be, I do feel a desire to defend him against what I view as somewhat baseless, largely emotional, attacks.

 

One irony I see in this topic in particular is that I've been told over and over that the church cannot disclose its finances because they would get picked apart by critics.  Here we have Dehlin who does disclose his finances and who is picking them apart... Church members.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...