Tacenda Posted November 19, 2013 Posted November 19, 2013 And it's helping!I don't know if you read it, but on another thread, I mentioned my neighbor has shown some signs that he might have Tourettes. And everybody loves that guy! He has a son on a mission that has shown some signs also and they love him where he's serving.My neighbor is so fun to be around, but I never want to get on his bad side, he doesn't use much tact. I'm glad you're getting some help on your thread here.Try not to think of the "E" & "G" words if possible. You seem to be a really nice person.
VideoGameJunkie Posted November 19, 2013 Author Posted November 19, 2013 I don't know if you read it, but on another thread, I mentioned my neighbor has shown some signs that he might have Tourettes. And everybody loves that guy! He has a son on a mission that has shown some signs also and they love him where he's serving.My neighbor is so fun to be around, but I never want to get on his bad side, he doesn't use much tact.I'm glad you're getting some help on your thread here.Try not to think of the "E" & "G" words if possible. You seem to be a really nice person. Haha thank you for your kind words! Ya, I was diagnosed when I was 7 and it can be rough on a person. It's like a mix of mild autism, OCD, and mild aspergers all combined. I am certain it's played a role in some bad decisions of my life, and I'm hopeful that will be taken into account during judgement. I'll try not to think about the E and G words.
VideoGameJunkie Posted November 21, 2013 Author Posted November 21, 2013 Is it possible the plural marriage thing is correct for a requirement for exaltation, and we can choose our many many different people to be sealed to in the next life? I mean, there are going to be billions of people not sealed to anyone who die. I assume there will be no jealousy in the next life.
Calm Posted November 21, 2013 Posted November 21, 2013 I think it would only be possible to be required if there were either very, very few exalted...which I don't see...or plural marriage was available to all, iow a woman had multiple husbands. Otherwise the numbers couldn't really be sustained unless the sealing pool extended to other worlds and there were worlds that didn't have almost equal male/female birth rates, but were primarily women.
Tacenda Posted November 21, 2013 Posted November 21, 2013 I think it would only be possible to be required if there were either very, very few exalted...which I don't see...or plural marriage was available to all, iow a woman had multiple husbands. Otherwise the numbers couldn't really be sustained unless the sealing pool extended to other worlds and there were worlds that didn't have almost equal male/female birth rates, but were primarily women.This concept always makes me revert to the bible's version of marriage, where Christ said that there was no marriage in heaven.
Hamba Tuhan Posted November 21, 2013 Posted November 21, 2013 This concept always makes me revert to the bible's version of marriage, where Christ said that there was no marriage in heaven. Your husband must love knowing that you're looking forward to being rid of him.
Calm Posted November 21, 2013 Posted November 21, 2013 This concept always makes me revert to the bible's version of marriage, where Christ said that there was no marriage in heaven.I have never gotten why the 'ew' factor matters to people when dealing with perfected beings...do they really imagine such perfect and balanced individuals are engaging in some sort of eternal orgy? And if not, then what is the problem?Why is no marriage somehow better than a shared marriage?
Tacenda Posted November 21, 2013 Posted November 21, 2013 Your husband must love knowing that you're looking forward to being rid of him.I have the thought that I will still be with him. But, I believe we will have a different purpose, angels, is what the bible states. But if wrong, I'm sure my husband won't be alone if there's polygamy. Carry on.
thesometimesaint Posted November 21, 2013 Posted November 21, 2013 Is it possible the plural marriage thing is correct for a requirement for exaltation, and we can choose our many many different people to be sealed to in the next life? I mean, there are going to be billions of people not sealed to anyone who die. I assume there will be no jealousy in the next life. We will ALL be Sealed to each other. There is no exaltation without it. Marriage is a different issue.
Ahab Posted November 21, 2013 Posted November 21, 2013 We will ALL be Sealed to each other. There is no exaltation without it. Marriage is a different issue.Marriage isn't what a lot of people think it is, either. Some people get too hung up on the "wedding ceremony" aspect of it.
thesometimesaint Posted November 21, 2013 Posted November 21, 2013 Marriage isn't what a lot of people think it is, either. Some people get too hung up on the "wedding ceremony" aspect of it. True.
VideoGameJunkie Posted November 22, 2013 Author Posted November 22, 2013 As long as I'm with my family and my cats for eternity, I will be super happy. 1
VideoGameJunkie Posted November 22, 2013 Author Posted November 22, 2013 But what baffles me is how I could possibly be exalted and live the life God lives and be able to create, while right now I can't even build anything out of LEGOS and have a learning disorder.
thesometimesaint Posted November 22, 2013 Posted November 22, 2013 Don't worry It's going to take my an eternity just to understand calculus.
Recommended Posts