maklelan Posted February 1, 2013 Posted February 1, 2013 (edited) CARM's new journal is entitled The Journal for Trinitarian Studies and Apologetics. The first volume is available for sale on Amazon for $6.50 (here). Here are the contents:Robert M. Bowman Jr. - Triadic New Testament Passages and the Doctrine of the Trinity Hiram R. Diaz III - The Two Natures of Christ in Genesis 3 Mike Felker - Preexistence in Mark: A Cumulative Defense Edward L. Dalcour - Jesus’ Claims to be God: Answering the Objections Scotty G. Neasbitt - God the Son in Select Theophanies of the Old Testament Michael R. Burgos Jr.(Editor) - Anthropological Monism and its Incompatibility with Biblical ChristianityI've ordered the issue and plan on reviewing it on my blog. Edited February 1, 2013 by maklelan
Calm Posted February 1, 2013 Posted February 1, 2013 If they stick with defending their own faith, it could be a good thing as it might help educate their own members.
Kenngo1969 Posted February 1, 2013 Posted February 1, 2013 If they stick with defending their own faith, it could be a good thing as it might help educate their own members.Big "if" ...
volgadon Posted February 1, 2013 Posted February 1, 2013 Big "if" ... If I were a betting man, I wouldn't mind putting a little something on Rob's article being geared towards the common objection that the credal trinity isn't found in the NT.
Kenngo1969 Posted February 1, 2013 Posted February 1, 2013 If I were a betting man, I wouldn't mind putting a little something on Rob's article being geared towards the common objection that the credal trinity isn't found in the NT.Whatever might entice you to bet on such a wildly-unlikely proposition?
volgadon Posted February 1, 2013 Posted February 1, 2013 Whatever might entice you to bet on such a wildly-unlikely proposition? Life without risks is like food without salt. 3
Bill “Papa” Lee Posted February 1, 2013 Posted February 1, 2013 CARM's new journal is entitled The Journal for Trinitarian Studies and Apologetics. The first volume is available for sale on Amazon for $6.50 (here). Here are the contents:I've ordered the issue and plan on reviewing it on my blog. I have not been there since breaking my back...could not heal and fight at the same time.
Calm Posted February 1, 2013 Posted February 1, 2013 Life without risks is like food without salt.But do you put it (salt, not life or Bowman's comments) on watermelon or in your lemonade?
volgadon Posted February 1, 2013 Posted February 1, 2013 I have not been there since breaking my back...could not heal and fight at the same time. Don't go back, it is a cesspit. 1
volgadon Posted February 1, 2013 Posted February 1, 2013 But do you put it (salt, not life or Bowman's comments) on watermelon or in your lemonade?No, but pickled lemons, yummy.
Libs Posted February 1, 2013 Posted February 1, 2013 If any of this money goes to support CARM or Matt Slick, I would not want to contribute. 2
Damien the Leper Posted February 1, 2013 Posted February 1, 2013 CARM's new journal is entitled The Journal for Trinitarian Studies and Apologetics. The first volume is available for sale on Amazon for $6.50 (here). Here are the contents:I've ordered the issue and plan on reviewing it on my blog. I think I'll wait for your review before I consider reading it.
go_utes01 Posted February 1, 2013 Posted February 1, 2013 Don't go back, it is a cesspit.I hadn't had the good (bad) fortune of visiting Carm until recently - and the folks on their Mormonism page were like the Stephen Colberts of the anti-Mormon evangelical crowd. At first I could not believe they were serious, but either way, their way-over-the-top ridiculousness is good for a chuckle (in small doses).
Vance Posted February 1, 2013 Posted February 1, 2013 If I were a betting man, I wouldn't mind putting a little something on Rob's article being geared towards the common objection that the credal trinity isn't found in the NT.Bowman's, most likely, is a rehash of the piece he has on his website. It is very sloppy "sholarship" to be sure. He starts with the conclusion, then works backwards (his standard method of operation).
Vance Posted February 1, 2013 Posted February 1, 2013 If any of this money goes to support CARM or Matt Slick, I would not want to contribute.I would rather pay to get Mak's review. 2
Mola Ram Suda Ram Posted February 1, 2013 Posted February 1, 2013 If any of this money goes to support CARM or Matt Slick, I would not want to contribute.I concour. I think it is good that Mak is doing a review though. That will be quite useful. 2
maklelan Posted February 1, 2013 Author Posted February 1, 2013 I would rather pay to get Mak's review.Hey, that can be arranged!
Damien the Leper Posted February 1, 2013 Posted February 1, 2013 Hey, that can be arranged!Such a gold digger!!
maklelan Posted February 5, 2013 Author Posted February 5, 2013 I got the journal in the mail yesterday. I've read three articles so far. Rob's is the only really scholarly one so far, but there are still a few to go. Apart from the articles themselves, I can't say I'm impressed with the layout or the editing.
Damien the Leper Posted February 5, 2013 Posted February 5, 2013 Don't go back, it is a cesspit.I'll take a Christ-like crucifixion over visiting that board. The crucifixion seems less painful. Or in your words "I'd rather be impaled on a spork." 1
Damien the Leper Posted February 5, 2013 Posted February 5, 2013 I got the journal in the mail yesterday. I've read three articles so far. Rob's is the only really scholarly one so far, but there are still a few to go. Apart from the articles themselves, I can't say I'm impressed with the layout or the editing.How disappointing.
Garden Girl Posted February 5, 2013 Posted February 5, 2013 Life without risks is like food without salt.It can kill you... GG 1
volgadon Posted February 5, 2013 Posted February 5, 2013 How disappointing.About what I expected, though.Mak, do the articles seemed geared towards an unnamed group, shall we call them, I dunno, Moromons?
Damien the Leper Posted February 5, 2013 Posted February 5, 2013 (edited) About what I expected, though.Mak, do the articles seemed geared towards an unnamed group, shall we call them, I dunno, Moromons?Just thought I'd help.ETA: Good question. I'd like to know as well. Edited February 5, 2013 by Valentinus
maklelan Posted February 5, 2013 Author Posted February 5, 2013 (edited) About what I expected, though.Mak, do the articles seemed geared towards an unnamed group, shall we call them, I dunno, Moromons?No, the articles are aimed primarily at lay Evangelicals. One of the articles is even written by a lay Evangelical (and it shows). The target audience is one of the issues I'm going to address when I finally get to reviewing the papers.Mormons are mentioned a couple times, as are Jehovah's Witnesses and others. The context is just "this is how these 'anti-Trinitarians' interpret this passage." Edited February 5, 2013 by maklelan
Recommended Posts