Jump to content
Seriously No Politics ×

Scef - Book of Mormon onramp


Is Western Civ (European history) fair game to help your friends/neighbors onramp to the Book of Mormon?  

8 members have voted

  1. 1. How do you feel about leveraging European history to encourage a friend/neighbor to read the Book of Mormon?

    • I'm Mormon and am (figuratively) marching with pitchfork and torch to your house.
      0
    • I'm Mormon and am neutral (or don''t care)
      2
    • I'm Mormon and would try sharing something like this with a friend/neighbor or two.
      0
    • I don't identify as Mormon and am a wee bit interested
      0
    • I don't identify as Mormon, and am either neutral about the approach (or don't care)
      0
    • I don't identify as Mormon and am (figuratively) bringing popcorn to cheer on the mob forming under category 1.
      0
    • I'm Mormon and have no idea what you're talking about.
      3
    • I don't identify as Mormon and have no idea what you're talking about.
      1
    • I no longer identify as Mormon, and think it's inappropriate to draw from European culture.
      2


Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, hagoth7 said:

Yes.

 

And should you prefer, you are free to replace that modest "if" with a public "when." 

Agreed.

By suggesting I replace it with a "when", you seem to be taking the assumption as a given...but then you agree that is inappropriate, so I am confused.

And no, I would definitely not prefer to replace it with a "when".

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Calm said:

By suggesting I replace it with a "when"...

If you don't, (and since you don't)...for you and your house, the ifs carry the day. :0)

1 hour ago, Calm said:

...you seem to be taking the assumption as a given....

I do. 

Because...I've simply *already* seen the hoped-for fulfillment from such things, in recent months, in the lives and homes of others. Now it's the small matter of patiently helping that resolved inertia snowball...to benefit more such people....and to hopefully eventually come full circle to benefit those I care about most. 

1 hour ago, Calm said:

...but then you agree that is inappropriate, so I am confused.

Modesty is a good thing. (I didn't say that either stance was *in*appropriate.) 

You chose to stand by the modest/hopeful "if". Super.

Confusion gone?

Edited by hagoth7
Posted
4 hours ago, Honorentheos said:

I need to add a category. I'm no longer Mormon and do not believe in Lehites. So I'm not neutral but I also think your particular theory about them is not much different from the other culturally appropriating attempts to find Lehites in other cultures with actual pasts being rewritten by these attempts.

Good points.  

By the way, what was the crucial or compelling reason(s) you left Mormonism? 

Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, Honorentheos said:

I need to add a category. I'm no longer Mormon and do not believe in Lehites. So I'm not neutral but I also think your particular theory about them is not much different from the other culturally appropriating attempts to find Lehites in other cultures with actual pasts being rewritten by these attempts.

I've added another category.

Edited by hagoth7
Posted
1 hour ago, Robert F. Smith said:

Good points.  

By the way, what was the crucial or compelling reason(s) you left Mormonism? 

Isn't that a subject that can get a person banned? It's still in the rules, and some years back posting about why one left the Church was one of the fastest routes to bansville.

Posted
15 minutes ago, Honorentheos said:

Isn't that a subject that can get a person banned? It's still in the rules, and some years back posting about why one left the Church was one of the fastest routes to bansville.

I guess you think that comes under the prohibition on "Why I Left the Church or de-conversion stories."  I wasn't even aware that it was off-limits, but Oh Well, . . .  and sorry to ask.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...