Jump to content
Seriously No Politics ×

Church statement on homeless outreach


bsjkki

Recommended Posts

Posted

The church outlines their response and support for the homeless population in Salt Lake City. http://www.mormonnewsroom.org/article/responding-needs-homeless-communities  This statement seems to be in response to this event that resulted in Draper pulling their support for a homeless shelter. http://kutv.com/news/local/draper-mayor-withdraws-offer-for-homeless-shelter-after-boos-yelling It seems to odd to me that I read so many articles about how Salt Lake City had solved the homeless problem and then this year, the opposite seems to be true. http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-utah-solved-chronic-homelessness-20150418-story.html What's up?

Posted

I don't have time to look things up right now, but I remember reading or watching a report on this, part of it is on the definition of "chronic homelessness." These are people that live as homeless for long extended periods of time as opposed to transient homelessness. Basically it means UT still has homeless people, but how long they're homeless is much shorter than it used to be. When I drive, I see plenty of homeless panhandling....but the faces don't stay the same for as long as they once may have.

And draper is not UT. It's just a city that didn't want it. For one, it's a pretty wealthy area of UT. I'm just saying.....it's not entirely surprising to me that Draper would be up in arms over the humanitarian effort happening in their city.    

Posted
20 minutes ago, BlueDreams said:

I don't have time to look things up right now, but I remember reading or watching a report on this, part of it is on the definition of "chronic homelessness." These are people that live as homeless for long extended periods of time as opposed to transient homelessness. Basically it means UT still has homeless people, but how long they're homeless is much shorter than it used to be. When I drive, I see plenty of homeless panhandling....but the faces don't stay the same for as long as they once may have.

And draper is not UT. It's just a city that didn't want it. For one, it's a pretty wealthy area of UT. I'm just saying.....it's not entirely surprising to me that Draper would be up in arms over the humanitarian effort happening in their city.    

Thou shalt be kind and merciful unto the poor unless it threateneth thy property values in which case thou shalt weep and wail and gnash thy teeth.

Posted (edited)

Salt Lake is rumored to have solved their more transient and drug implicated homeless issues by putting them on buses and the train and sending them south.  This is denied of course, but it may be why reactions are heated up so high right now...that and Draper supposedly had little time to get used to the idea before the meeting.  The SLC police have been cracking down on drug dealers, etc. for awhile.  One of the parks that used to be quite crowded was almost empty the last time we drove by and I saw different police cars drive by in the area at least four and maybe six times (it was 6 weeks ago).  We go up tomorrow so I will try and remember if it is still sparse.

I would be concerned if a homeless shelter opened up near my grandkids, given the often drug problems that are coupled with it.  They play a lot outside without direct adult supervision, the whole neighbour is pretty young as it is a new development and there are masses of kids running around outside.  I wouldn't be particularly concerned if it opened nearby because then I would be aware of any issues and could adjust.  Plus there are usually adults walking around or working outside (huge yards and a number of retirees) as much as kids.  Unlikely to do it though because we are out in the boonies.

Edited by Calm
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...