Jump to content


Coming Revisions To Church Curriculum


  • Please log in to reply
129 replies to this topic

#1 blooit

blooit

    Seasoned Member: Separates Light & Dark

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 434 posts

Posted 01 April 2012 - 08:40 PM

A close relative of mine works in the church public relations and marketing department. He said that, starting with seminary and institute curriculum, the church will be making revisions. He said that the outright intent of these revisions is to openly and honestly address controversial subjects in Mormon history so that youth and young adults are not surprised when they come across them. He specifically mentioned polygamy and the priesthood ban.

Very wise IMHO, and shows how things are continuing to move forward.
Standing for the One . . . Who hung for us

#2 BCSpace

BCSpace

    Right Divider of Systematic LDS Theology

  • Contributor
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 17,018 posts

Posted 01 April 2012 - 08:50 PM

They will be quite good.
BYU Combined Choirs perform "Come Thou Fount Of Every Blessing"
LDS doctrine defined.  The first bullet point is the key.
Capitalism from the Lord: Law of Consecration.
Evolution Primer Evolution does not conflict with LDS doctrine in any way.

#3 Duncan

Duncan

    Canadian Jester and Knowledge Navigator

  • Contributor
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,662 posts

Posted 01 April 2012 - 08:55 PM

I await to see how this will all happen-What if the teacher now has the floor to say their opinion on the matter? are we free to disagree?
“I know that God lives. I know that Jesus lives; for I have seen Him. I know that this is the Church of God, and that it is founded on Jesus Christ, our Redeemer. I testify to you of these things as one that knows—as one of the Apostles of the Lord Jesus Christ that can bear witness to you today in the presence of the Lord that He lives and that He will live, and will come to reign on the earth, to sway an undisputed sceptre”.
President George Q. Cannon
(Oct. 6, 1896, DW 53:610)

#4 BCSpace

BCSpace

    Right Divider of Systematic LDS Theology

  • Contributor
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 17,018 posts

Posted 01 April 2012 - 09:04 PM

Quote

I await to see how this will all happen-What if the teacher now has the floor to say their opinion on the matter? are we free to disagree?

One always is.  If you do it publically of course the teacher will steer the conversation back to a believing one because the official publications are official doctrine and that is what the time is allotted for; teaching the doctrine.  I wish it could be otherwise because there is also value in debate, but the problem has been people get offended or misunderstand and if that's going to happen, it might as well be they are offended by the Church's doctrine rather than someone else's opinion.
BYU Combined Choirs perform "Come Thou Fount Of Every Blessing"
LDS doctrine defined.  The first bullet point is the key.
Capitalism from the Lord: Law of Consecration.
Evolution Primer Evolution does not conflict with LDS doctrine in any way.

#5 Log

Log

    Everyone loves Log!

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,286 posts

Posted 01 April 2012 - 09:07 PM

I am trying to teach my children from their youth the harder sayings of the Gospel and occurrences in our history.  It's good that the Lord is doing this, too.
Darwinism is not a testable scientific theory, but a metaphysical research programme. - Karl Popper

If my mental processes are determined wholly by the motions of atoms in my brain, I have no reason to suppose my beliefs are true ... and hence I have no reason for supposing my brain to be composed of atoms. - J. B. S. Haldane

#6 BCSpace

BCSpace

    Right Divider of Systematic LDS Theology

  • Contributor
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 17,018 posts

Posted 01 April 2012 - 09:14 PM

Somehow I always knew about the doctrines surrounding plural marriage and the ban from an early age.  I knew that JS was plurally married.  I don't remember my parents teaching me those, but I do remember asking about them.  So I'd say the manuals and magazines in general probably have been doing a good job already.  The difference I think is that such has not been front and center and I don't think it unreasonable that they weren't.
BYU Combined Choirs perform "Come Thou Fount Of Every Blessing"
LDS doctrine defined.  The first bullet point is the key.
Capitalism from the Lord: Law of Consecration.
Evolution Primer Evolution does not conflict with LDS doctrine in any way.

#7 Duncan

Duncan

    Canadian Jester and Knowledge Navigator

  • Contributor
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,662 posts

Posted 01 April 2012 - 09:18 PM

View PostBCSpace, on 01 April 2012 - 09:04 PM, said:


One always is.  If you do it publically of course the teacher will steer the conversation back to a believing one because the official publications are official doctrine and that is what the time is allotted for; teaching the doctrine.  I wish it could be otherwise because there is also value in debate, but the problem has been people get offended or misunderstand and if that's going to happen, it might as well be they are offended by the Church's doctrine rather than someone else's opinion.

true, true and you NEED to get someone who is open to discussion and can take opposing views on matters without taking personal offense. I know a guy that has taught that drinking coke is the first step to leaving the Church, I just wonder how he would react with someone saying that he is indeed nuts and you know should whatever
“I know that God lives. I know that Jesus lives; for I have seen Him. I know that this is the Church of God, and that it is founded on Jesus Christ, our Redeemer. I testify to you of these things as one that knows—as one of the Apostles of the Lord Jesus Christ that can bear witness to you today in the presence of the Lord that He lives and that He will live, and will come to reign on the earth, to sway an undisputed sceptre”.
President George Q. Cannon
(Oct. 6, 1896, DW 53:610)

#8 cinepro

cinepro

    It's pronounced "cinepro"

  • Contributor
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,535 posts

Posted 01 April 2012 - 09:24 PM

View PostLog, on 01 April 2012 - 09:07 PM, said:

I am trying to teach my children from their youth the harder sayings of the Gospel and occurrences in our history.  It's good that the Lord is doing this, too.

Dan Peterson has some entertaining stories about his time working on the curriculum for the Church, and the assumptions of some Church members regarding the degree of inspiration involved in forming said curriculum.
The LDS Stake Medium Council Blog

In spite of the world's arguments against the historicity of the Flood, and despite the supposed lack of geologic evidence, we Latter-day Saints believe that Noah was an actual man, a prophet of God, who preached repentance and raised a voice of warning, built an ark, gathered his family and a host of animals onto the ark, and floated safely away as waters covered the entire earth. We are assured that these events actually occurred by the multiple testimonies of God's prophets.

The Flood and the Tower of Babel,  by Donald W. Parry, assistant professor of Hebrew at BYU, Ensign, Jan 1998, 35

#9 Log

Log

    Everyone loves Log!

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,286 posts

Posted 01 April 2012 - 09:34 PM

I take it on faith the good ship Zion is helmed by God, and I don't concern myself with its administration outside of my callings.  As for Dan's level of inspiration, he's shills for Romney, and that's enough for me to draw a few conclusions of my own.

Love ya, Dan!
Darwinism is not a testable scientific theory, but a metaphysical research programme. - Karl Popper

If my mental processes are determined wholly by the motions of atoms in my brain, I have no reason to suppose my beliefs are true ... and hence I have no reason for supposing my brain to be composed of atoms. - J. B. S. Haldane

#10 BCSpace

BCSpace

    Right Divider of Systematic LDS Theology

  • Contributor
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 17,018 posts

Posted 01 April 2012 - 09:56 PM

Quote

Dan Peterson has some entertaining stories about his time working on the curriculum for the Church, and the assumptions of some Church members regarding the degree of inspiration involved in forming said curriculum.

Probably because the inspiration was already done before they got to it judging from what I heard.


In any event, someone(s) judged the work good ala the 2007 Newsroom statement.  Plus, all the quotations considered "controversial" have been around too long for the apostles and prophets not to know what is being taught.  Indeed some of the questions some members have who won't accept the word of local leaders come back to us answered by them (if not just an outright "please refer to your local leaders").

Save your copies for comparison.  I predict, like the new Gospel Principles manual, no changes in doctrine and no apologies.  The very recent (2009) Book of Mormon Institute manual should give you a good idea of what's to come.  Check out it's section on 2 Nephi 5:20–25. Very concise and very up front.  Compare with the doctrine on Moses 7:22.  There isn't any, but I think there will be in the future.  There is doctrine on OD 2.

Edited by BCSpace, 01 April 2012 - 10:30 PM.

BYU Combined Choirs perform "Come Thou Fount Of Every Blessing"
LDS doctrine defined.  The first bullet point is the key.
Capitalism from the Lord: Law of Consecration.
Evolution Primer Evolution does not conflict with LDS doctrine in any way.

#11 BCSpace

BCSpace

    Right Divider of Systematic LDS Theology

  • Contributor
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 17,018 posts

Posted 01 April 2012 - 10:03 PM

Quote

One always is. If you do it publically of course the teacher will steer the conversation back to a believing one because the official publications are official doctrine and that is what the time is allotted for; teaching the doctrine. I wish it could be otherwise because there is also value in debate, but the problem has been people get offended or misunderstand and if that's going to happen, it might as well be they are offended by the Church's doctrine rather than someone else's opinion.


Quote

true, true and you NEED to get someone who is open to discussion and can take opposing views on matters without taking personal offense. I know a guy that has taught that drinking coke is the first step to leaving the Church, I just wonder how he would react with someone saying that he is indeed nuts and you know should whatever

Ostensibly, boards like this should fill that need but as you can see, they don't because conversations can be externally controlled even to the point of steering people away from what the Church actually teaches so you never can tell if you're getting the full and complete truth.

As for Coke. I can certainly see how that can be true in some cases.

BYU Combined Choirs perform "Come Thou Fount Of Every Blessing"
LDS doctrine defined.  The first bullet point is the key.
Capitalism from the Lord: Law of Consecration.
Evolution Primer Evolution does not conflict with LDS doctrine in any way.

#12 Freedom

Freedom

    Brings Forth Plants

  • Contributor
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,856 posts

Posted 01 April 2012 - 11:04 PM

The seminary material may be ready this summer for the New Testament. I was involved in a discussion on the matter (not that I am in any sort of position of authority on the matter, more of the right time/write place) where I voiced my concerns about the absolute lack of  history in the Church History curriculum, and the outdated videos (many films dating from the 1980's). The challenge, of course, is the tremendous cost of updating. My suggestion was to get rid of the student manuals since, from what i was told, less than 5% of students use them.

#13 BCSpace

BCSpace

    Right Divider of Systematic LDS Theology

  • Contributor
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 17,018 posts

Posted 02 April 2012 - 12:20 AM

I wonder what a modern-day Johnny Lingo would be like and how many people would be offended by it.  Not that I would care.  It's a good message.

BYU Combined Choirs perform "Come Thou Fount Of Every Blessing"
LDS doctrine defined.  The first bullet point is the key.
Capitalism from the Lord: Law of Consecration.
Evolution Primer Evolution does not conflict with LDS doctrine in any way.

#14 David T

David T

    Brings Forth Plants

  • Contributor
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,984 posts

Posted 02 April 2012 - 06:03 AM

View PostBCSpace, on 02 April 2012 - 12:20 AM, said:

I wonder what a modern-day Johnny Lingo would be like and how many people would be offended by it.  Not that I would care.  It's a good message.


Well, it's right here if you want to find out!
Improvement Era: A Blog About Mormon History, Doctrine, Culture, and Scripture
David T was formerly known here at MD&D as nackhadlow

#15 Alan

Alan

    Separates Water & Dry Land

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,519 posts

Posted 02 April 2012 - 06:54 AM

View PostBCSpace, on 01 April 2012 - 09:14 PM, said:

Somehow I always knew about the doctrines surrounding plural marriage and the ban from an early age.  I knew that JS was plurally married.  

These changes could be a little difficult for me because, unlike nearly every member of the church I know, I do not believe Joseph Smith practiced polygamy.

#16 Gohan

Gohan

    Jedi Knight

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,155 posts

Posted 02 April 2012 - 07:17 AM

View PostFreedom, on 01 April 2012 - 11:04 PM, said:

The seminary material may be ready this summer for the New Testament. I was involved in a discussion on the matter (not that I am in any sort of position of authority on the matter, more of the right time/write place) where I voiced my concerns about the absolute lack of  history in the Church History curriculum, and the outdated videos (many films dating from the 1980's). The challenge, of course, is the tremendous cost of updating. My suggestion was to get rid of the student manuals since, from what i was told, less than 5% of students use them.
Same with the Institute manuals, I've only had about two classes that have actually used them.
Served in the Nevada Las Vegas West Mission: 10/1/2008 - 10/5/2010

Live your life in such a way that when your feet hit the floor in the morning, Satan shudders and says, "Oh Crap...he's awake!"

And there are also many other things which Jesus did, the which, if they should be written every one, I suppose that even the world itself could not contain the books that should be written. Amen.(John 21:25)

#17 jskains

jskains

    Seasoned Member: Separates Light & Dark

  • Banned
  • PipPipPip
  • 639 posts

Posted 02 April 2012 - 08:11 AM

This could go both ways. It could accelerate people leaving the Church if it isn't presented in a special Anti-Mormon approved manner. If the Priesthood ban isn't presented as evil white men keeping the black community down or some other ideology, I am sure it will be earmarked as "whitewashing".
"Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds." - Albert Einstein

#18 cinepro

cinepro

    It's pronounced "cinepro"

  • Contributor
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,535 posts

Posted 02 April 2012 - 12:56 PM

View Postjskains, on 02 April 2012 - 08:11 AM, said:

This could go both ways. It could accelerate people leaving the Church if it isn't presented in a special Anti-Mormon approved manner. If the Priesthood ban isn't presented as evil white men keeping the black community down or some other ideology, I am sure it will be earmarked as "whitewashing".

FWIW, the Church did mention the ending of the priesthood ban in the "Teachings of the Presidents of the Church: Spencer W. Kimball" manual:
Revelation: “A Continuous Melody and a Thunderous Appeal”

Granted, the wording was catastrophically imprecise ("all worthy members" could now have the priesthood?  Really?), but "A" for effort!

It is also mentioned in the Gospel Doctrine Doctrine and Covenants teacher's manual.
The LDS Stake Medium Council Blog

In spite of the world's arguments against the historicity of the Flood, and despite the supposed lack of geologic evidence, we Latter-day Saints believe that Noah was an actual man, a prophet of God, who preached repentance and raised a voice of warning, built an ark, gathered his family and a host of animals onto the ark, and floated safely away as waters covered the entire earth. We are assured that these events actually occurred by the multiple testimonies of God's prophets.

The Flood and the Tower of Babel,  by Donald W. Parry, assistant professor of Hebrew at BYU, Ensign, Jan 1998, 35

#19 Freedom

Freedom

    Brings Forth Plants

  • Contributor
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,856 posts

Posted 02 April 2012 - 01:01 PM

View PostAlan, on 02 April 2012 - 06:54 AM, said:


These changes could be a little difficult for me because, unlike nearly every member of the church I know, I do not believe Joseph Smith practiced polygamy.
Why not?

#20 Buzzard

Buzzard

    Hangs around, makes trouble

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 667 posts

Posted 02 April 2012 - 10:40 PM

View PostDavid T, on 02 April 2012 - 06:03 AM, said:


Well, it's right here if you want to find out!
I loved the original Johnny Lingo, but the remake was an infomercial for a juice marketed via MLM. Arrgh! Worst.Church.Movie.Ever.  Even worse than "Sons of Provo".  Just thinking of it makes me nauseous.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users