New Study - Fire Didn't Bring Down WTC Bldg 7 on 9/11

[blarsen]

I'm really curious what kind of traction/reaction this topic will get on this forum.  Why is it important?  Because the official story of what happened on 9/11 is largely false.  Why important to this forum?  Four individuals involved in significant 9/11 scientific research are active LDS.  Does this mean they are crazy?  Many will think so, and be quick to relegate them to Mormon-related quackery.  But this will be a false judgement coming from people too quick to judge, who have not properly vetted/assimilated contrary information/evidence/analysis.  A very sad situation imho.  How else does it relate to LDS/Mormons?  It has to do w/the actions of secret combinations in the last days that Moroni warned us about.  Should present day LDS members be concerned about such things?  Yes.  Why?  Because Moroni warned us in Ether 8:24 that the Lord has commanded us to wake up to our awful situation when we become aware of such groups getting above us.  I.e., we are commanded to be aware of and be concerned about such things.

This new thread has been started to get out the information recently published by UAF, 3 September 2019, about the completion of their engineering study modeling the collapse of WTC 7.  What are the conclusions of this study?  That the previous conclusions of the NIST report on the collapse of WTC Bldg 7, namely that the collapse was due to sparse office fires, is false, and that the likely cause was the placement of high explosives on  all of the main bearing columns of the building.  I.e., the official story regarding the collapse of Bldg 7 is false.  Does this have implications about the rest of the story.  Yes, indeed.

Peruse the following information if you are so inclined:

Project Summary: A Structural Reevaluation of the Collapse of World Trade Center 7:  Project Summary.  Located here:   http://ine.uaf.edu/wtc7

PDF of UAF study of the collapse of Bldg 7:   http://ine.uaf.edu/media/222439/uaf_wtc7_draft_report_09-03-2019.pdf

  Downloadable

Article by Tyler Durden, on zerohedge.com on this news event:  Major University Study Finds "Fire Did Not Bring Down Tower 7 On 9/11" at: https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-09-05/major-university-study-finds-fire-did-not-bring-down-tower-7-911

Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth:  Fire Did Not Cause 3rd Tower’s Collapse on 9/11, New Study Finds at:     https://www.ae911truth.org/wtc7

Progress report, 2017, by Dr. Holsey on his Bldg. 7 study:    WTC 7 Did Not Collapse from Fire" - Dr. Leroy Hulsey, UAF, Sept. 6, 2017 at: 

Corbett Report on this event:     This is specifically for mfbukowski , who has wondered why he has never heard of the contrary science of 9/11 .

Att

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited September 12, 2019 by blarsen
addition

[Kenngo1969]

https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/a6384/debunking-911-myths-world-trade-center/

[JulieM]

Even my husband, who is so much an anti conspiracy theory believer thinks there’s no way building 7 came down other than a controlled demolition.  Watch the video!  It wasn’t hit by a plane.  No spot fires would collapse a huge building like that from the roof down.  Weird....

(And no...I’m not a conspiracy theorist either 🤣)

 

-

Edited September 12, 2019 by JulieM

[Duncan]

now that the subject has been broached, I, and others, wish the US would fix their Coca-Cola!!!!!!!!! It' tastes terrible! it tastes like it was filtered through sand or something, all gritty.Put some scientific research into that please and thank you

 

🥤🥤🥤🥤

[SeekingUnderstanding]

3 hours ago, blarsen said:

I'm really curious what kind of traction/reaction this topic will get on this forum.

Conspiracy theories are a dime a dozen. 

[strappinglad]

If one has watched the prep necessary for a controlled demolition of a large building,  the idea that such prep could be done in the full view of thousands of people who worked in those buildings every day, is absolutely NUTS !!!