salgare Posted December 28, 2015 Posted December 28, 2015 Hello, Is it true some grace has been given to banned users of late?
Stargazer Posted December 28, 2015 Posted December 28, 2015 It seems a couple of banned users have shown up again, and Limited users taken off limited. If you look in General Discussions you can see a "sticky" post by the mods talking about the Limited, at least.
salgare Posted December 28, 2015 Author Posted December 28, 2015 yes and I noted the re-post of rules. Hagoth promoted this a bit elsewhere and now I see he is leaving here for a bit
salgare Posted December 28, 2015 Author Posted December 28, 2015 yes and I noted the re-post of rules. Hagoth promoted this a bit elsewhere and now I see he is leaving here for a bit
salgare Posted December 28, 2015 Author Posted December 28, 2015 Please inform me about this new (to me) board update. No edit/delete Can not respond/post anywhere but here in social. Am I "limited" already? Is there a minimum number of posts required here?
salgare Posted December 28, 2015 Author Posted December 28, 2015 btw, full disclosure ... This is me http://www.mormondialogue.org/topic/65217-who-are-you/#comment-1209484697 In reading the updated rules, I'm in violation with this sock. Hagoth7 got me interested in seeing if things might have changed here. I have no clue why ccrw was banned but would like to have ccrw re-instated if somethings have indeed changed here. http://www.mormondiscussions.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?p=939104#p939104
gopher Posted December 28, 2015 Posted December 28, 2015 1 hour ago, salgare said: Please inform me about this new (to me) board update. No edit/delete Can not respond/post anywhere but here in social. Am I "limited" already? Is there a minimum number of posts required here? Same problem here. I could post before the site upgrade. Now there is no option except in social hall.
salgare Posted December 28, 2015 Author Posted December 28, 2015 8 minutes ago, gopher said: Same problem here... What was your previous handle? hehe, just kidding
salgare Posted December 29, 2015 Author Posted December 29, 2015 wow, social hall seems dead. Is it just the holidays?
sunstoned Posted December 29, 2015 Posted December 29, 2015 The social hall does not get the traffic that the main forum does, but things will pick up after the holidays
salgare Posted December 29, 2015 Author Posted December 29, 2015 10 hours ago, gopher said: Same problem here. I could post before the site upgrade. Now there is no option except in social hall. 25 seems to be the magic number of posts needed here in social
Guest Posted December 31, 2015 Posted December 31, 2015 I don't understand that when someone agrees to the rules, and then complains about them. 25 posts have been the rules for as long as I can remember. I broke rules before and have been given a second chance, which I do not attend to do again. Be patient and within a few days or a month and you will reach your 25. A board without rules would be chaos.
salgare Posted December 31, 2015 Author Posted December 31, 2015 1 hour ago, Pa Pa said: I don't understand that when someone agrees to the rules, and then complains about them. 25 posts have been the rules for as long as I can remember. I broke rules before and have been given a second chance, which I do not attend to do again. Be patient and within a few days or a month and you will reach your 25. A board without rules would be chaos. No complaints PaPa. The new board software update appears to operate a bit different now. Before the 25 rule still allowed one to post in "General" but not create a new thread or vote. Likely the same as limited status? On this new update it appears a new user can ONLY post in social until the 25 is hit, then full rights are given in General/news
deli_llama Posted January 5, 2016 Posted January 5, 2016 On December 29, 2015 at 0:48 AM, salgare said: 25 seems to be the magic number of posts needed here in social Same here. I was able to post before, then with the update it was gone. So now I have to work my way to 25 without being too annoying. Thus, this.
salgare Posted January 5, 2016 Author Posted January 5, 2016 32 minutes ago, deli_llama said: Same here. I was able to post before, then with the update it was gone. So now I have to work my way to 25 without being too annoying. Thus, this. yea, I see a 25!
deli_llama Posted January 5, 2016 Posted January 5, 2016 6 minutes ago, salgare said: yea, I see a 25! Alas, no joy. Perhaps I need 25 new posts. Wait, I see 227. Either you are very fast, or...I dunno.
salgare Posted January 5, 2016 Author Posted January 5, 2016 18 hours ago, deli_llama said: Alas, no joy. Perhaps I need 25 new posts. Wait, I see 227. Either you are very fast, or...I dunno. I meant to woo hoo you as you were at 25, now 27 ... get upstairs and post away!
deli_llama Posted January 6, 2016 Posted January 6, 2016 Nah, don't have much to say, prefer reading and observing. I just wanted the option to reply—you know, on the off chance that I ever did feel the desire. I like to plan ahead and fully premeditate my sins.
Tacenda Posted January 6, 2016 Posted January 6, 2016 15 hours ago, deli_llama said: Nah, don't have much to say, prefer reading and observing. I just wanted the option to reply—you know, on the off chance that I ever did feel the desire. I like to plan ahead and fully premeditate my sins. You should, if I can you can! Like your Lama!
deli_llama Posted January 6, 2016 Posted January 6, 2016 Liking the llama is two of the 14 Greatest Commandments; your righteousness will be rewarded with extra cookies in the eternities. 1
Tacenda Posted January 7, 2016 Posted January 7, 2016 10 hours ago, deli_llama said: Liking the llama is two of the 14 Greatest Commandments; your righteousness will be rewarded with extra cookies in the eternities. First I need to learn to spell it.
Stargazer Posted January 8, 2016 Posted January 8, 2016 On 1/7/2016 at 11:30 PM, Tacenda said: First I need to learn to spell it. Well, you spelled it correctly both times! A Lama is a Tibetan Buddhist Monk who reincarnates. A Llama is a South American beast. You just need to know when to use which spelling. But can a Llama be a Lama? I'm pretty sure Lamas cannot be Llamas. 1
Guest Posted January 10, 2016 Posted January 10, 2016 On December 28, 2015 at 2:16 AM, Stargazer said: It seems a couple of banned users have shown up again, and Limited users taken off limited. If you look in General Discussions you can see a "sticky" post by the mods talking about the Limited, at least. It would seem that grace and forgiveness would be welcomed. I hope that I am welcome to full fellowship. I hope...I hope ...I hope.
gopher Posted January 11, 2016 Posted January 11, 2016 On 12/28/2015 at 5:10 PM, salgare said: What was your previous handle? hehe, just kidding Nope, no previous handle. The reason I created an account was the old site wouldn't let you read more than 10 pages of posts in a 24 hour period unless you were logged in. It was a Julie Rowe thread last year that got me to finally create an account. Fun reading!
etz Posted January 21, 2016 Posted January 21, 2016 Twenty five posts? That's a lot of empty posting. But, arbitrary numbers are arbitrary.
Recommended Posts