Two New Ensign Articles Affirming Marriage Between A Man And A Woman

[SeekingUnderstanding]

Because we are entitled through faith and humility to come to know for ourselves what they say is true as opposed to blindly following them.

Let me get if I understand your logic:

 

Option A:

Prophet declares truth.

Person prays about truth.

Spirit tells person Prophet is telling the truth.

Scott concludes this spirit was the Holy Ghost

 

Option B:

Prophet declares truth.

Person prays about truth.

Spirit tells person Prophet is wrong.

Scott concludes this spirit was of Satan.

 

So praying is of what use then? 

[SeekingUnderstanding]

Moroni didn't say that by the power of the Holy Ghost you can come to know things that contradict the anointed servants of God acting in their role as prophets and apostles.

So he didn't say all things?

[rockpond]

Moroni didn't say that by the power of the Holy Ghost you can come to know things that contradict the anointed servants of God acting in their role as prophets and apostles.

 

Under this model there is no point in praying... just believe exactly what the leaders say.  But wait, we've already established that they can be wrong, in unison, for many decades.  Hmmm.

Edited September 3, 2015 by rockpond

[Scott Lloyd]

So he didn't say all things?

What do you think he meant by "all"? False things as well as true things? That doesn't make sense. Things that God has not yet chosen to reveal to anyone? God has never made that promise to any individual.

[SeekingUnderstanding]

If you are referring to the account of the slaying of Laban, read it again. The Spirit brought to Nephi's remembrance a passage of scripture. He was not departing from established revelation.

No it didn't. 

 

"And the Spirit said unto me again: Behold the Lord hath delivered him into thy hands. Yea, and I also knew that he had sought to take away mine own life; yea, and he would not hearken unto the commandments of the Lord; and he also had taken away our property."

 

I don't see any scriptural reference there. The spirit said only "Behold the Lord hath delivered him into thy hands."

[Scott Lloyd]

Under this model there is no point in praying... just believe exactly what the leaders say.  But wait, we've already established that they can be wrong, in unison, for many decades.  Hmmm.

Already answered. See post #543.

[SeekingUnderstanding]

What do you think he meant by "all"? False things as well as true things? That doesn't make sense. Things that God has not yet chosen to reveal to anyone? God has never made that promise to any individual.

So you are saying it depends on what the meaning of "is" is. Oh please. He said we could know the truth of all things.

[Scott Lloyd]

No it didn't. 

 

"And the Spirit said unto me again: Behold the Lord hath delivered him into thy hands. Yea, and I also knew that he had sought to take away mine own life; yea, and he would not hearken unto the commandments of the Lord; and he also had taken away our property."

 

I don't see any scriptural reference there. The spirit said only "Behold the Lord hath delivered him into thy hands."

See verse 13. It is similar to John 11:50.

 

I believe that both are allusions to one or more passages in Hebrew scripture that have been lost to us today.

[Scott Lloyd]

So you are saying it depends on what the meaning of "is" is. Oh please. He said we could know the truth of all things.

So you have no answer to my question, then?

[SeekingUnderstanding]

So you have no answer to my question, then?

To me "all things" means "all things." Apparently to you, "all things" means just things Scott Lloyd approves of?

[SeekingUnderstanding]

See verse 13. It is similar to John 11:50.

 

I believe that both are allusions to one or more passages in Hebrew scripture that have been lost to us today.

So you should have said, I think it quotes a hitherto unknown scripture that was not restored in the JST...

[Scott Lloyd]

Let me get if I understand your logic:

 

Option A:

Prophet declares truth.

Person prays about truth.

Spirit tells person Prophet is telling the truth.

Scott concludes this spirit was the Holy Ghost

 

Option B:

Prophet declares truth.

Person prays about truth.

Spirit tells person Prophet is wrong.

Scott concludes this spirit was of Satan.

 

So praying is of what use then? 

Light, understanding, confidence, guidance, peace, assurance -- need I go on?

[Scott Lloyd]

So you should have said, I think it quotes a hitherto unknown scripture that was not restored in the JST...

I've never asserted the JST contains everything that was lost. Is that what you thought?

[SeekingUnderstanding]

Light, understanding, confidence, guidance, peace, assurance -- need I go on?

Yes, and all of these things point me to an acceptance of Same Sex Marriage. I don't know how to mesh that with the church and don't feel compelled to try. If you tell me to reject the spirit in this matter, then I must also reject the church itself. I can either follow the spirit or not. I don't see another way.

[SeekingUnderstanding]

I've never asserted the JST contains everything that was lost. Is that what you thought?

You stated as fact that it brought a scripture to Nephi's mind. I was merely pointing out you may want to more carefully differentiate your speculations from your facts.

[Scott Lloyd]

Yes, and all of these things point me to an acceptance of Same Sex Marriage. I don't know how to mesh that with the church and don't feel compelled to try. If you tell me to reject the spirit in this matter, then I must also reject the church itself. I can either follow the spirit or not. I don't see another way.

When you've arrived at something that is so absolutely at odds with the unanimous position of the prophets and apostles going back to the beginning, I don't believe you can afford to let it rest there.

 

But that's up to you, of course.

Edited September 3, 2015 by Scott Lloyd

[Scott Lloyd]

You stated as fact that it brought a scripture to Nephi's mind. I was merely pointing out you may want to more carefully differentiate your speculations from your facts.

I feel quite certain of what I said.

 

But you're right in that I should have been more careful about how I presented it. I apologize.

[SeekingUnderstanding]

When you've arrived at something that is so absolutely at odds with the unanimous position of the prophets and apostles going back to the beginning, I don't believe you can afford to let it rest there.

 

But that's up to you, of course.

Indeed it is. Peace.

[Mola Ram Suda Ram]

No.  You shouldn't be listening to me.  You should be seeking your own witness.

A witness to something that has never been taught and not revealed through proper channels? I don't need to pray about that and there is no reason to pray about. Good grief this is getting comical.

 

Do I need to pray if marijuana is against the WoW? And if I did conclude via personal revelation that is is OK that I have a leg to stand on?

 

Your original claim was that gay marriage will happen in the temple one day. I asked how you could claim that? You said through personal revelation. You simply cannot receive that revelation.  You are couching this revelation that is beyond your stewardship by calling it personal. You received a revaluation for people (There will be gay marriage in the temple) that are out side your stewardship. If you had said that I had a personal revelation that gay marriage is good. Then I would not have quite the problem I do.  Do you see the difference?

 

Really I know what this is all about. Your\ are conflicted because you have immediate family (a sister I believe) who is gay and you are trying to reconcile her choice with that of the teachings of the church. And you think you have found a hole. With "The church has been wrong in the past".

Edited September 3, 2015 by Mola Ram Suda Ram

[HappyJackWagon]

 

A witness to something that has never been taught and not revealed through proper channels? I don't need to pray about that and there is no reason to pray about. Good grief this is getting comical.

You only pray about things you're told to pray about? Comical is right.

[Scott Lloyd]

I've let this thread continue in this vein for too long now and have even contributed to it myself to some degree. I should have heeded rockpond's warning.

 

I now fear that it is on the verge of being closed by the moderators for getting too personal. To preclude that from happening, I will now lock it myself for a temporary cooling off period.

[Scott Lloyd]

Reopening this thread and hoping to direct the dialogue back to the topic of the articles by Elder Hafen in the August and September Ensign magazine and related subjects such as the family proclamation and its 20th anniversary, the doctrine and position of the Church of Jesus Christ on marriage, etc.

[Scott Lloyd]

For reference, I am pasting here the statement from the Council of the First Presidency and Quorum of the Twelve Apostles issued June 29 of this year in the wake of the Supreme Court ruling on same-sex "marriage." Included is the introductory letter, formal response and background material.

 

As stated below, this statement by the highest governing council of the Church "restates and reaffirms the doctrinal foundation of Church teachings on morality, marriage, and the family." It is thus to be regarded as authoritative doctrine, not mere opinion, policy or "counsel."

 

(As a parenthetical side note, for the benefit of rockpond, I will point out that the introductory letter, consistent with custom, is addressed to "General Authorities, General Auxiliary Presidencies" and other leaders, verifying what I have said about the designation of General Authority being distinct from that of general auxiliary leaders, which, of course, would include the general presidencies of the Relief Society, Primary and Young Women organizations.)

 

 

 

THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS OFFICE OF THE FIRST PRESIDENCY 47 EAST SOUTH TEMPLE STREET, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84150-1200

 

June 29, 2015

 

TO: General Authorities; General Auxiliary Presidencies; and the following leaders in the United States and Canada: Area Seventies; Temple, Stake Mission and District Presidencies; Bishops and Branch Presidents

Dear Brethren and Sisters:

Enclosed is a statement by the Council of the First Presidency and Quorum of the Twelve in response to the recent Supreme Court decision legalizing same-sex marriage in the United States. The statement also pertains to the situation in Canada. Local leaders are asked to meet with all adults, young men, and young women on either July 5 or July 12 in a setting other than sacrament meeting and read to them the entire statement.

Also included is background material which may be helpful in answering questions that arise.

Stake presidents are asked to see that bishops receive copies of this letter and the enclosures.

Sincerely yours,

Thomas S. Monson

Henry B. Eyring

Dieter F. Uchtdorf

 

 

 

RESPONSE TO THE SUPREME COURT DECISION LEGALIZING SAME‐SEX MARRIAGE IN THE UNITED STATES

 

 

June 29, 2015  

 

Because of the recent decision of the United States Supreme Court and similar legal proceedings and legislative actions in a number of countries that have given civil recognition to same‐sex marriage relationships, the Council of the First Presidency and the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter‐day Saints restates and reaffirms the doctrinal foundation of Church teachings on morality, marriage, and the family. As we do, we encourage all to consider these teachings in the context of the Plan of Salvation and our Heavenly Father’s purposes in creating the earth and providing for our mortal birth and experience here as His children.

Marriage between a man and a woman was instituted by God and is central to His plan for His children and for the well‐being of society. “God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them. And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth” (Genesis 1:27‐28). “Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh” (Genesis 2:24). Strong families, guided by a loving mother and father, serve as the fundamental institution for nurturing children, instilling faith, and transmitting to future generations the moral strengths and values that are important to civilization and vital to eternal salvation.

A family built on marriage of a man and a woman is the best setting for God’s plan of happiness to thrive. That is why communities and nations generally have encouraged and protected marriage between a man and a woman, and the family that results from their union, as privileged institutions. Sexual relations outside of such a marriage are contrary to the laws of God pertaining to morality.

Changes in the civil law do not, indeed cannot, change the moral law that God has established. God expects us to uphold and keep His commandments regardless of divergent opinions or trends in society. His law of chastity is clear: sexual relations are proper only between a man and a woman who are legally and lawfully wedded as husband and wife. We invite all to review and understand the doctrine contained in “The Family: A Proclamation to the World.”

Consistent with our fundamental beliefs, Church officers will not employ their ecclesiastical authority to perform marriages between two people of the same sex, and the Church does not permit its meetinghouses or other properties to be used for ceremonies, receptions, or other activities associated with same‐sex marriages. Nevertheless, all visitors are welcome to our chapels and premises so long as they respect our standards of conduct while there.

The gospel of Jesus Christ teaches us to love and treat all people with kindness and civility—even when we disagree. We affirm that those who avail themselves of laws or court rulings authorizing same‐sex marriage should not be treated disrespectfully. Indeed, the Church has advocated for rights of same‐sex couples in matters of hospitalization and medical care, fair housing and employment, and probate, so long as these do not infringe on the integrity of the traditional family or the constitutional rights of churches.

The Church insists on its leaders’ and members’ right to express and advocate religious convictions on marriage, family, and morality free from retaliation or retribution. The Church is also entitled to maintain its standards of moral conduct and good standing for members.

As members of the Church, we are responsible to teach the gospel of Jesus Christ and to illuminate the great blessings that flow from heeding God’s commandments as well as the inevitable consequences of ignoring them. We invite all to pray that people everywhere will have their hearts softened to the truths God established in the beginning, and that wisdom will be granted to those who are called upon to decide issues critical to society’s future.

THE COUNCIL OF

THE FIRST PRESIDENCY AND

QUORUM OF THE TWELVE APOSTLES

OF THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER‐DAY SAINTS
 

 

Background Material for Bishops and Branch Presidents On the U.S. Supreme Court Decision on Same‐sex Marriage

 

The Church has provided a statement dated June 29, 2015, prepared by the Council of the First Presidency and Quorum of the Twelve Apostles regarding the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision legalizing same‐sex marriage in the United States. The response reaffirms the divinely‐revealed reasons and proper doctrinal context for the Church’s unequivocal position regarding matters of morality, chastity, marriage, and the family. As the response notes, the Church’s teachings on these subjects are grounded in the scriptural declarations of God’s eternal plan for the salvation and exaltation of His children and are framed in “The Family: A Proclamation to the World.” While the statement stands on its own, below is additional information that may be helpful to you in responding to questions that may arise.

For much of human history, civil laws have generally been compatible with God’s laws. Unfortunately, there have been notable exceptions to that pattern. For example, it is legal in the United States to perform an abortion on an unborn fetus. However, this practice is not morally acceptable before God. (See Handbook 1, 17.3). The consumption of alcohol, while contrary to God’s law, is legal in most nations of the world, but the physical and social toll for doing so is a painful matter of record. So, too, with issues of unchaste sexual behavior, whether it be heterosexual or homosexual in its orientation. As the First Presidency has previously said and as this current response affirms, “Changes in the civil law do not, indeed cannot, change the moral law that God has established. God expects us to uphold and keep His commandments regardless of divergent opinions or trends in society” (First Presidency letter on “Same‐Sex Marriage,” January 9, 2014).

What is the Church’s Policy on Homosexual Relations?

“Homosexual behavior violates the commandments of God, is contrary to the purposes of human sexuality, and deprives people of the blessings that can be found in family life and in the saving ordinances of the gospel. Those who persist in such behavior or who influence others to do so are subject to Church discipline. Homosexual behavior can be forgiven through sincere repentance.

“If members engage in homosexual behavior, Church leaders should help them have a clear understanding of faith in Jesus Christ, the process of repentance, and the purpose of life on earth.

“While opposing homosexual behavior, the Church reaches out with understanding and respect to individuals who are attracted to those of the same gender. If members feel same‐gender attraction but do not engage in any homosexual behavior, leaders should support and encourage them in their resolve to live the law of chastity and to control unrighteous thoughts. These members may receive Church callings. If they are worthy and qualified in every other way, they may also hold temple recommends and receive temple ordinances” (Handbook 2, 21.4.6).

Does the authorization of same‐sex marriage affect my right to religious freedom?

Our individual right to religious freedom is protected by the First Amendment to the United States’ Constitution and by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. As we exercise that right, we must also exercise tolerance and respect toward others’ rights but do so without condoning behavior that goes contrary to the laws of God.

“While we strive for the virtue of tolerance, other commendable qualities need not be lost. Tolerance does not require the surrender of noble purpose or of individual identity. The Lord gave instruction to leaders of His restored Church to establish and maintain institutional integrity—‘that the Church may stand independent’ (D&C 78:14)” (Elder Russell M. Nelson, “Teach Us Tolerance and Love,” April 1994 general conference).

How do I respond respectfully to those who consider the Church’s position on this matter unchristian?

Our objection to same‐sex marriage is not based on animosity toward anyone, but on our understanding of God’s purposes for His children. For us, the issues are not simply “tolerance” and “equality.” The issues are the nature of marriage and the consequences of redefining a divinely established institution. In addition, redefining marriage in the law can have profound consequences for society, particularly for children. Mothers and fathers matter, and they are not interchangeable.

“On the subject of public discourse, we should all follow the gospel teachings to love our neighbor and avoid contention. Followers of Christ should be examples of civility. We should . . . be good listeners and show concern for the sincere belief [of others.] Though we may disagree, we should not be disagreeable. We should be wise in explaining our position and, in doing so, ask that others not be offended by our sincere religious beliefs and the free exercise of our religion” (Elder Dallin H. Oaks, “Loving Others and Living with Differences,” October 2014 general conference).

What if I have reservations of my own regarding the Church’s position on this subject?

“Members who . . . have doctrinal questions should make a diligent effort, including earnest prayer and scripture study, to find solutions and answers themselves. Church members are encouraged to seek guidance from the Holy Ghost to help them in their personal lives and in family and Church responsibilities.

“If members still need help, they should counsel first with their bishop. If necessary, he may refer them to the stake president. “. . . Stake presidents who need clarification about doctrinal or other Church matters may write in behalf of their members to the First Presidency” (Handbook 2, 21.1.24).

Edited September 4, 2015 by Scott Lloyd

[Scott Lloyd]

For further reference, here is a copy of the family proclamation:

The Family A Proclamation to the World The First Presidency and Council of the Twelve Apostles of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints

We, the First Presidency and the Council of the Twelve Apostles of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, solemnly proclaim that marriage between a man and a woman is ordained of God and that the family is central to the Creator’s plan for the eternal destiny of His children.

All human beings—male and female—are created in the image of God. Each is a beloved spirit son or daughter of heavenly parents, and, as such, each has a divine nature and destiny. Gender is an essential characteristic of individual premortal, mortal, and eternal identity and purpose.

In the premortal realm, spirit sons and daughters knew and worshipped God as their Eternal Father and accepted His plan by which His children could obtain a physical body and gain earthly experience to progress toward perfection and ultimately realize their divine destiny as heirs of eternal life. The divine plan of happiness enables family relationships to be perpetuated beyond the grave. Sacred ordinances and covenants available in holy temples make it possible for individuals to return to the presence of God and for families to be united eternally.

The first commandment that God gave to Adam and Eve pertained to their potential for parenthood as husband and wife. We declare that God’s commandment for His children to multiply and replenish the earth remains in force. We further declare that God has commanded that the sacred powers of procreation are to be employed only between man and woman, lawfully wedded as husband and wife.

We declare the means by which mortal life is created to be divinely appointed. We affirm the sanctity of life and of its importance in God’s eternal plan.

Husband and wife have a solemn responsibility to love and care for each other and for their children. “Children are an heritage of the Lord” (Psalm 127:3). Parents have a sacred duty to rear their children in love and righteousness, to provide for their physical and spiritual needs, and to teach them to love and serve one another, observe the commandments of God, and be law-abiding citizens wherever they live. Husbands and wives—mothers and fathers—will be held accountable before God for the discharge of these obligations.

The family is ordained of God. Marriage between man and woman is essential to His eternal plan. Children are entitled to birth within the bonds of matrimony, and to be reared by a father and a mother who honor marital vows with complete fidelity. Happiness in family life is most likely to be achieved when founded upon the teachings of the Lord Jesus Christ. Successful marriages and families are established and maintained on principles of faith, prayer, repentance, forgiveness, respect, love, compassion, work, and wholesome recreational activities. By divine design, fathers are to preside over their families in love and righteousness and are responsible to provide the necessities of life and protection for their families. Mothers are primarily responsible for the nurture of their children. In these sacred responsibilities, fathers and mothers are obligated to help one another as equal partners. Disability, death, or other circumstances may necessitate individual adaptation. Extended families should lend support when needed.

We warn that individuals who violate covenants of chastity, who abuse spouse or offspring, or who fail to fulfill family responsibilities will one day stand accountable before God. Further, we warn that the disintegration of the family will bring upon individuals, communities, and nations the calamities foretold by ancient and modern prophets.

We call upon responsible citizens and officers of government everywhere to promote those measures designed to maintain and strengthen the family as the fundamental unit of society.

This proclamation was read by President Gordon B. Hinckley as part of his message at the General Relief Society Meeting held September 23, 1995, in Salt Lake City, Utah.

 

Edited September 4, 2015 by Scott Lloyd

[Russell C McGregor]

For reference, I am pasting here the statement from the Council of the First Presidency and Quorum of the Twelve Apostles issued June 29 of this year in the wake of the Supreme Court ruling on same-sex "marriage." Included is the introductory letter, formal response and background material.

 

As stated below, this statement by the highest governing council of the Church "restates and reaffirms the doctrinal foundation of Church teachings on morality, marriage, and the family." It is thus to be regarded as authoritative doctrine, not mere opinion or "counsel."

 

(As a parenthetical side note, for the benefit of rockpoind, I will point out that the introductory letter, consistent with custom, is addressed to "General Authorities, General Auxiliary Presidencies" and other leaders, verifying what I have said about the designation of General Authority being distinct from that of general auxiliary leaders, which, of course, would include the general presidencies of the Relief Society, Primary and Young Women organizations.)

 

 

 

THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS OFFICE OF THE FIRST PRESIDENCY 47 EAST SOUTH TEMPLE STREET, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84150-1200

 

June 29, 2015

 

TO: General Authorities; General Auxiliary Presidencies; and the following leaders in the United States and Canada: Area Seventies; Temple, Stake Mission and District Presidencies; Bishops and Branch Presidents

Dear Brethren and Sisters:

Enclosed is a statement by the Council of the First Presidency and Quorum of the Twelve in response to the recent Supreme Court decision legalizing same-sex marriage in the United States. The statement also pertains to the situation in Canada. Local leaders are asked to meet with all adults, young men, and young women on either July 5 or July 12 in a setting other than sacrament meeting and read to them the entire statement.

Also included is background material which may be helpful in answering questions that arise.

Stake presidents are asked to see that bishops receive copies of this letter and the enclosures.

Sincerely yours,

Thomas S. Monson

Henry B. Eyring

Dieter F. Uchtdorf

 

 

 

RESPONSE TO THE SUPREME COURT DECISION LEGALIZING SAME‐SEX MARRIAGE IN THE UNITED STATES

 

 

June 29, 2015  

 

Because of the recent decision of the United States Supreme Court and similar legal proceedings and legislative actions in a number of countries that have given civil recognition to same‐sex marriage relationships, the Council of the First Presidency and the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter‐day Saints restates and reaffirms the doctrinal foundation of Church teachings on morality, marriage, and the family. As we do, we encourage all to consider these teachings in the context of the Plan of Salvation and our Heavenly Father’s purposes in creating the earth and providing for our mortal birth and experience here as His children.

Marriage between a man and a woman was instituted by God and is central to His plan for His children and for the well‐being of society. “God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them. And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth” (Genesis 1:27‐28). “Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh” (Genesis 2:24). Strong families, guided by a loving mother and father, serve as the fundamental institution for nurturing children, instilling faith, and transmitting to future generations the moral strengths and values that are important to civilization and vital to eternal salvation.

A family built on marriage of a man and a woman is the best setting for God’s plan of happiness to thrive. That is why communities and nations generally have encouraged and protected marriage between a man and a woman, and the family that results from their union, as privileged institutions. Sexual relations outside of such a marriage are contrary to the laws of God pertaining to morality.

Changes in the civil law do not, indeed cannot, change the moral law that God has established. God expects us to uphold and keep His commandments regardless of divergent opinions or trends in society. His law of chastity is clear: sexual relations are proper only between a man and a woman who are legally and lawfully wedded as husband and wife. We invite all to review and understand the doctrine contained in “The Family: A Proclamation to the World.”

Consistent with our fundamental beliefs, Church officers will not employ their ecclesiastical authority to perform marriages between two people of the same sex, and the Church does not permit its meetinghouses or other properties to be used for ceremonies, receptions, or other activities associated with same‐sex marriages. Nevertheless, all visitors are welcome to our chapels and premises so long as they respect our standards of conduct while there.

The gospel of Jesus Christ teaches us to love and treat all people with kindness and civility—even when we disagree. We affirm that those who avail themselves of laws or court rulings authorizing same‐sex marriage should not be treated disrespectfully. Indeed, the Church has advocated for rights of same‐sex couples in matters of hospitalization and medical care, fair housing and employment, and probate, so long as these do not infringe on the integrity of the traditional family or the constitutional rights of churches.

The Church insists on its leaders’ and members’ right to express and advocate religious convictions on marriage, family, and morality free from retaliation or retribution. The Church is also entitled to maintain its standards of moral conduct and good standing for members.

As members of the Church, we are responsible to teach the gospel of Jesus Christ and to illuminate the great blessings that flow from heeding God’s commandments as well as the inevitable consequences of ignoring them. We invite all to pray that people everywhere will have their hearts softened to the truths God established in the beginning, and that wisdom will be granted to those who are called upon to decide issues critical to society’s future.

THE COUNCIL OF

THE FIRST PRESIDENCY AND

QUORUM OF THE TWELVE APOSTLES

OF THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER‐DAY SAINTS

 

 

Background Material for Bishops and Branch Presidents On the U.S. Supreme Court Decision on Same‐sex Marriage

 

The Church has provided a statement dated June 29, 2015, prepared by the Council of the First Presidency and Quorum of the Twelve Apostles regarding the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision legalizing same‐sex marriage in the United States. The response reaffirms the divinely‐revealed reasons and proper doctrinal context for the Church’s unequivocal position regarding matters of morality, chastity, marriage, and the family. As the response notes, the Church’s teachings on these subjects are grounded in the scriptural declarations of God’s eternal plan for the salvation and exaltation of His children and are framed in “The Family: A Proclamation to the World.” While the statement stands on its own, below is additional information that may be helpful to you in responding to questions that may arise.

For much of human history, civil laws have generally been compatible with God’s laws. Unfortunately, there have been notable exceptions to that pattern. For example, it is legal in the United States to perform an abortion on an unborn fetus. However, this practice is not morally acceptable before God. (See Handbook 1, 17.3). The consumption of alcohol, while contrary to God’s law, is legal in most nations of the world, but the physical and social toll for doing so is a painful matter of record. So, too, with issues of unchaste sexual behavior, whether it be heterosexual or homosexual in its orientation. As the First Presidency has previously said and as this current response affirms, “Changes in the civil law do not, indeed cannot, change the moral law that God has established. God expects us to uphold and keep His commandments regardless of divergent opinions or trends in society” (First Presidency letter on “Same‐Sex Marriage,” January 9, 2014).

What is the Church’s Policy on Homosexual Relations?

“Homosexual behavior violates the commandments of God, is contrary to the purposes of human sexuality, and deprives people of the blessings that can be found in family life and in the saving ordinances of the gospel. Those who persist in such behavior or who influence others to do so are subject to Church discipline. Homosexual behavior can be forgiven through sincere repentance.

“If members engage in homosexual behavior, Church leaders should help them have a clear understanding of faith in Jesus Christ, the process of repentance, and the purpose of life on earth.

“While opposing homosexual behavior, the Church reaches out with understanding and respect to individuals who are attracted to those of the same gender. If members feel same‐gender attraction but do not engage in any homosexual behavior, leaders should support and encourage them in their resolve to live the law of chastity and to control unrighteous thoughts. These members may receive Church callings. If they are worthy and qualified in every other way, they may also hold temple recommends and receive temple ordinances” (Handbook 2, 21.4.6).

Does the authorization of same‐sex marriage affect my right to religious freedom?

Our individual right to religious freedom is protected by the First Amendment to the United States’ Constitution and by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. As we exercise that right, we must also exercise tolerance and respect toward others’ rights but do so without condoning behavior that goes contrary to the laws of God.

“While we strive for the virtue of tolerance, other commendable qualities need not be lost. Tolerance does not require the surrender of noble purpose or of individual identity. The Lord gave instruction to leaders of His restored Church to establish and maintain institutional integrity—‘that the Church may stand independent’ (D&C 78:14)” (Elder Russell M. Nelson, “Teach Us Tolerance and Love,” April 1994 general conference).

How do I respond respectfully to those who consider the Church’s position on this matter unchristian?

Our objection to same‐sex marriage is not based on animosity toward anyone, but on our understanding of God’s purposes for His children. For us, the issues are not simply “tolerance” and “equality.” The issues are the nature of marriage and the consequences of redefining a divinely established institution. In addition, redefining marriage in the law can have profound consequences for society, particularly for children. Mothers and fathers matter, and they are not interchangeable.

“On the subject of public discourse, we should all follow the gospel teachings to love our neighbor and avoid contention. Followers of Christ should be examples of civility. We should . . . be good listeners and show concern for the sincere belief [of others.] Though we may disagree, we should not be disagreeable. We should be wise in explaining our position and, in doing so, ask that others not be offended by our sincere religious beliefs and the free exercise of our religion” (Elder Dallin H. Oaks, “Loving Others and Living with Differences,” October 2014 general conference).

What if I have reservations of my own regarding the Church’s position on this subject?

“Members who . . . have doctrinal questions should make a diligent effort, including earnest prayer and scripture study, to find solutions and answers themselves. Church members are encouraged to seek guidance from the Holy Ghost to help them in their personal lives and in family and Church responsibilities.

“If members still need help, they should counsel first with their bishop. If necessary, he may refer them to the stake president. “. . . Stake presidents who need clarification about doctrinal or other Church matters may write in behalf of their members to the First Presidency” (Handbook 2, 21.1.24).

That doesn't seem to leave a whole lot of wiggle room, does it?