Jump to content
Seriously No Politics ×

My Column in "Mormon Times"


Daniel Peterson

Recommended Posts

Posted

I think that I've failed to note one or two weeks of Peterson's habitually toxic nonsense.  Anyway . . .

 

In his most recent column, Peterson admits that the Book of Mormon is riddled with anachronisms, but contemptuously says "It doesn't matter, morons!":

 

http://www.deseretnews.com/article/865602130/2-Book-of-Mormon-errors.html

Compared to you, I probably am a moron, Dan! :rofl:

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

Hamlet Act 3 Scene 1. ;)

 

POLONIUS
 43   Ophelia, walk you here. —Gracious, so please you,
 44   We will bestow ourselves. [To Ophelia.] Read on this book;
 45   That show of such an exercise may color
 46   Your loneliness. We are oft to blame in this—
 47   'Tis too much proved—that with devotion's visage
 48   And pious action we do sugar o'er
 49   The devil himself.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Dr. P, one of my favorite playlists on YouTube is you discussing Christopher Hitchens.  Can you tell me if the book you discuss that answers Hitchens will ever be published?

 

The reason I ask this is because I have a grandson who is currently in a post-graduate math program at Purdue, and he is has become a fan of Hitchens and Hitchens-like atheist writers.  "God and Mr. Hitchens" would make a wonderful gift for him!

Posted

Attempting to revise the Bible in order to create a wrathful and vengeful god after his own angry image, Peterson denounces all the passages that portray God as loving, claiming that they're later insertions by immoral, drug-crazed hippies and liberals:

 

http://www.patheos.com/blogs/danpeterson/2014/07/two-opposing-errors-about-the-love-of-god.html

 

 

It is funny but even after you pointed out the errors, lots of people in the comments made them again.  One that I noticed was the following:

 

 

 

The real God is better represented by his actual appearances to man in the four gospels and in the Book of Mormon's 3rd Nephi. Even the whip he braided was not used on people; it was used to drive animals from the temple courts. And let's remember, the real God did not go about seeking to kill people but was killed by them.

 

This ignores what Christ said to the Nephites right before his appearance--how he burned/destroyed entire cities because of their wickedness, etc...

Posted

Star Gazer:

 

No, the book never appeared.  And that was exceedingly frustrating.  We got on it right away, and had it about 70-80% finished.  And we had a significant non-LDS publisher who expressed strong interest.  But the publisher then dawdled and hemmed and hawed, and published another (in my opinion, much weaker) book on the topic by a different author.  By that time, the golden moment had passed, and we couldn't find any substitute publisher outside of the LDS community -- for which my co-author, Bill Hamblin, had no interest.

 

We've still got the materials, and I think they're excellent.  But, at this point, they would have to be refocused a bit so as not to concentrate solely on Hitchens, and neither of us has the time at the moment.

 

Alas.

Posted

Zeta-Flux:

 

I noticed exactly what you point out.  And, although I've rarely if ever used a subsequent column to respond to comments on a previous one, I'm thinking of making an exception in a couple of weeks, because the line of reasoning you point out is so blatantly wrong.

Posted

Star Gazer:

 

No, the book never appeared.  And that was exceedingly frustrating.  We got on it right away, and had it about 70-80% finished.  And we had a significant non-LDS publisher who expressed strong interest.  But the publisher then dawdled and hemmed and hawed, and published another (in my opinion, much weaker) book on the topic by a different author.  By that time, the golden moment had passed, and we couldn't find any substitute publisher outside of the LDS community -- for which my co-author, Bill Hamblin, had no interest.

 

We've still got the materials, and I think they're excellent.  But, at this point, they would have to be refocused a bit so as not to concentrate solely on Hitchens, and neither of us has the time at the moment.

 

Alas.

 

Very disheartening.

 

I'd offer to publish it under my own imprint, but ...  I'm only a print-on-demand shop, and this book would seem to need a more prestigious label with some marketing clout.

 

Oh, well.

 

Just out of curiosity, how many words are in the book?

Posted

Very disheartening.

 

I'd offer to publish it under my own imprint, but ...  I'm only a print-on-demand shop, and this book would seem to need a more prestigious label with some marketing clout.

 

Oh, well.

 

Just out of curiosity, how many words are in the book?

 

 

I would need to go back and look.  It was more than 80,000, I recall.

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Snarling at those who dare to disagree, Peterson announces that Joseph Smith was a sinless god who may not be criticized:

 

http://www.deseretnews.com/article/865610152/Joseph-Smith-wasnt-arrogant-or-boastful.html

And thus your justification for believing this:

"What may startle some about this situation is that most of what Joseph Smith said or implied about geography indicates that he did not understand or was ambiguous about the fact, as it turns out, that Mesoamerica was the particular setting for Nephite history."

http://publications.maxwellinstitute.byu.edu/fullscreen/?pub=1099&index=19&keyword=Said%20or%20implied

Congratulations in your criticisms of the Prophet Joseph Smith!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...