wenglund Posted April 18, 2013 Posted April 18, 2013 Nice.Sardonic humor typically is. LOLThanks, -Wade Englund-
CASteinman Posted April 18, 2013 Posted April 18, 2013 Sardonic humor typically is. LOLMy favorite line: "You may attack me now".
teddyaware Posted April 18, 2013 Posted April 18, 2013 But why? I'm from the Shore. So instead of a cigar or chocolate covered strawberries, I'll take a Rita's Cherry Gelato if you don't mind!I was in Spring Lake (near Point Pleasent) yesterday, doing some contractor work for and Inn there called the Johnson House. That limited area didn't look like it was hit too badly by Sandy.One of the most memorable weeks of my life was a vacation spent on Long Beach Island when I was a teen. By the way, we have Rita's in our area as well.
mfbukowski Posted April 18, 2013 Posted April 18, 2013 Whenever this is claimed of Jesus though, you would vehemently deny it right? There is more evidence that Jesus didn't exist than that Socrates didn't exist. I'm not saying this is my belief, I am saying the evidence is even less in favor of Jesus existing. Who's really to say?No I wouldn't deny it at all. If you would actually read my posts you would know that I bring it up all the time.It is impossible to prove that Jesus existed. So what? So how come you have gone fundamentalist on all this??
wenglund Posted April 18, 2013 Posted April 18, 2013 So how come you have gone fundamentalist on all this??It seems to be a prerequisite for "leaving the reservation." Thanks, -Wade Englund-
CASteinman Posted April 18, 2013 Posted April 18, 2013 It is impossible to prove that Jesus existed. Depends upon what "prove" means. And no matter how you define it, if you are being reasonable, Kerry is still wrong. There is not "more evidence that Jesus didn't exist than that Socrates didn't exist." The idea is preposterous --- and not because its Jesus and Socrates. Where do you get ANY evidence that either one did not exist? Silliness. An example of ridiculously poor logic. 1
mfbukowski Posted April 18, 2013 Posted April 18, 2013 Depends upon what "prove" means. And no matter how you define it, if you are being reasonable, Kerry is still wrong. There is not "more evidence that Jesus didn't exist than that Socrates didn't exist." The idea is preposterous --- and not because its Jesus and Socrates. Where do you get ANY evidence that either one did not exist? Silliness. An example of ridiculously poor logic.Agreed on all accounts.
Okrahomer Posted April 19, 2013 Author Posted April 19, 2013 Robert Kirby referred to Elder Holland's talk this week as well. I quite like his 11th Particle of Faith:http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/lifestyle/56178670-80/believe-faith-church-god.html.csp"I claim the privilege of worshipping Almighty God according to it being none of your &%#@ business, and allow all men the same privilege except megachurch pastors, self-help gurus and some cannibals."
Recommended Posts