Jump to content
Seriously No Politics ×

Truth Leads to Victory!


Recommended Posts

Posted
8 hours ago, Stormin' Mormon said:

Nehor's analogy is not quite on point, either.  Smac quoted Carlson because the quote included a reference to the Latter-day Saints.  Yes, he could have found another quote with a similar idea from a less polemic figure, but would that quote have had the same LDS-referential nexus?  Maybe, maybe not. 

Nehor needs to re-do his post, using a quote from Hitler in which he mentions the LDS people or culture.  And then his analogy will be more apt.  

I compared it to one of our hymns. I was going to use a very similar quote from an apostle but I didn’t have enough spare lightning rods around to ensure my personal safety if I went with that route.

Posted
1 hour ago, The Nehor said:

Ad hominem, vituperative insults, easing the badger, poisoning the oil well, powering the flux capacitor, black hole diving, (insert random fallacy here), etc.

You never have anything of substance to say.

1 hour ago, The Nehor said:

Nothing of substance.

You've offered nothing substantive to which a substantive response can be made.

All you do is label people you dislike or disagree with as Nazis, or Fasicsts, or as their ennablers/sympathizers.  

1 hour ago, The Nehor said:

Just a laundry list of things I said previously.

Well, I was responding to a CFR.

And nothing you have "said previously" is substantive.

1 hour ago, The Nehor said:

No reason. And a long screed about Nazis when I specifically asked in the OP not to talk about Nazis. If you can’t respect the intent of the thread why post at all?

Yawn.

-Smac

Posted

This dance is long past “getting old” and into stinking decomp.

Posted
1 hour ago, smac97 said:

You never have anything of substance to say.

You've offered nothing substantive to which a substantive response can be made.

All you do is label people you dislike or disagree with as Nazis, or Fasicsts, or as their ennablers/sympathizers.  

Well, I was responding to a CFR.

And nothing you have "said previously" is substantive.

Yawn.

-Smac

Thank you for proving my point.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...